• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Personal and party advantages were the motivating forces for the passing of the 1867 reform bill.' Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Personal and party advantages were the motivating forces for the passing of the 1867 reform bill.' Discuss. In 1867 a Conservative government passed what was a fairly radical Reform Bill, enfranchising a further 1.2 million adult males. This was only a year after the party had campaigned against a less radical bill put forward by the Liberal government of the time. Obviously there was either a change in the Conservative mindset brought on by either inside or outside pressure, or there were benefits for the Conservatives to pass such a bill themselves. It is certainly true to say that Disraeli and the Conservative party had much to gain from the Reform Bill of 1867, but it is also possible that public pressure compelled them to act quickly and radically. In 1846, the Prime Minister, Sir Robert Peel, famously repealed the Corn Laws. This caused a split in the Conservative party, as Disraeli accused Peel of betraying the party. The Peelites; Peel, Gladstone and Graham, split off. June 1849 saw the Willis Rooms meeting. This marked the foundation of the modern Liberals, with the Whig-Liberal alliance. It consisted of radical and liberal MPs, and Peelites. In 1852 and 1854 Lord John Russell attempted to introduce a new reform bill into parliament, under the premiership of Aberdeen, a Whig. ...read more.

Middle

Disraeli himself seemed to make it clear to Derby in 1866 that his main aim was to outmanoeuvre the Liberals; 'We are entirely unpledged upon the subject [of Parliamentary Reform]. But if no notice is taken of it in the Queen's Speech, or no subsequent announcement of measures is made by the Leader of the House of Commons, it is probable that an amendment of a general character may be carried, which will replace the question in the hands of the late Government, and they return to power not more embarrassed by the Radicals than before.' The historian M. Cowling believes strongly in the idea that the Reform Act was a the result of political rivalry; 'the action... was a battle within the political classes to sustain, support and achieve power.' There was a strong uncertainty about how the electorate would vote, and Derby described it as 'a leap in the dark', but the Conservatives, looking back over the last twenty years, may well have felt that they had little to lose. Derby explained that unless the Conservatives carry a Reform Bill, the Liberals would quickly be re-elected and would pass one themselves, saying that he: '...did not intend for a third time to be a mere stop-gap until it should suit the convenience of the Liberal party to forget their dissensions and bring forward a measure which should oust us from office and replace them there...' ...read more.

Conclusion

B. Smith describes: 'The Queen had a clearer sense than her Ministers of the strength of popular feeling and the necessity to maintain social harmony. Her agency gave the agitations a much greater influence in the counsels of the Tory Government than they would otherwise have possessed.' Therefore it is probably correct to say that personal and party advantages were the motivating forces behind the passing of 1867 Reform Act, although the public pressure should not be totally discounted. It is useful to look at an opinion such as that of the historian P. Smith: 'Derby and Disraeli and their followers, in 1867, did not determine to trust the people, or to put their faith in a Conservative democracy. They did what they felt they had to do, to satisfy the popular agitation, reconcile the upper strata of the working classes to the established political system, and 'dish the Whigs''. In this way we can take the view that although the Reform Act was probably a party political decision, and also a chance for Disraeli to improve his position in the Conservative party, it was also perhaps slightly down to the public pressure. Personal and party advantages were certainly the strongest forces being the passing of the 1867 Reform Act, but not the only ones. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    Peel would have been more likely to concede to respectable, structured middle class organisation. The Chartists were, however, less united and organisations. There were a number of divisions within the movement, even at leadership level. Furthermore, the National Convention held in London in February 1839 broke down because of internal divisions over tactics, and the way forward.

  2. What, other than the personal beliefs of Margaret Thatcher was there to Thatcherism?

    because her leadership style was largely a function of her personality and because that style represented a departure from previous modes of control. Initially there was some continuity in party discipline as the Conservative Party tried to avoid internal splits, but even this central trait of Conservative leadership and discipline

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    Thought this bill didn't face much opposition in the House of Commons Peel didn't really fight Wellington and Wharncliffe when they change the age of exclusion from 13 to 10 years old. This yet again show his lack of support to his own party as he once again join force

  2. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    It is clear to see from this evidence why so many members of the party felt betrayed by Peel's apparently sudden u-turn on the issue of repeal, Bentick's reaction clearly reflected the protectionist feeling of betrayal, describing Peel and his accomplices as 'no better than common cheats....

  1. The Kansas-Nebraska act led to the collapse of the Whig Party and the rise ...

    The successes of the 'Know Nothings' diverted attention away from the Whig Party their lack of supporters made its downfall inevitable. In 1856, an event called 'Bleeding Sumner' occurred. Charles Sumner delivered 2 speeches on 'The crime against Kansas' showing personal abuse to the Senator of South Carolina, Andrew Butler.

  2. Electoral Reform

    Majoritarian systems under represent smaller parties particularly the Liberal Democrats who are discriminated against under the FPTP system. The votes to seats correlation is extremely distorted favouring Labour and the Conservatives. Others would argue that if PR was used and there was a strong correlation between votes and seats a majority government would never be formed.

  1. The personal life of a political leader should be a concern for voters

    The background in politics that a politician has, should be displayed to voters because their education and knowledge insinuates their ability to run the nation. Without knowing, how can we vote?

  2. Evaluate the development of democracy in Britain from 1867 to the out break of ...

    It also distributed Parliamentary seats more equally throughout Britain by given fifteen seats to towns which had not had parliamentary representation until this time, it also gave an extra seat to some of the larger towns and cities, such as, Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds and Birmingham.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work