• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the arguments for Parliamentary Reform.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline the arguments for Parliamentary Reform It has been argued over the years, especially since Labour came into power, that the issue of parliamentary reform needs to be raised particularly in certain aspects concerning the House of Lords. Within the House of Commons there are two types of committee, they are official and unofficial and they can be further subdivided. The two principle types are the standing and select committees, though the house also makes use of a form of hybrid, know as special standing committees. When a Bill has received its second reading, it reaches the committee stage. The Bill is then sent to a standing committee who examine the details of a bill within the confines of the Bill's general principles which are approved at the second reading. ...read more.

Middle

Another Criticism and reason for reform is relevant to legislature. Parliament retains legislative power. Without parliament the government cannot pass its legislative programme. Due to out First Past the post electoral system there is a clear domination of Parliament. The amount of seats in parliament a party gets is not reflective of the percentage of votes, but it is worked out on how many constituencies they party have gathered. So it is possible to have a minority Parliament. The domination of the commons by a huge majority party could be seen to undermine the key role of parliament being needed for the government to pass legislation. It is argued that a parliament isn't needed because there will always be such a huge majority that anything the government wants they get. ...read more.

Conclusion

Parliament was regarded an effective body and much of the work is done by committees rather than on the floor, but often the debates are controlled or cut short. Only recently has question time been reduced to once a week, which makes the PMs and MPs bombardment predictable and less scrutinising. Recently the Labour party has been dealing with the matter of the House of Lords and the abolishment of its hereditary peers. Many people feel that it is about time for reform to take place over the House of Lords. It is argued that it is unfair to have such political powers just through blood. The main criticism of the unreformed House of Lords is that, as an unelected body that is not accountable to the electorate, it is an undemocratic institution. The Labour party wishes to reduce the umber of hereditary peers to 92 and to convert a number more into life peers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Electoral Reform

    Disagreements arise in coalition or minority governments making it extremely difficult to govern the country. FPTP normally gives a strong and stable government unlike in Israel where the Party List system in used and has formed a weak and unstable government which is unsuccessful in combating the intense difficulties in

  2. The need for reform

    These small, local schemes raised the possibility of similar schemes being a success on a national scale. The beginnings of reform From the turn of the 20th century, laissez faire (the policy of non-intervention in relation to social problems) became discredited.

  1. Have Prior Reforms Of The Lords Been Effective And Can Anything Further Be Done ...

    class males so it is difficult for their views to align with the majority of the British public. In comparison to the US, the judiciary is kept separate to the executive and plays no part in legislation making function, however, they are nominated for positions, such as Supreme Court Justices, by the President.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    costs, waste and efficiency because funding comes from what is commonly perceived to be a bottom-less public purse. Public spending under the post-war consensus was constantly rising and had to be paid for in high taxes which reduced individual incentives to work.

  1. What are the arguments for and against electing all the members of the second ...

    This could result in the Conservative element of the house making it extremely difficult and significantly delaying any bills bought forward by a Labour government. This potentially hinders the political process and the impartiality required of a house that finalises and debates matters of public interest in a democratic state in the 21st century.

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    obtaining all of the legislative seats at the national level despite nearly half of the voters not supporting the winners. With a PR system, the winning party in this scenario would obtain close to 51 percent of the seats, while the other successful parties who met a given threshold would share the remaining percentage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work