• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Privatisation was the subject of fierce party conflict in the 1980's and early 1990's, but since the mid 1990's there has been a growing consensus over the issue. Explain and evaluate this statement

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Privatisation was the subject of fierce party conflict in the 1980's and early 1990's, but since the mid 1990's there has been a growing consensus over the issue. Explain and evaluate this statement? Privatisation is the transfer of state-owned or nationalised industries to the private sector and Margaret Thatcher was the first to do this on a large scale in the late 1970's and early 80's. The Conservative Party felt that privatisation was the way forward and would help in their aim for a free market economy. They believed that privatisation would make industries more efficient by increasing the need for survival and profit. Privatisation also fitted in with Margaret Thatcher's view of a 'share owning democracy'. She wanted the ordinary people to be shareowners, as this would root capitalism into the countries roots. This aim was achieved, as by 1992 there were 10 million shareholders within the UK. The Tories wanted to save money and saw privatisation as an easy way to make money. This would help finance tax cuts and reduce the government borrowing. Also, as a by-product it would cut government spending as the government wouldn't have to give subsides to nationalised industries. To begin with the Tories began to privatise the companies, which had been nationalised by the 1974-1979 Labour government. This included aerospace (privatised in 1981-85 for �827 million) ...read more.

Middle

The electorate also became angry with the government for selling off public companies for very little money like Rail Track as this was sold for only �1.95 billion. All the privatisation led to huge unemployment figures as the privatised companies sought profit. BT alone lost 108,000 jobs between 1990 and 1991. The Tories believed in privatisation and thought it would increase efficiency, which it proved with the Jaguar Company as it was now making a �10 million profit and not a �121 million loss as it had previously but saw that there were inefficiencies with the system. They still support privatisation and are currently tackling new areas that have previously been taboo areas. These include the new 'schools passport' and the idea of Private-Public health care a new Private Public Partnership (PPP). During this period Labour was suffering from numerous embarrassing electoral defeats due partly to their position on privatisation. Labour was underpinned by socialism and this was characterised by common ownership seen in clause 4. This suggested harnessing material resources for the common good. Labour was hostile to privatisation as it believed that the Tories had no right to sell off what was collectively owned by the people. Former Conservative Prime Minister Lord Macmillan likened it to selling off the family silver. They said you could not sell what the society owned and that the people should not be exploited by ruthless businessmen. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, even if Labour did want to renationalise the cost of doing so would be colossal and electorally unpopular. During the 1980's and the early 1990's Labour did not agree with the Conservative enthusiasm for privatisation. They believed in their socialist views and thought that privatisation was selling off what people already owned. The Conservatives on the other hand believed privatisation was a brilliant idea, which would improve the efficiency of the companies so they could provide a better service for the public. There are elements of truth in both ideas but the electorate believe in privatisation, as it tends to produce efficient companies such as BT and Jaguar. The problem with some of these companies is that they don't work as a private company as directors are more concerned with making profits and so the quality of the service decreases. This can be seen with Rail Track which has since come out of administration and a new not-for-profit company, Network Rail, has had to take over the running of the railways. Now since New Labour has evolved there is a consensus between them and the Conservatives over privatisation. Both believed in the free market and have moved away from a Keynesian approach to the economy. Labour are now privatising companies and industries that were left by the conservatives such as hospitals and the London Underground but are doing so using PPP's and Private Finance Initiatives (PFI's) rather than the traditional Tory way of public procurement deals. Danielle Hill 13KF ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    Indeed he stated flattely, the Indian government had firmly opposed to it. Recalling that it was the Indian government itself that had appealed for security Council intervention In January 1948.Dixit said that had New Delhi delayed its appeal at

  2. Why Did the Post-war Consensus Breakdown?

    By pointing to the mistakes made in the past, the Thatcher governments were able to present their policies as fresh and necessary, The Thatcherite view of the 1970s, therefore, highlights themes that set the agenda in the 1980's. The first of these themes was that the management of the economy

  1. To what extent was there a 'post war consensus' between 1945-1970.

    The economic policies of Hugh Gaitskill, Labour chancellor 1950-1951, and R. A. Butler, Conservative Chancellor of the Exchequer 1951-1955, were so similar that they were given the name 'Butskellism', and this confirms that there was a strong consensus on economic policy during this period.

  2. J. S. Mill Despre Libertate

    Elasticitatile cererii si ofertei a celor doua tarii sunt susceptibile sa exercite o influenta asupra raporturilor de schimb e. Luarea �n consideratie a preturilor de transport modifica concluziile precedente Mill sustine ca introducerea mai multor marfuri sau tari nu ar modifica concluziile precedente.

  1. Is New Labour a Conservative Party?

    Unions were regulated and employment protection minimized to give firms this flexibility. But it made employment insecure and created inequality and poverty, (courseworkbank.co.uk). When John Major succeeded Thatcher after a leadership contest when the party lost confidence in Thatcher's leadership in November 1990, many thought Major would be the best

  2. With reference to any material you have studied explain the approach of the Democratic ...

    Although the DUP's bargaining position was fortified by its electoral success the DUP recognised that in the future it would have to negotiate and compromise in order to consolidate its position as the leading party in NI. Sinn Fein (SF)

  1. The Mexican Economy

    This revolt affects the current exchange rate due to the uncertainty surrounding this uprising. Many valuable resources can be found in the Chiapas region, such as timber, coffee and oil. Many foreign industries have reduced or canceled work in the region for fear of being caught between the EZLN and government troops.

  2. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    "Socialism developed as a critique and alternative to capitalism and its political expression, Conservatism" (Jones, 1998, p.97). Like Liberalism and Conservatism, socialism can be divided into two strands: reformist socialism (democratic socialism and social democracy) and revolutionary socialism (Marxism), which ideas differ from each other. Whereas revolutionary socialism (Marxism)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work