• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Make note of the stability of the present two political party system

Extracts from this document...


Abstract In Two Parties - Or More? The American Party System, Dr. John F. Bibby, a professor of American politics at the University of Wisconsin, and L. Sandy Maisel (1998), a professor in the department of government at Colby College, make note of the stability of the present two political party system: Each has sustained dramatic swings of fortune - landslide victories, demoralizing defeats, cliffhanger wins and losses, major splinter movements, and realignments of bases for electoral support. Despite the fluidity of voting patterns over the decades and political dislocations created by two world wars, depressions, waves of new immigrants, industrialization, urbanization, globalization, and changes in lifestyles, the Republican-Democratic two-party system endures. (p. 48) Dominating electoral politics since 1854 (Bibby & Maisel, p. 21), the two-party system has stood up to such challenges with the assistance of several American institutional arrangements, such as the single-member district system, the Electoral College, and media influences including the Commission on Presidential Debates. During this time, the two-party system has helped to maintain political stability, fostered political legitimacy, and promoted national unity. To preserve this stability and retain the additional benefits of having a two-party system, the United States should continue to encourage this system, as opposed to a three-party or multiparty system. ...read more.


56). While proportional representation systems provide "incentives for the creation and perpetuation of multiple and distinct parties," the American arrangement brings with it "incentives toward the creation of two broadly based parties that are capable of winning district-level pluralities and majorities in the legislative chamber" (Bibby & Maisel, p. 56). Kay Lawson, a professor at San Francisco State University and supporter of the multiparty system, believes that the United States needs to change the electoral system to a proportional representation system to encourage the growth of minor parties (Lawson, 1997, p. 66). This transformation would not be an easy one, particularly because the single member district system is deeply rooted in American tradition, as the system dates back more than a century. Bibby comments on altering traditional systems in general: "A truly viable multiparty system would require a change in some basic institutional arrangements to which, for the most part, Americans seem firmly committed" (1997, p. 21). Therefore, since the electoral system is unlikely to change, minor parties will always be "condemned to almost perpetual defeat (Bibby & Maisel, p. 56)" because the United States is inclined to form two major parties under the single-member district system. The Electoral College system for electing presidents is another institutional barrier to multiparty politics. ...read more.


As stated previously, a winning candidate must have a majority or sizable plurality of the vote under the single-member district system; Bibby believes that this requirement of obtaining the majority to win the election "lends an aura of legitimacy to elected officials that in the case of the presidents and governors strengthens their position to lead the nation or their states" (p. 74). Nelson W. Polsby and Aaron Wildavsky echo this opinion: "...this increases the chance that winners will have the backing of a sizable number of voters and the legitimacy to lead Congress and the nation" (Bibby, p. 74). Conclusions Noticing these benefits stemming from the existence of the two-party system, Bibby states, "Perhaps it is because the United States has operated a political system within the context of stability, consensus, and incremental policy change for so long that its advantages tend to be overlooked and taken for granted" (p. 77). Such longevity exhibited by the two-party system is unheard of in foreign governments. The endurance of this system can be attributed to the sense of unity and legitimacy that it provides United States citizens, along with its "high compatibility with American society, culture, and governmental structures" (Bibby, p. 74). The United States government should continue to encourage the two-party system to ultimately maintain the advantageous relationship it has had with the American public. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Party system in India

    We saw the emergence of bipolarities in the States and at the Centre. While in the States it is in the form of a competition between two parties or between two competing alliances, at the national level it was mainly a competition between competing alliances.

  2. Why is corruption so prominent in the contemporary Latin American political scene?

    While attacking the politicians guilty of multi-million dollar corruption is a great success, what is really necessary is to combat corruption in everyday life, to end the acceptance by Latin Americans of corruption as being acceptable. Bernard Aronson argues that "the culture that allows this to be a way of

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Electors have two votes. Half the Members of the Bundestag (328) are elected in single-member constituencies based on a simple plurality of votes. The remaining MPs are elected from closed party lists in each region (Land). Parties which receive less than a specified minimum threshold of list votes (5 per cent)

  2. Political parties and representation

    Often the electoral playing field was far from level (electoral malpractice, but also bias of state-owned media, ruling party's greater resources, etc.) (ii) Opposition parties' shortage of finance. (iii) Opposition fragmented as aspirants scrambled for power.

  1. What Is The Role Of Minor Parties Within The American Political System.

    in the USA is when a factional conflict arises within the two major parties. The most successful of these factional parties has been Theodore Roosevelt's Bull Moose Party. Other examples of strong factional parties include the State's Rights party formed in 1948 by southern Democrats who were angered by northern Democrats' support of racial desegregation.

  2. Russia - political past, present and future

    Finally, on October 25, 1917 the legendary Cruiser Aurora signaled the beginning of the Outrageous "October" revolution that was meant to cease and obliterate dictatorship once and for all. The Red Army led by the Bolshevik Party and Lenin swept through Russia killing the nobility, and the Royal Family.

  1. What is the best description of the UK party system? Two-party, Three-party, Multi-party or ...

    (The US is the best example of a two-party system as only the Republicans or the Democrats have ever been in power.) However on the other hand smaller parties have won increasing proportions of the vote in recent elections. Along with the fact that some small parties to well in certain areas, e.g.

  2. The Kurds make up about blank% of Turkeys population

    Some thought this was disrespectful because they did not identify them as Kurds but called them Turks.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work