• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Parnell and the Irish Parliamentary Party 1882-5 After the Kilmainham Treaty Parnell was determined to turn the Home Rule group

Extracts from this document...


Parnell and the Irish Parliamentary Party 1882-5 After the Kilmainham Treaty Parnell was determined to turn the Home Rule group in the House of Commons to turn the Home Rule group in the House of Commons into a powerful, unified Irish Party, subject completely to his own personal authority. At the same time, he intended to make the Irish Parliamentary Party the dominant nationalist organisation in Ireland. The National League The latter aim was forwarded by the creation of the National League in October 1882. Its first aim was 'national self-government', and it intended to win support among all classes of Irish society and not just the farmers. The National League's central organisation was dominated by Parnell and his followers. It soon possessed over 1000 branches throughout Ireland. This increasing identification between the Irish Parliamentary Party and the cause of Irish nationalism was reflected - by the unofficial alliance between the Irish Catholic Church leaders and Parnell in 1885-6. The Church now came out in support of Home Rule, and in return Parnell was prepared to go along with the Church's policies on education. Parnell's influence As far as the Irish Party (MPs) at Westminster was concerned, Parnell now imposed greater discipline and centralisation. However, by the mid-1880s, Parnell completely dominated the Irish Party. By 1885, his efforts on behalf the Irish Parliamentary Party and the national cause generally seemed to have been successful. ...read more.


This avoided the complicated problem of deciding what debates they should be allowed to attend of they remained members of the House of Commons. The second Bill The second Bill consisted of a land purchase scheme by which the British Treasury would buy out the landlords at a cost of some �50 million. Gladstone believed this was essential in order to prevent the new Irish legislature being burdened at the outset with the problems of the Irish land system.The Prime Minister presented his Home Rule Bill to the House of Commons on 8 April 1886. The Land Purchase Bill was soon abandoned when it became apparent that it was unpopular with all sections of opinion in the House. The debates which followed centred therefore on the provisions concerning the government of Ireland. Gladstone elaborated in greater detail the main reasons which had led him to adopt Home Rule, and the solutions he proposed. Reaction to the Bill The bulk of the members of the Parliamentary Liberal Party supported Gladstone. Parnell had doubts about some of the details, particularly the financial provisions, which he believed were unfair to Ireland; but he supported the Home Rule Bill. 'I accepted the Bill', he pronounced and I believe the Irish people will accept it'. But the Bill was bitterly attacked by the Conservatives, and by many leading Liberals, such as Joseph Chamberlain. ...read more.


Parnell's achievements Charles Stewart Parnell was a controversial figure in his lifetime, and he has remained so ever since. Yet most historians are now agreed on the nature of his contribution to Anglo-Irish history. For though Parnell was associated with the Land League, he was pre-eminently a practical politician than an agrarian reformer. In the political field his achievement was two-fold. Making Home Rule a realistic aim. He turned the question of Home Rule from a vague ideal into practical politics. By his belief that it must be worked for and could be achieved constitutionally through the British parliament. Parnell was eventually able to convince the majority of the Irish people that Home Rule was both a just and a feasible solution to the problem of Irish government. Moreover, it was his consistent and convincing support for Home Rule - that helped to clinch Gladstone's conversion to that cause. Uniting the Irish Parliamentary Party Parnell's second great political achievement: his creation of a united, disciplined Irish Parliamentary Party backed up by an efficient electoral machine in Ireland itself. The Irish Party under Parnell's leadership played a key role in British politics and in the history of the Irish question during the 1880s. After Parnell's death in 1891 the Irish Parliamentary Party - divided and leaderless - was only a shadow of its former self. ?? ?? ?? ?? Laura Rea 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The Successes and Failures of Charles Stuart Parnell!

    In 1881, a "Land Act" was issued. Parnell ordered the tenants not to accept this, as it did not include all aspects of the agreement. After this, the "Land War" Became even more violent.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    At Mdina a council met and it was guaranteed by Vabois that the French would respect the rights of the Maltese. As a result on the 13th of June 1798 the knights were sent out. The day before this one we had the capitulation of the Order of St.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    one more vote than their closest rivals. Hence in seats where the vote splits almost equally three ways, the winning candidate may have only 35% of the vote, while the other contestants get 34% and 32% respectively. Although two-thirds of voters supported other candidates, the plurality of votes is decisive.

  2. Critically examine how Mahatma Gandhi used the concept of non-violence as a practical tool ...

    Shortly after this advice the government sent Louis Mountbatten to negotiate a swift departure. It was no longer in Britain's own interests to remain in India. What tends to be obscured in all the attention given to Gandhi and the nationalist movement is that the Raj held firm, despite nationalist

  1. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    The population of Ireland in 1800 was five million. However this had been rapidly expanding since 1815 to its 1841 level of over eight million souls. This had caused increased pressure on land, and holdings were divided into smaller and smaller lots, with increased competition for tenancies. With such a rapid increase in population in a mostly non-industrialized society

  2. Free essay

    Outline the principal sources of authority available to US presidents. How similar is executive ...

    Executive power of the federal government is vested in the president. He has the power to appoint ambassadors, members of the cabinet, Justices of the Supreme Court and Judges of lower federal courts, with the advice and consent of the senate.

  1. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    To avoid embarrassment Pitt declined the offer, knowing he would not have a majority vote in the House of Commons. This gave the King no alternative but to commission Lord North and Charles Fox to reassemble in Parliament as Government. By doing so, Pitt brought forward the question of reform.

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    However, given the undesirability of a Tory government O'Connell could not exert too much pressure on the fragile Whig government. Given the opposition to Irish reform on both sides of the House of Commons perhaps acts such as the ineffective Irish Tithe Commutation Act were as much as could be

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work