• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Peel and the Tory party: 1829 - 1841.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Peel and the Tory party: 1829 - 1841 It is fair to say that in his actions and policies, Peel was the one man most responsible for the Tory party's victory at the 1841 election. Only a man of his skill and ability could have lifted the party out of its troubled situation created in the years after Liverpool's departure from government. Potentially major differences within the party had only been suppressed by Liverpool's line of moderation that addressed liberal and reactionary demands, while leaving controversial topics like Ireland and parliamentary reform open. His successors did not follow his ideology, and lost the party the support and status that Liverpool had so carefully attained. George Canning succeeded Liverpool as Tory Prime Minister in 1827, yet his pro-Ireland stance immediately alienated the reactionary ranks of the Tories from his support base, causing him to resign. Viscount Goodrich was an incompetent and weak prime minister, who buckled under the strain of leadership and resigned almost at once. The Duke of Wellington, although supported by the Ultra-Tories was alienating the party from the public by dismissing the credibility of parliamentary reform, and the Tory party was defeated by the Whigs in the general election 175 Tory seats to 441 Whig seats. Here we see the Conservatives at their lowest point. Peel was the only credible candidate for the Tory leadership, and began his long-term campaign to restore the fortunes of the Conservative party. ...read more.

Middle

Although little was achieved in terms of legislation, it showed the progress made by the Tory party in reclaiming much of their previous status. It also showed the Tory party had backed a winner in the form of Peel. He performed with skill, competency and confidence as the Prime Minister for his short period of office. He had to step down, however, as the Whigs, Radicals and Irish formed the Lichfield House Compact in March 1835, uniting the Opposition under one banner. With such an overwhelming minority in government, Peel chose to resign from office, and so Melbourne was re-appointed as premier in 8th April 1835. However, this did not dishearten the Tory party, and even the grumbling Ultras relented to Peel's leadership. It was becoming clear that Peel would soon re-enter government as the Prime Minister once a solid Tory majority had been formed. It was becoming apparent around this time that the influence of the Whigs was on the decline. The radicals and Irish dissenters were pushing the Whig party down paths that the majority of the electorate wanted closed. Lord John Russell's Irish Tithe Bill among others turned devout Anglicans and deep-rooted Establishment supporters to the Tory party, where Peel still prized the relationship between the Anglican Church and the State. The King was starting to tire of the Whigs, and he and all the influence he commanded were now behind Peel. ...read more.

Conclusion

Yet it seemed that it was the failings of the Whig party that really gave the Tory party the country. The Whigs had alienated almost all prominent sectors of support from their ranks. Their dealings with Ireland gave them added support in Ireland, yet turned away many devout Anglican voters. The questioning of the Corn Laws gave everyone earning from domestic agriculture a reason to choose Peel over the Whigs. Their mishandling of the economy and the failings of the 1832 Whig Reform Act rallied the working classes and their middle class leaders against them through Chartism. The huge budget deficit humiliated Melbourne to the extent that few of the electorate could see anything worth voting for in him. For all Peel made of the middle class vote, historians such as Paul Adelman have pointed out that votes came from the traditional areas of Southern England and Wales rather than the industrial North, suggesting a lack of enthusiasm or confidence from the majority of the middle class industrialists. Peel did offer a welcome alternative to the incompetency of the Whigs, but the majority of votes were from the traditional Tory bastions such as supporters of the Establishment, the Monarchy, the Church and the landed gentry, that almost always voted ambiguously for the Tory party. Votes from new areas were on the whole fuelled by a general dislike of the stale Whig party and their Irish and radical associations, rather than what Peel and his modern breed of Conservatism stood for. Peter Stonor Mr.Kovacevic 6C3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent was ‘Inept Leadership’ responsible for the failure of Chartism?

    However, these middle classes could have proven to be treacherous towards the working classes after the various Acts in the early 1840s. A contribution to failure here is more due to the perception of the well-supported 'physical force' Chartism as being a sign that the working classes were somehow 'unready' for the vote.

  2. The weakness of the Whig government from 1835-1841 was the most important reason for ...

    Additionally, the Whigs further caused their own downfall by eliminating the pressure groups such as benthamites and evangelicals. The Whigs were clearly ignoring the requests of the working population and they did not acknowledge the inadequacies in the society. The failure of the Whig government to take any action for

  1. How successful was Lord Liverpool in responding to radical challenge from 1812-1822?

    The government saw this as a wake up call and had to introduce these policies or a revolution would take place they had to nip revolution in the bud. As a direct result of the Seditious Meeting Act, in the same month there where large scale gatherings for political purposes were banned.

  2. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    take in declaring he had devised his scheme of repeal without caring whether or not he would receive the support of the backbenchers. It is this arrogance and failure to look to see the future consequences of his actions that made Peel such a danger to his party and inevitably was one of the reasons the split occurred.

  1. To What Extent Was Peel's Reorganisation of the Tory Party responsible for the election ...

    Carefully maintaining established Tory principles, Peel recognised that the middle classes were more important than ever and that party policies needed to reflect the traditional values but also embrace the new industrial society. The Tamworth Manifesto affirmed Peel's positive attitude to reform, whilst establishing a consistent policy within his own party.

  2. Conservative Victory of 1941, Peel and the Weakness of the Whigs.

    This saw a repetition of the violence that occurred in the beginning of the decade and Chartism was growing steadily. At this time, the situation was worsened further by Britain being in a state of economic depression which was leading to unemployment and an increase in the prices of food.

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    with the industrialist rather than being as statesman that he is often proclaimed to be. The Factory Act (1844) highlighted some of the poorest administration ever seen in Peel time as Prime Minister. The Factory Act didn't get of to a good start within the conservative party this was because

  2. What was Chartism and why did it fail

    all the Irish Charm and wit as Edward Royle described him as living 'closer to their hearts' (of chartists) when compared to Lovett. Anthony wood prefers the manner of Lovett and says that he 'emerges as the most prophetic figure in the chartist movement'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work