• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Make note of the stability of the present two political party system

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Abstract In Two Parties - Or More? The American Party System, Dr. John F. Bibby, a professor of American politics at the University of Wisconsin, and L. Sandy Maisel (1998), a professor in the department of government at Colby College, make note of the stability of the present two political party system: Each has sustained dramatic swings of fortune - landslide victories, demoralizing defeats, cliffhanger wins and losses, major splinter movements, and realignments of bases for electoral support. Despite the fluidity of voting patterns over the decades and political dislocations created by two world wars, depressions, waves of new immigrants, industrialization, urbanization, globalization, and changes in lifestyles, the Republican-Democratic two-party system endures. (p. 48) Dominating electoral politics since 1854 (Bibby & Maisel, p. 21), the two-party system has stood up to such challenges with the assistance of several American institutional arrangements, such as the single-member district system, the Electoral College, and media influences including the Commission on Presidential Debates. During this time, the two-party system has helped to maintain political stability, fostered political legitimacy, and promoted national unity. To preserve this stability and retain the additional benefits of having a two-party system, the United States should continue to encourage this system, as opposed to a three-party or multiparty system. ...read more.

Middle

56). While proportional representation systems provide "incentives for the creation and perpetuation of multiple and distinct parties," the American arrangement brings with it "incentives toward the creation of two broadly based parties that are capable of winning district-level pluralities and majorities in the legislative chamber" (Bibby & Maisel, p. 56). Kay Lawson, a professor at San Francisco State University and supporter of the multiparty system, believes that the United States needs to change the electoral system to a proportional representation system to encourage the growth of minor parties (Lawson, 1997, p. 66). This transformation would not be an easy one, particularly because the single member district system is deeply rooted in American tradition, as the system dates back more than a century. Bibby comments on altering traditional systems in general: "A truly viable multiparty system would require a change in some basic institutional arrangements to which, for the most part, Americans seem firmly committed" (1997, p. 21). Therefore, since the electoral system is unlikely to change, minor parties will always be "condemned to almost perpetual defeat (Bibby & Maisel, p. 56)" because the United States is inclined to form two major parties under the single-member district system. The Electoral College system for electing presidents is another institutional barrier to multiparty politics. ...read more.

Conclusion

As stated previously, a winning candidate must have a majority or sizable plurality of the vote under the single-member district system; Bibby believes that this requirement of obtaining the majority to win the election "lends an aura of legitimacy to elected officials that in the case of the presidents and governors strengthens their position to lead the nation or their states" (p. 74). Nelson W. Polsby and Aaron Wildavsky echo this opinion: "...this increases the chance that winners will have the backing of a sizable number of voters and the legitimacy to lead Congress and the nation" (Bibby, p. 74). Conclusions Noticing these benefits stemming from the existence of the two-party system, Bibby states, "Perhaps it is because the United States has operated a political system within the context of stability, consensus, and incremental policy change for so long that its advantages tend to be overlooked and taken for granted" (p. 77). Such longevity exhibited by the two-party system is unheard of in foreign governments. The endurance of this system can be attributed to the sense of unity and legitimacy that it provides United States citizens, along with its "high compatibility with American society, culture, and governmental structures" (Bibby, p. 74). The United States government should continue to encourage the two-party system to ultimately maintain the advantageous relationship it has had with the American public. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Is Britain a two-party or a multi party system, or something else?

    Stephen Ingle in "Britain's Third Party" concurs, stating that "...the Liberals were benefiting from a new kind of voter who did not feel the need to justify his/her voting allegiance by reference to class".11 However, despite this shift to a three, or 'multiparty' system, there is evidence to suggest that this is not the case.

  2. Party system in India

    to almost to zero showed that the BJP's performance was not a one-time affair (see table 2). The rapid expansion in the electoral support for the BJP and sudden increase in the number of its MPs in Parliament, and its ability to forge alliances with several parties to come to power marked the party politics of the 1990s.

  1. What is the best description of the UK party system? Two-party, Three-party, Multi-party or ...

    People are now thinking that Labour might be the new dominant party, it is not possible to say for sure at the moment. But in 1997 despite Labour's huge margin of victory in terms of seats it still only got 43.2% of the vote, this is comparable to the Conservative

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    The Normative Criteria of Evaluation The debate about electoral reform has largely revolved around the practical consequences of incremental changes to the status quo. But underlying these arguments are contested visions about the fundamental principles of representative democracy (see Dunleavy and Margetts 1995).

  1. Analysing The British Political System.

    Much research that followed this model was conducted in the 1950's and 60's, although it is useful in explaining the changes that have taken place since. It was based upon the assumption that social changes shape the way voters identify with particular parties.

  2. Why is corruption so prominent in the contemporary Latin American political scene?

    As it increasingly becomes accepted that there is a strong link between poor economic growth and high levels of corruption, Latin American governments have began to look for ways to attack corruption. Argentina has established the Anti-Corruption Office of Argentina, the aim of which is to establish both preventative and punitive policies to stop corruption, with some success.

  1. Russia - political past, present and future

    The Bolsheviks together with Lenin gained more and more support from the common population, as they were able to establish the "socialistic paradise" and life free of dictatorship in the minds of people who lived lives of uncertainty and hopeless poverty.

  2. President J F Kennedy.

    Although angered by the Embargo Act of Jefferson, the Federalists were even more bitter about the desertion of Adams to the ranks of the "enemy". In this time of need, he turned to his greatest support, his father. In 1808, the Federalist legislature convened in order to pass resolutions instructing

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work