• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"On Why We Are Better", Developmental Differences between the US and Mexico.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"On Why We Are Better" Developmental Differences between the US and Mexico Neighbors following a similar political course in the mid and later twentieth century, it could have been thought that the United States and Mexico would follow similar paths from their fights to be independent, however, nothing more peculiarly different could have been the case. Due mainly to the causes and effects of essential political, religious and economic differences between the two lands, one country would go on to become a superpower while the other would be greatly lesser fortunate and remain in a state of unrest even today. From the very beginning, the US was simply a very fortunate country in the decisions it made; through its economic, political and religious decisions, the United States of America was able to make progress that would send the US skyrocketing past Mexico. Perhaps to look at the development of these two countries as countries, one must first consider their development as colonies and the reasons for which each marched towards revolution. With the US owing its allegiance to Great Britain, America supported Britain monetarily, however, in return, that was the general end to relationships with England. The American colonies were free to live their lives as they pleased. ...read more.

Middle

power over them, and as the colonies argued whether they would have a national religion, the idea of religion became a huge divisive factor for the new country. Such a fundamental difference would become a crucial difference between the two countries, and this is simply the beginning of the developmental differences between the two countries. Then there was the economic aspect of life in the two countries. From the very beginning, America was in every sense of the phrase a genuine "melting pot." With inhabitants coming from all over Europe, the United States had ties to an entire continent; Mexico on the other hand was founded entirely by the Spanish and as such, could only legitimately turn to that empire for aid. As such, when Mexico decided to break away from Spain and fight for their independence, they were forced to rely on themselves for the majority of support services. Quite contrarily, the US was immediately recognized as a country and aided by several nations overseas, with Morocco and France being the earliest and most notable, respectively. Furthermore, these ties to Europe would prove crucial as the countries began to grow. With the Napoleonic Wars raging, the demand for goods was prevalent, and with the US having these ties to European countries where Mexico lacked, the United States were able to create a strong system of exportation and trade that sent their economy skyrocketing towards success. ...read more.

Conclusion

This lack of a hierarchy also had far-reaching effects on Mexico's political action as well, for with this lack of structure came political leaders from any walk of life. This also meant problems for Mexico, as the leaders would generally turn to military force to rule the countries. Political insurrection was not uncommon at all, and with Mexico's love for military force, these bloody rebellions led to nearly commonplace military coups and heightened the overall sense of political instability that would plague the country for countless years to come. In summation, there were several factors that helped create the two countries we know today as the United States and Mexico. While Mexico emerged from its colonial days with ties only to its motherland of Spain, the US had relationships with many countries in Europe. In turn, the US was able to create a strong trade system and economy while Mexico was forced to rely on inter-continental trade and a struggling economy for success. Furthermore, while the US kept a strong policy of separation of church and state, Mexico allowed extensive debate on establishment of a national religion. These factors, combined with the actual aims of the revolutions of the two countries led to the different trajectories that made the US a highly successful superpower and left Mexico struggling to create a stable economy and government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    Few days after the daughter of a shoemaker died in Valetta although the diagnosed didn't show any plague symptoms. The doctors were afraid of saying it was plague, as in May 1813 the mother and the father of the girl died.

  2. Slavery in Latin America

    After four years of pro-Axis neutrality, Argentina belatedly (Mar., 1945) entered World War II on the side of the Allies and became a member of the United Nations. A return to liberal government momentarily seemed probable, but Per�n was overwhelmingly victorious in the election of Feb., 1946.

  1. Key furnishings in the Catholic Church and what they tell us about the catholic ...

    Another serious problem was that the Whigs had left a deficit of over �2,000,000. Peel wanted to solve all this problems and tackle poverty. Peel summed up his aims with a couple of sentences, "We must make this country a cheap country for living, and thus induce people to remain

  2. The Mexican Economy

    Mexico has been rocked by political rebellion during most of its entire history in one way or another. Under the various dictatorships that Mexico found itself under at times in history, it made tremendous advances in economic and commercial development.

  1. Assess the Extent to which the Different Powers Prepared 'Their' African Colonies for Independence.

    Post decolonisation in 1960 Botswana, in a political sense, inherited a Westminster parliamentary system along with a legal system based on the British legal framework of precedence whilst incorporating tribal law and customs. Botswana, like Nigeria, had a huge economic resource in its diamond mines which attracted a lot of

  2. Prospects for India's development

    Nor can India broker peace because its historic policy of non-compromise on the "internal" issue of Kashmir dictates that a compromise on the question would seal the doom of the new coalition (see following section on domestic politics for more information).

  1. The Rise and fall of the Ottoman Empire.

    No matter how much territory was won by the Ottomans, Constantinople still resisted every siege and invasion. The Ottomans greatly wanted the city for it would both represent a huge symbol of Ottoman, and Islamic power, but also gain the Empire all East-West trade.

  2. The colonial factor in the Nigerian civil war (1967-1970)

    This unfortunate yet obvious fact notwithstanding, the former colonial master had to keep the country one in order to effectively control his vital economic interests concentrated mainly in the more advanced and "politically reliable" south. Thus for administrative reasons, the Northern and southern parts of Nigeria was amalgamated in 1914.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work