• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Proportional Representation

Extracts from this document...


What are the arguments for introducing proportional representation for Westminster elections? PR is a description of any electoral system which tends to produce institutions of the people who have elected them. There are currently many arguments for the change in the electoral system, it would give voters more choices, it is seen as a fairer system compared to FPTP and of course it would make every vote count unlike FPTP. However, the current Westminster election system of the FPTP system has successfully been delivering governments for over 60 years now, it also delivers strong, single party governments and it allows the people to receive a government that has clear policies that it will deliver due to the party's electoral manifesto. The introduction of PR in Westminster elections would give voters more choices. ...read more.


If the same amount of votes were received under PR, the seat difference would be much closer and therefore could have led to a coalition government, it also brings in the argument to give other parties such as the Liberal Democrats a better chance of gaining more seats. On the other hand, there are many arguments against reform too. The Westminster elections have been using the simple plurality system for over 60 years now and the argument of 'if it is not broken don't try to fix it' comes in to play. The argument is that this system is currently working well and most voters understand the system well too, bringing in a totally new system could possibly confuse voters and therefore the government would rather be safe than sorry and continue to use a system that is working well. ...read more.


As the FPTP ensures a strong government, the people will get the policies they voted for. However, under PR, where a coalition government is likely, conflict of ideas will also be likely making it harder to pass legislature, therefore it will probably mark the end of the manifesto system and therefore it will make voters unsure of what they are exactly voting for. There are good arguments for and against of an electoral reform and although the PR system offers the chance to make every vote count, the FPTP system has been working very well for such a long period now that it would be undesirable to change it now. The FPTP system ensures we get a government, and that is the most important part of an electoral system and it is currently ensuring that we do get a government, so it is fit for purpose and therefore it would be better if this system was not abandoned. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "Parliament now legitimates rather than legislates." With reference to the role and functions of ...

    A principle, but by no way exclusive, source of policy is the majority party's election manifesto. Winning parties have a very good record in implementing their manifestos. Each party has a different way in formulating the policies in the manifesto.

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    The rational for this system is that it reduces the disparity between a party's share of the national vote and number of seats in parliament. For example, in a plurality-majoritarian system, a party's candidates could theoretically win 51 percent of the votes in each regional election, resulting in that party

  1. Would a Proportional Representation system produce a more representative and effective Government?

    However experience has shown us that PR systems often put crucial decisions in the hands of very small minoritie, possible extremist". Furthermore, it can be argued that the current elcoral system should be preserved as one critic cited "there was no surging agitation" for a change.

  2. Political parties and representation

    the sovereign... cannot be represented by anyone but itself." Direct democracy was assumed to exist in classical Athens, where all citizens (though that excluded women, aliens and slaves) could vote in general assembly. Direct democracy survives in some Swiss communes, and in the principle of referendums (see below): one sometimes encounters the suggestion also of 'electronic direct democracy' in future.

  1. The Plurality System.

    Also in 1974 where labour won 301 seats with 37.2% of the vote when the conservative party won 297 seats with 37.9% of the vote. Although the system produces a single winning party, the party rarely wins an outright majority.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    while delivery was to be in the hands of independent executive agencies. Each Executive Agency is headed by a Chief Executive with considerable flexibility to determine the structure and operation of the Agency and the pay, grading and recruitment of personnel.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work