• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Minority parties in Britain call for electoral reform whereas the two major parties tend to favour retaining the existing system. Do you consider that the strengths of proportional representation outweigh the advantages of simple majority voting?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Minority parties in Britain call for electoral reform whereas the two major parties tend to favour retaining the existing system. Do you consider that the strengths of proportional representation outweigh the advantages of simple majority voting? Electoral reform in Britain is an issue that has dogged politics for many years. The object was first raised in 1831 and "attracted support throughout the nineteenth century" (Jones & Kavanagh, 1990). In the last century a proposal nearly gained a Parliamentary majority in 1917, and "the Liberals have favoured replacing the simple plurality system by a system of proportional representation" (Birch, 1991) since 1922. Throughout the last century, it has been the Liberals who have suffered the 'third-party syndrome' perpetually losing out to either the Conservatives, or the Labour party. However, in more recent years the increasing number of minority parties, and their growing support, has brought the concept of reform to the fore again. Indeed, shortly after the current government came to power in 1997, the Prime Minister commissioned the Jenkins Report to examine the possibility of reform. It should also be noted that in the devolved Scottish Parliament the voting system that was chosen to be used is one of representation. ...read more.

Middle

Firstly, it is possible to determine the results of a FPTP election in a matter of hours, compared to some PR elections in which the result may not be known for days or weeks. Secondly, the cost to run a simpler FPTP election is considerably less than running an election based on a complex, more involved PR system. This is not to suggest that the FPTP system is without its faults, indeed it is regarded as being grossly unfair as the votes for the party which does not win are, in effect, wasted. When it is considered that there are millions of 'wasted' votes, this is surely one of the reasons that voter apathy is so rife in Britain with a party wholly in control, the concept of a responsible government is also diminished. voter turnout of 76% at the 1997 election, compared with turnouts over 80% in countries utilising PR systems. The outcome of FPTP elections in Britain are also seen to result in a socially unrepresentational government: for example, if it is assumed that approximately half of the voting population are women, it follows that half of the MPs should be female - this has obviously never been the case. ...read more.

Conclusion

An electoral system based on PR can be seen to be fairer to the electorate as it considers all of the opinions, and it would "allow for free and fair competition between all political parties" (Amy). The current system is clearly biased against the minority parties, and it serves to protect the two major parties from any competition. Certainly, a cynic would see this as the reason for a PR system never having been adopted by a reigning government. Although, fairness appears to be the only principal reason for adopting a PR system, compared to the lengthier list of advantages for a FPTP system, if the FPTP advantages are considered, they cannot be viewed as comparable in terms of importance. As there are several systems based on PR, it must be possible to adopt an existing system, or to develop a system that would both suit Britain, while avoiding many of the objections raised by campaigners for FPTP. Patronising voters by expecting them only to be able to indicate their choice with a cross, and so readily dismissing such a large proportion of the total votes cast can only serve to infuriate the electorate and to indicate that reform of the electoral system in Britain must be considered. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "The British Parliament is weak whereas the US Congress is powerful." Discuss.

    Many Trade and Industry issues, for example, are subject to QMV. Because of QMV, Germany and the UK may be forced to adopt legislation that the minister voted against. European laws are not debated in the House of Commons. (They are, however, sometimes debated in the House of Lords).

  2. Is Britain a two-party or a multi party system, or something else?

    On the other hand, to agree with Heywood that there has been a dominant conservative consensus over the latter of the twentieth century, his argument can still be valid, despite the victories of Labour in 1997, 2001 and 2005 elections.

  1. Evaluate strengths and weaknesses of various voting systems regarding voting

    George Foulkes, a Labour MP and opponent of electoral reform, concludes that: 'Our present voting system at least ensures that government decisions are made by the party which has the most votes - admittedly usually the largest minority. However, experience elsewhere has shown that PR often puts crucial government decisions

  2. To what extent does Britain have a two party system?

    The Labour Party held referendums for devolution in Scotland and Wales soon after they came into power and subsequently a Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly was formed. Since devolution has occurred Scotland and Wales have grown more in favour for nationalist parties.

  1. Using your own knowledge and the evidence of Sources 1, 3 and 5 what ...

    In addition, the Protectorate was successful in foreign policy, although England failed in the Western Design, they capture of Jamaica was beneficial. Also Scotland and Ireland were under firm control. This is supported by J.P.Kenyon who recognises the "military genius" of Cromwell.

  2. What are the main policy areas that divide the Labour and Conservative Parties?

    Over the issue of welfare, the Conservatives have taken a firmer line on benefits fraud, and proposed further tightening on benefits. Labour, although having similar policies, also look to support the child benefit system, single parents who want to work, and provide a minimum level of income for all working

  1. 'Personal and party advantages were the motivating forces for the passing of the 1867 ...

    On 18th June 1866, the amendment was passed. The government lost its majority and resigned. The Queen asked Derby to form a new government. It was under this government that the 1867 Reform Act would be passed. Many historians have questioned the reasons for the Conservatives passing a much more

  2. What are the roles of political parties and how effectively do they carry this ...

    Despite this the public did not believe them and as a result the damage was done. In order to combat sleaze in donations and to allow parties to perform this role more effectively Labour commissioned a investigation called the Neil Report, which said all donations are to be declared publicly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work