• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Niccolo Machiavelli. His views revolved around the ideas that one must do anything within his power to keep the influence and strength that he has attained. And according to him, this is best achieved by keeping the people in constant fear.

Extracts from this document...


One of the most famous philosophers of the 15th century is the Florentine Niccolo Machiavelli. Notorious for his almost radical stand on leadership, Machiavelli was one of the first philosophers to break free from "ethical" constraints. Born in 1946, Europe at the time of Machiavelli was in political upheaval. The Church's power was in decline, losing its power as unifying government, Spain and France were pushing their way in Italy, and Italy itself was a melange of bickering city-states. This climate of political uncertainty greatly affected Machiavelli's political theories. Furthermore, Machiavelli's two main books were written after he was forced to retire from his job by the establishment of a tyranny in Florence by Lorenzo Medici. From his position in the foreign office, Machiavelli went into exile on a farm, where he remained to his dying day. Disillusioned by the state of his country as well as his personal life, Machiavelli wrote two books entitled Discourses and The Prince, which were instructional books on running a state. His views revolved around the ideas that one must do anything within his power to keep the influence and strength that he has attained. And according to him, this is best achieved by keeping the people in constant fear. Without fear, the trust that they have in their leader will whither and they will start to look for others to take the place of the one that they believe to be weak. ...read more.


Machiavelli tells us that the sovereign must take whatever action is necessary to maintain order in society. In time this will result in the most compassionate choice too. Machiavelli explains that, Cesare Borgia, by using cruelty was able to achieve order and obedience in Romangna. This contrast with the inaction of the Florentines, who allowed internal conflict to develop in Pistoia, resulting in devastation of the city. Therefore, a number of highly visible executions can be a very effective means of controlling the people and in preventing a major out break of violence and murder. Machiavelli also uses the tremendous military successes of Hannibal as an example to show us that even though Hannibal led an army of different races over foreign soil, he never had any dissension because of his reputation of extreme cruelty. Machiavelli beleived that it would be difficult to be loved and feared simultaneously. Hence, one should always prefer to be feared than to be loved. During adverse times, the fear of punishment is far more effective in maintaining control than depending upon people's goodwill and love. The Prince: - Machiavelli's book The Prince deals with the making of a society in which the people are corrupt. "Machiavelli freely prescribes for the man who wishes to acquire power and glory in a corrupt republic by becoming a tyrant rather than a public-spirited reformer."4 Addressed to Lorenzo De Medici (the new ruler of Florence), The Prince's aim is to tell a ruler how to become a good tyrant. ...read more.


Basically Machiavelli is telling the prince to always be prepared for the unknown, and not believe himself to be invincible. Another piece of advice Machiavelli gives to the prince is to always keep up with the times. Appear as your peers do, and go with the flow. A modern day example of Machiavelli's philosophy is the UN bombing of Kosovo. The means of bombing cities and killing civilians for the end of overthrowing Slobodon Milosovich, seems to fulfil the Machiavellian criteria. Another example, that to me seems to have Machiavellian undertones is the American nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, during World War II. Wiping out entire cities is considered cruel and unusual tactics; however, it led to the end of the war, hence justifying the means. Today success is still to those who can make quick and intelligent choices. The government is still supported most by its amount of power. However, countries are held accountable today, and few would agree that "the end justifies the means"6. Citation * William T, Bluhm, Theories of the Political System * http://www.orst.edu/instruct/phl302/philosophers/machaivelli.html * http://www.lucidcafe.com/library/96may/machiavelli.html Machiavelli's contributions to Political Theory Sherna Shroff I.D. - 1655 Introduction to politics Mrs. Sandra Madi 21st October 2002 1 Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince, translated Thomas Bergin, P.44 2 Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince, translated Thomas Bergin, P.44 3 Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince, translated Thomas Bergin 4 William T, Bluhm, Theories of the Political System, Pg.213 5 William T, Bluhm, Theories of the Political System, Pg.215 6 Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince, translated Thomas Bergin ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. 'Liberal pluralist views of policy making are hopelessly naïve.' Discuss.

    Politics and Markets New York: Basic Books Martin J. Smith (1990) 'Pluralism, Reformed Pluralism and Neo-pluralism: the Role of Pressure Groups in Policy-Making' Political Studies, XXXXVIII, pp302 - 322 Manley J. F (1983) 'Neo-Pluralism: A Class Analysis of Pluralism Iand Pluralism ?', The American Political Science Review, 77, pp368-383 Richardson J.J & A.

  2. How far do you agree that it was Cavour's diplomacy rather that Garibaldi's ideas ...

    In 1858 negotiations between Cavour and Napoleon resulted in the Plombieres Agreement that became crucial for unification.

  1. The ending of White minority rule was achieved solely by Nelson Mandela. Do you ...

    There are several theories to explain why de Klerk halted the system. According to de Klerk's close friends, it is exclaimed that de Klerk received a "calling from God", to save the people of South Africa.

  2. The conflict may be classified as a strike for power between Taliban government and ...

    The Taliban rigid Islam with aspects of anti-Sufi and anti-Shia fundamentalism is in alien to the moderate Islam practiced by most Afghans, who make up more than half the population.20 Another incompatibility is rather between the Taliban government and international community, particularly, the USA.

  1. Free essay

    Why keep the Cons. in the 1960s

    Where the Conservatives, were the party of influence, which was making the public grow keener on maintaining Conservative power. Improving economic conditions and relatively rapid rates of growth in the middle of the 1950s undoubtedly helped to ensure the party's re-election in 1955, and again in 1959.

  2. World war one propaganda

    Here moral superiority is used to encourage the home front to remain steadfast. In response to the question, perhaps the hatred of the enemy wasn't the main objective rather an amalgamation of factors, I will go on to explain this further.

  1. It is not enough for governments to have power, they must also have authority

    The faculty of having power can give an institution the right or the authority to use it. In a dictatorship it is arguable that the leader can have power without authority, as even though the people may disagree they are too fearful of what will happen if they do not obey the government at the time.

  2. Have Prior Reforms Of The Lords Been Effective And Can Anything Further Be Done ...

    Another point of the lords that is criticised, and again an important point in the matter of reform, is that the Law lords can both make and scrutinise the law, this is in complete contrast to the United States who have a separation of powers built into their clearly written and defined constitution (US Politics Today, E.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work