• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lord Salisbury and Palmerston.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In some respects his perspective on foreign policy was similar to that of Palmerston: to avoid entanglements in foreign wars that were not in Britain's interest, but also at the same time to show a willingness to defend Britain's trade and territory resolutely when they were genuinely under threat. His first government post was as Secretary of State for India under Lord Derby in 1866-67 - but this only lasted seven months. He resigned from this post as he disapproved of the proposals of Derby and Disraeli for the extension of the electoral franchise in the 1867 Reform Bill. In 1868 he became the third Marquis of Salisbury. Lord Salisbury could - to some extent - be viewed as a political and social reactionary. He had a vague fear that any further move to democratic reforms would eventually lead to `mob rule'. He considered that the mass of the people possessed poor political judgement. Many today would consider such views at best as pure patrician snobbery, or at worst as quasi-fascist in nature. However, we should bear in mind that this was a period when the memories of violent revolutionary upheaval (France in 1789 and 1830 and most of Europe in 1848) were still uppermost in some people's minds when issues of social and political reforms were discussed. ...read more.

Middle

A less level-headed leader could easily have blundered into a war with any one of these nations, even over `small' incidents like the French incursion into the Upper Nile or Russian activity in the East. Salisbury was not a demagogue. Nor was his an idealistic style of leadership. He was a `management man' - though an effective one. He appreciated that a combination of skilful diplomacy and reserves of military strength were fundamental in order to preserve Britain's power on the world scale. The Boer War (1899-1902) cast a shadow over his declining years and covered the last three years of his fourth and final premiership. The Boers could not be dealt with in the same way as the political representatives of Paris, Berlin or St. Petersburg. A different approach to the problem was needed to solve this unique situation. Salisbury died in 1903 before this could be fully realised. The rights and wrongs of the South African war are complex. The hostility of President Kruger of the Transvaal to British interests and his personal bellicosity, combined with his policy of seeking German intervention in South African affairs at a time when Germany was well established in East Africa and South West Africa, would have troubled the most pacific British government. No small measure of war guilt is attributable to `Oom Paul's' unrealistic Boer ultra-nationalism, egotism and reckless overplaying of his hand, not to mention his tendency to underestimate Great Britain very badly. ...read more.

Conclusion

Rosebery's ministry was defeated in 1895 on a vote on the Army Estimates and Salisbury formed a coalition government with the Duke of Devonshire and Joseph Chamberlain until an election could be held. Chamberlain had taken a substantial number of Liberal MPs over to the ranks of the Conservatives because they disagreed with Gladstone's attempts to give Home Rule to Ireland. Having split the Liberal Party in the 1880s, Chamberlain went on to do the same to the Conservative and Unionist Party in 1903. This ministry passed the Workmen's Compensation Act in 1897 and a Local Government Act for Ireland in 1898. In the reconstructed administration of 1900 there were so many of Salisbury's relations holding office that it was nicknamed the 'Hotel Cecil'. During this part of the ministry, relations with the Boers living in the South African Republic (the Transvaal and the Orange Free State) deteriorated over the rights of the "foreigners" to vote: Paul Kruger had no intention of allowing the Boers to be outnumbered by other settlers. In October 1899 the Boer War broke out, ending only in May 1902 with the Treaty of Vereenging. As his health failed, Salisbury handed over the Foreign Office to Lord Lansdowne; in July 1902 he resigned as PM on the grounds of ill health and was succeeded by his nephew, Arthur Balfour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "The Colonisation of Africa was Inevitable in the Late Nineteenth Century" Discuss.

    Nevertheless, in order to even further ensure the safety of their 'jewel in the crown', the British aspired to safeguard their sea routes to it. Since 1869, when the Suez Canal was built, these sea routes ran along the northern coastline of Africa, therefore, acquiring colonies in this part of

  2. Apartheid in South Africa.

    and makes the premature assumption that 'for them to gather means violence'. He seems to be a harsh, cruel man as well because the reason that he believes to be legitimate for killing 69 protesters is that his car was struck with a stone.

  1. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    Lloyd George was acclaimed as the man who had won the war, and in 1918 the coalition won a huge majority. It was the first election in which any women were allowed to vote. In 1919 Lloyd George signed the Treaty of Versailles, which established the League of Nations and the war reparations settlement.

  2. A Detail on the British Empire Between the Great Wars, from 1918 to 1939.

    The Government took this excuse to institute anti-strike retaliatory measures: the Trades Dispute Act 1927, for example, made sympathetic strikes illegal. Many strikers were also discriminated upon by their employers upon returning to work, and so Union membership declined, with people turning more to the Labour Party, who became the

  1. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    The churches were also pressed by the poverty and exploitation suffered by their congregations. Finally new political parties offered the possibility for alternative state structures and thus political action. The churches filled a political vacuum that had been caused by the fact that no black opposition was allowed and no white opposition outside the churches existed.

  2. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    The most extensive PR exercise during the Ayub Khan regime was the 1965 Indo-Pak war. It is often believed that Pakistan won the battle of 1965, but in fact contrary to what is taught in school text books, Pakistan did not win the war; neither was it India who started it.

  1. How far was Lord Liverpool's government directly responsible for the popular unrest of the ...

    In order to establish whether Liverpool's government were directly or indirectly responsible for the popular unrest, it is necessary to determine exactly what the government were to blame for. In desperate fear of the Radical movement ever assimilating to the extremism of the French revolution, Lord Liverpool's government used spies to infiltrate the radicals.

  2. The Advent of Imperialism

    The British Empire in India may be taken as the most serviceable test. The British was not present there in the first instance for the good of the Indians, nor have the various extensions of political power been motivated primarily by this consideration; but it is contended that the government

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work