• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

On 3rd May 1926, the Trades Union Congress (TUC) called three million workers out on strike to support the coal miners locked out by their employers.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

On 3rd May 1926, the Trades Union Congress (TUC) called three million workers out on strike to support the coal miners locked out by their employers. The strike lasted nine days. There were three main causes to this General Strike: Britain's economic crisis, problems in the coal industry, and Government policy towards industrial relations. The root cause of the General Strike, however, was the conflict within the coal industry. In the spring of 1920, Britain had experienced its worst economic slump, caused by poor performance in foreign markets; lack of investment and modernization in British industry, and increased competition abroad. Britain's coal industry was trading less in 1925 than before the 1914-18 war. The Government attempted to stabilise the economy by reintroducing the Gold Standard in 1925. Unfortunately, they overestimated the value of sterling by 10%, increasing the problems of British industry. The economic situation, however, had not deteriorated to the extent that a general strike was unavoidable. ...read more.

Middle

This is why it can be argued that the coal industry was the catalyst to the General Strike. It took extreme exploitation of mineworkers for the TUC to decide to act. The TUC's involvement signalled a turning point. Initially, the government also kept out of the coal dispute. When, in 1925, the TUC threatened to support the mineworkers, though, the government provided a �23million in coal industry subsidies. A strike was temporarily avoided. The subsidy, though, was only for nine months. During this time, the government appointed Samuel Commission investigated the problems of British mining and its low productivity. Samuel reported in 1926. The report rejected nationalisation, but recognised a need for modernisation. It recommended the withdrawal of subsidies and cuts to miners' wages. The government would accept the recommendations if both sides agreed. This was unrealistic: the report suggested things that neither party would agree. The conflict returned to the same position as before. ...read more.

Conclusion

It has been argued that if he had enforced its findings, the General Strike would have been averted. Another view is that implementation of the Samuel report would have worsened the dispute between miners and mine owners. Baldwin could not win. The government's response did not cause the General Strike - but it did nothing to prevent it. The general strike of 1926 was caused by a combination of economic crisis, a crippled coal industry, and a poor government response. British industry was moribund and the government could have reacted more responsibly to the needs of the workers. But these were additional to the underlying conflicts in the coal industry. The miners were extremely unhappy with their dire working conditions and failure to nationalise the industry. They refused to accept lower wages and longer hours. The treatment of the miners made the TUC act. I think that the mine owners' proposals for lower wages and longer hours were the catalyst for the General Strike. If it weren't for that, it would've taken longer or never happened. Frankie Hine-Hughes History coursework 858 Why did the General strike of 1926 take place? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 fail and what were the effects the ...

    saw a general strike as a revolutionary challenge for the constitution and the economic system. Although the British Labour movement had never been really committed to this idea, during the post-war boom when it was on the offensive, there were two examples of semi-syndicalist conceptions concerning the use of industrial

  2. The conflict may be classified as a strike for power between Taliban government and ...

    Both sides agreed in principle to establish a broad-based government with a shared executive, legislature and judiciary. Nevertheless, in early April grave fights broke out in several provinces, they intensified in August and September. The peace negotiations were considered to have collapsed.29 In mid-December 2000 Taliban and UIFSA held indirect

  1. HUMANITIES COURSEWORK

    However, from a Palestinian point of view, they call the wall "Apartheid Wall" or "The Wall of Hate". They had this view because they think this wall was designed to "choke" Palestinians and to take them away from their livelihood.

  2. What Where Causes And Consequences Of The General Strike In 1926?

    Most miners hoped that all mines would remain nationalised after the war; however in 1921 Lloyd George allowed the mines to go back into private ownership. This was because the royal Commission couldn't agree on a suitable solution to the problems in the coal-mining industry.

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    The government did take action though, by giving a subsidy to maintain existing wage levels for the miners.

  2. WWI, The Twenty-One Demands and The May Fourth Movement

    national heritage with scientific methods...to recreate civilisation".8 Although conservatives strongly opposed such a measure, the social atmosphere encouraged change, with the government eventually allowing Hu's new style of writing to be adopted in schools in 1920. University students, with a wider understanding of western social philosophy than the older conservatives,

  1. Did Paul Lahti, the director of the Minahasa Raya mine, make the correct decision ...

    (Times Picuyane 5) These are just a few reasons as to which I feel he made the correct decision by not reopening the mine in Minahasa. More evidence as to why the closing of the Minahasa Raya mine was good fro Newmont is the illegal mining that was going on taking away from their business.

  2. Lord Grey, writing the British Gazzette in May 1926, said of the General Strike, ...

    The strike was simply an industrial dispute and the General Council was keen to make it appear as respectable as possible. They even declined a donation from Russian trade unions of 2 million roubles, the equivalent of �26,000.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work