• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Poverty in early 20th century Britain

Extracts from this document...


Poverty in early 20th century Britain In the late 1800's and early 1900's the major cities of Britain were growing at an enormous rate. London almost doubled in size as people came in search of employment but soon found there were very few jobs available. The majority of the poor people moved into the city centres however there were very few houses available and many ending up sleeping on the streets. The upper and middle classes became very scared of the poor because of disease and fear of rebellion so one by one they all began to leave the city centers to live on the outskirts, in the suburbs. It had quickly become a downward spiral for the poor and action had to be taken by the British government for many reasons, this came in welfare reforms. An historian once said "The liberals introduced welfare reforms because they felt it was a moral duty to the poor". I am going to argue that this statement is not true and the government had other more important motives to help the poor than just moral reasons. ...read more.


They believed that the poor worked in an underground network and were organized in a military style system. The middle classes and government became terrified of this make believe network and felt they had to appease the poor. Disease was also a scary prospect for the rich to deal with. There was no sewer system in London and as if by overnight disease could spread from borough to borough. The government knew that if they improved conditions for the poor they could lower the spread of disease drastically. There are two very famous investigations that were carried out in the poverty stricken inner cities these were by Rowntrees and Boothe. Both these investigators wrote hefty books about the conditions that these people were living in and why. As well as this they both came to the conclusion that the poor were not to blame for the lousy conditions in which they lived. This surprised a number of politicians who had previously believed it was the poor's laziness and incompetence that led to their social position. The government was forced to rethink its view on the poor and was finally being persuaded into making a change. ...read more.


Labour was a party for the people and by the people and was quickly becoming a threat to big to ignore for the liberal government. The Liberals knew that if they paid more attention to the working class they could possibly gain some votes back. If they didn't do this there was a strong possibility they would be voted out of government. Two politicians who knew this as much as anybody was Winston Churchill and David Lloyd George. They recognized all of these concerns and pressured their party into making crucial changes. After weighing up all the evidence you can clearly see that the overwhelming economic pressure and hysterical fear of the poor were mostly the reason the government bought in welfare reforms. However this is not to say that there were no moral reasons involved. At the time the government made these descions they were very crucial because previously they had not got involved in the day to day running of peoples lives so much. This was called a laissz-faire government. Members of the government though now said it was ok to intervene in peoples lives if it was for the good of the economy and their well being. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    In fact the British sent the Portuguese, as the English were busy on their Egyptian campaign. However mistrusting the Portuguese, Captain Ball arrived in Malta with his fleet. In Gozo, the same thing happened as the Gozitans rose against the French.

  2. Free essay

    Why has Britain changed in the 20th century?

    to keep as big an empire due to risk of being attacked, it needed to take up allies in Europe. As well as this, when it seemed that Britain could potentially lose both wars, they needed to get help from the USA, that, I believe, is now why the ties between the countries are so tight.

  1. Tips for politicians

    If instead of talking about a youth center you speak about a new subcommittee you waste an excellent idea. Successful politicians do not talk about instruments. They talk about the results or even better the profit of their activities for the voters. Rule 9: Do not lose touch with reality.

  2. Why did Britain have no '1848 revolution'?

    As Homiz states 'inertia and apathy would continue to work for a long time in favour of established institutions and against those who sought to mount a popular challenge to them'7. Chartist aims were exclusively political and, despite becoming increasingly politicised, the working class was not committed like the middle classes.

  1. Tiananmen Square

    A limitation of the source is the fact that it doesn't tell us about what happened around Tiananmen Square. It only briefly describes what happened inside the square.

  2. Why were the Conservatives more successful than the Liberals in maintaining themselves in power ...

    the Conservative Central Office had six men and a few female clerks in 1911, but by the 1929 election, the total number employed was 296. The Junior Imperial League was set up in 1906, and by 1930 there were branches operating in 473 out of 507 constituencies.

  1. Which features of Russian society were likely to cause problems for the Tsarist government ...

    owners of land or factories) would then end up exploiting all the other groups in that society. As one class grew in dominance it would establish religious, social and cultural organisations to maintain its power. But, Marx claimed that this power structure never lasted and that it would eventually collapse.

  2. Why did the Liberals concentrate on poverty? 1906-11.

    The success of the schemes that were set up raised the possibilities of similar ideas being practiced on a national scale. There are four other main factors that attributed to the development of New Liberalism. Firstly, the report by Rowntree and Booth made many Liberals question their traditional values (believing in a policy of Laissez-Faire and 'Classical Liberalism')

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work