• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Nationalism Was More Important As A Product Rather Than A Cause Of National Unification (Breuilly). Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nationalism Was More Important As A Product Rather Than A Cause Of National Unification (Breuilly). Discuss. Nationalism was an indistinct movement that could be seen to have its roots in Medieval Europe in writers such as Dante, Marcu, and Domenichi, but did not manifest itself in the political arena until the mid-19th century. Europe, at this time was in the middle of a period of prolonged social development that had gradually been changing the political and social framework of the continent. One of the more significant and widespread developments between 1815-1914 was the shift in political orientation from the monarchic to the nationalist state via what Sperber calls 'the European Revolutions'. Breuilly defines nationalism as, "political movements seeking or exercising or seeking state power, and justifying such action with nationalist arguments"1. The arguments that nationalists employed took the form of political doctrine built upon three major assumptions. Firstly, that there exists a nation with an explicit and peculiar character, that the interests and values of this nation take priority above those of all others, and that the nation must be as independent as possible (requiring at least political sovereignty). All these assumptions would imply that a part of this political thinking would require a definite entity upon which these nationalist sentiments could be concentrated, in other words, national unification would be necessary. It is therefore apparent that the two, the political mentality and the political act are mutually dependable, but what did national unification change? ...read more.

Middle

France's political outlook had changed drastically in the 200 years before the Great War of 1914. Through revolution, the state had replaced the King as the source of political legitimacy and the will of the nation, i.e. the people, and this was the justification of their acts. Therefore enemies of France were the enemies of the people, implying some sort of ideological national unification. However, this had not been the cause of the initial revolution, which was in effect a bourgeoisie, commercial middle class freeing itself from feudalsim, and not a rebellion of the people. However, what this produced through unification of the people under a common political cause was not only the mobilisation of mass population, but an awareness of France as a unique and remarkable state, something still prevalent in modern day political France, and referred to as 'l'exception francais'. This unification ideologically, along with the advent of the industrial state meant that the return of the monarchy in 1814 and 1815 renewed national sentiment through associating the new monarchy with the enemies of the state - enemies of the people. Hence, the Bourbon Government was overthrown 15 years later, and this act was hailed a national revolution. Post Bourbon France was therefore even more strongly nationalist than it had been before 1815, but nationalism was a product of the first revolution, absent through the persistent segregation of the population, the emphasis being on the majority middle class. ...read more.

Conclusion

As with France, the intervention of foreign powers only served to compound this, making them the enemies of the German people, however geographically fragmented they were at the time. Even if this did not succeed in quite the same capacity as the conservative Frankfurt National Assembly had envisioned, but the mass uprising in response to a political development is characteristic of the growth in political involvement and identification that not only marks national unification but the growth in nationalism. This prevailing sense of a united German people had been developing at least intellectually since the Lutherian Reformation, with a backlash to Papal domination in the Empire. However, 300 years later, it appeared, much strengthened, in the 19th century to be a co-ordinated and mass political statement that went on to affect foreign policy especially in the late 19th and early 20th century, and laying the foundations for the Great Wars, as it had done in France. In both France and Germany's cases national unification came at a time of intense change not only for them but for the rest of Europe, essentially embodying everything from ideology to infrastructure. It is therefore clear that nationalism as a movement was very much a product of national unification. Without a definite entity upon which to concentrate their ideals upon and to elevate as a unique and independent, there could be no focus or principle to a nationalist movement. Post-unification, its part in the formation and reinforcement of the newly consolidated state was fundamental in shaping both domestic and foreign policy in the turbulent 20th century. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Define and discuss an autocratic system of government - While most essays are likely ...

    Leaders such as Hitler monopolized this approach simply because it maneuvers the idea of fear and coercion from the public, all the way to other extreme of absolute endorsement for the governments' policies. In contrast to the supreme rule of a single person; we shall see how autocracy compares to its counterpart-democracy.

  2. The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia

    The opening of government and missionary schools competed directly with the Buddhist schools. The cultural inroads made by the British wee opposed by the Buddhist monks whose monasteries became centres of resentful opposition to the West. 2. The monks or pongyis were also involved in the nationalist movement for when

  1. Why Did Revolutions Break Out so Widely Across Europe in 1848 and Why Did ...

    redrawn the map of Europe, and so this area, along with the Poles, Czechs, Croats and Slovaks of the Habsburg lands was a hotbed of Nationalism, with a desire to throw off foreign rule. These ideological precursors had grown out of patriotic organisations and the publications of texts like Balbo's Summary History of Italy (1846).

  2. Which major domestic and international factors made German unification possible?

    up addressing their roles in German unification, the 2 plus 4 talks occurred which ended up being 3 against 1 with the USSR being that one against the West and China. The USSR however "had some 340,000 troops stationed in the GDR"3 which evidently meant that they could not be ignored from these talks and the demands that they made.

  1. How far do you agree that it was Cavour's diplomacy rather that Garibaldi's ideas ...

    realism...are in some danger of losing our ideals and of forgetting the power of a few fearless men may have in a world where the proportion of cowards and egoists is not small' 6 However, Garibaldi is sometimes criticised by Conservative historians like Cesare Cant´┐Ż for his narrow thought processes and his fondness for military solution.

  2. Assess the impact of the Vikings on the political development of western Europe in ...

    The drawing of lots was a device used frequently for decisions on military matters and involved the input of many minor leaders. When choices had to be made which had an affect on the whole populace it was noted that "all public business is arranged rather by the wish of the whole people than the king"5.

  1. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    6. The First Benazir Government: Benazir who was only 36 year old at the time of assuming the power of Prime Minister of Pakistan was the first woman in modern history to head a government of a Muslim nation. Unfortunately due to lack of political experience, most of the government policies

  2. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    Why should Scotland and Wales be able to influence matters concerning health, education and other issues in England (because they are debated and voted on at Westminster) when issues in Scotland and Wales cannot be influenced by any English politician? These questions are now known as the West Lothian question.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work