• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Parliamentary Democracy

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Parliamentary Democracy Parliament is dissolved! But who dissolved them? Who elected parliament? By the voters of great Britain an Ireland. Was it then the voters of great Britain an Ireland who made parliament dissolve? No, it was the Prime Minster of England, whom the queen elected who under the laws of his country is incapable of being an MP an he was the person who has the power of putting an end to the deliberations of parliament and disposing of its members. The situation is highly illustrative of many anomalies and absurdities with in the English Constitution. Praised by its supporters as the most perfect constitution yet evolved it is in reality so full of illogical and apparently impossible conditions that if shown to reasoning minds as the basis of a workable constitution for any country it would be dismissed straight away. ...read more.

Middle

The cabinet formed out of the most votes constitutes the government of the country and such has full control of every thing. But the cabinet is not elected by the parliament, voted for by the people nor chosen by its own party. The cabinet is chosen by a group of people chosen by the sovereign as the leader of the strongest party. This person so chosen after a consultation with the queen selects certain of his own followers and creates places for them and salaries, and so forms the cabinet. The cabinet controls the government and practically dictates the laws, yet the cabinet its self is unknown it the law and is not recognised by the constitution. In fact the Cabinet has no legal right to existence. ...read more.

Conclusion

The democracy of parliament is in short the democracy of Capitalism. Capitalism gives the right to the worker to choose his master, but the master ship and doings of the master shall remain unquestioned. Parliament democracy gives the worker the right of voice but insists that he shall bend as a subject to be ruled. The fundamental feature of both to the worker is that they imply his continued subjection to a ruling class once his choice of then personnel of rulers is made. But the freedom of the revolutionists will change the choose of rulers, which we have today into the choice of administrators of law voted upon, directly by the people. And will also substitute the choice of masters the appointment of reliable public servants under direct public control. This will mean true democracy the industrial democracy of the socialist republic ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Northern Ireland Sources Question

    being sent to England and by this stage it was to late to get any more equipment as there was a general shortage. The government also didn't want the public to know about the shortage of domestic shelters, I know that the government didn't think that peoples lives were more

  2. Representation and Democracy in Britain 1830 – 1931

    its peak and so the Conservatives decided to make a play for popularity and introduce reform while "dishing the Liberals". Derby and Disraeli were both willing to introduce a more drastic bill than Gladstone if it would give them a long spell in power.

  1. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    This is the strongest argument in favour of democracy, allowing citizens to have the right to get rid of their rulers. In this sense this could lead to anarchy as citizens have the power to overthrow government with their own intentions in mind.

  2. American Democracy: An Ongoing Experiment

    Our founding fathers answered this challenge as best they could, yet, let us not forget that American democracy was started as, and continues to be, an experiment. Karl Marx once said, "Men make their own history, but they do not make it just as they please: they do not make

  1. Evaluate the development of democracy in Britain from 1867 to the out break of ...

    Some P.M.s also thought that the aristocracy of labour were now responsible and intelligent enough to be included in the franchise, without the fear of producing radicals or revolutionaries as a result. The Reform Act aimed increase the franchise by lower and widen the property qualifications Thereby adding significant numbers

  2. To what extent was the 1867 Reform Act a turning point in parliamentary democracy ...

    It is the cumulative effect of the reforms that brought us to where we are today, and it would be absurd to propose that in 1832 we might have adopted 'universal suffrage' (although a minority of campaigners such as Hunt however, argued for women to be enfranchised in 1830).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work