• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

New Liberalism and the Rise of the Labour Party

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

New Liberalism and the rise of the Labour Party New Liberalism is a term in political circles that argues for government intervention in economy. This simply means that some people believed in the government helping those that could not help themselves. In the late 19th and early 20th century people reached a certain age and could no longer work - if this was the case they were either looked after by their family or they would go to a poorhouse (also known as an Almshouse) which was supported by wealthy land owners or by the church. The introduction of new liberalism meant that men who worked would now have to start paying a form of what we call today "National Insurance". This would help those who needed it. This included the elderly and the infirm. This is in contrast to traditional liberalism or 'Gladstonian Liberalism' which believed in the Laissez-Faire policy. This meant that the government used economic policies that relied heavily on free trade. ...read more.

Middle

Ultimately, this put the LRC above the law. In 1906 the party had elected twenty nine MPs and renamed themselves "The Labour Party". They experienced all of the usual 'teething' problems of a young party. They elected a Chairman instead of a Leader, experienced financial difficulties and found themselves unable to differentiate from the Liberals whose social reforms helped working class people. By 1914, despite being a better organisation, Labour had not made a big impact and did not seem to pose a major threat to the Liberal Party. Until Britain declared war on Germany in July 1914. The Liberal party began its' decline at the start of the war. The party began to split due to differences between the traditional and new liberalists. The war was very costly and taxes had to be raised to cope with the financial aspects. This went against traditional liberalism which believed in low taxes for the people, thereby causing "dissention in the ranks" so to speak. ...read more.

Conclusion

In his War Memoirs [v 1 p 602], Lloyd George compares himself to Asquith: There are certain indispensable qualities essential to the Chief Minister of the Crown in a great war. . . . Such a minister must have courage, composure, and judgment. All this Mr. Asquith possessed in a superlative degree. . . . But a war minister must also have vision, imagination and initiative--he must show untiring assiduity, must exercise constant oversight and supervision of every sphere of war activity, must possess driving force to energize this activity, must be in continuous consultation with experts, official and unofficial, as to the best means of utilising the resources of the country in conjunction with the Allies for the achievement of victory. If to this can be added a flair for conducting a great fight, then you have an ideal War Minister. It seems that even long after the war Lloyd George felt the need to smear Asquiths' leadership methods during the First World War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Discuss the Persuasive Techniques Used in the "New Labour, New Danger" Party Political Broadcast"

    For example in the last scene the eyes look down threateningly on Parliament, the British symbol of democracy and power; and a young police officer. This is used visual metaphor of what the voice-over saying to increase the impact of his words; "Labour intend to slowly give away Britain's power

  2. How significant was The First World War in the Labour Party's rise to second-party ...

    if they had had the opportunity."1 Laybourn points out that "the First World War was responsible for significant political and social change" creating the correct environment for Labour after 1918, and that enfranchisement merely reflected these changes. The Fourth Reform Act was "the biggest working class enfranchisement ever to be

  1. How far was the First World War responsible for the growth of the Labour ...

    in the government, which eventually led to the Decline of the Liberals since it were the Conservatives who had polled the most support in the 1918 "Coupon Election" and not the Liberals. On the other hand, it can be argued that the First World War was not solely responsible for

  2. Did the Labour Party show that it could govern Britain competently in the years ...

    The Conservatives complained that the withdrawal had been politically motivated, ie - Labour was interfering with the course of justice and perhaps even supporting extreme left-wing views. Asquith called for the appointment of a committee of enquiry. This would have taken some time to report and so would have allowed the Labour Government to survive.

  1. Is New Labour a Conservative Party?

    So the Thatcher government began a succession of extensive privatizations in 1981 with British Telecom. Thatcher envisaged these initiatives would be a good way of putting a stop to the unavoidable conflict of interests between owners and workers.

  2. With reference to material you have studied discuss the major policy differences between the ...

    The UUP, however, took an active part in government. They sat in the Executive with Sinn Fein and attended NSMC meetings, however, in September 2002, the party refused to attend any North South meetings due to Sinn Fein's lack of progress in encouraging the IRA to abandon its paramilitary path.

  1. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    That is why it argues for complete state control of the economy. Democratic Socialists (the Attlee government), however, accepted the post-war consensus and hence accepted the mixed economy and Keynesian policies, where Keynes advocated "some government economic intervention and planning in order to achieve economic stability, growth and full employment".

  2. Why were the 1930's a decade of disappointment for the labour party?

    It was important to look at the 1920's leadership as the comparison between the successful decade and the unsuccessful heightens the sense of disappointment for the unsuccessful- the 1930's. Another important reason as to why the 1930's was a decade of disappointment were the various internal conflicts and divisions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work