• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Proportional Representation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the arguments for introducing proportional representation for Westminster elections? PR is a description of any electoral system which tends to produce institutions of the people who have elected them. There are currently many arguments for the change in the electoral system, it would give voters more choices, it is seen as a fairer system compared to FPTP and of course it would make every vote count unlike FPTP. However, the current Westminster election system of the FPTP system has successfully been delivering governments for over 60 years now, it also delivers strong, single party governments and it allows the people to receive a government that has clear policies that it will deliver due to the party's electoral manifesto. The introduction of PR in Westminster elections would give voters more choices. ...read more.

Middle

If the same amount of votes were received under PR, the seat difference would be much closer and therefore could have led to a coalition government, it also brings in the argument to give other parties such as the Liberal Democrats a better chance of gaining more seats. On the other hand, there are many arguments against reform too. The Westminster elections have been using the simple plurality system for over 60 years now and the argument of 'if it is not broken don't try to fix it' comes in to play. The argument is that this system is currently working well and most voters understand the system well too, bringing in a totally new system could possibly confuse voters and therefore the government would rather be safe than sorry and continue to use a system that is working well. ...read more.

Conclusion

As the FPTP ensures a strong government, the people will get the policies they voted for. However, under PR, where a coalition government is likely, conflict of ideas will also be likely making it harder to pass legislature, therefore it will probably mark the end of the manifesto system and therefore it will make voters unsure of what they are exactly voting for. There are good arguments for and against of an electoral reform and although the PR system offers the chance to make every vote count, the FPTP system has been working very well for such a long period now that it would be undesirable to change it now. The FPTP system ensures we get a government, and that is the most important part of an electoral system and it is currently ensuring that we do get a government, so it is fit for purpose and therefore it would be better if this system was not abandoned. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "Parliament now legitimates rather than legislates." With reference to the role and functions of ...

    A principle, but by no way exclusive, source of policy is the majority party's election manifesto. Winning parties have a very good record in implementing their manifestos. Each party has a different way in formulating the policies in the manifesto.

  2. Political parties and representation

    What are the reasons for political representation? Representation is nowadays normally assumed to be essential for democracy. However, some would insist that direct democracy is the only 'true' form of democracy (all citizens vote on all issues). Thus Rousseau, The Social Contract: "Sovereignty, being nothing other than the general will, can never be alienated...

  1. The Plurality System.

    Extra votes adding on to the winning parties majority give no benefit to them. It will not gain them any more seats in parliament. This was illustrated in the 1997 election where the Lib Dem's won 16.7% of the vote but only 7% of the seats.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    while delivery was to be in the hands of independent executive agencies. Each Executive Agency is headed by a Chief Executive with considerable flexibility to determine the structure and operation of the Agency and the pay, grading and recruitment of personnel.

  1. Would a Proportional Representation system produce a more representative and effective Government?

    In the past FPTP has lead to strong governments as result of the clear mandate and are therefore legitimate and can take radical decisions. As George Foulkes pointed out, "our present voting system at least ensures that government descisions are made by the party which has the most votes.

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    The representatives are therefore more likely to be oriented toward constituent service. Proportional Representation (PR) The most popular variant of this system is the "list" method, where parties devise a list of electoral candidates ranked in order. Elections are then held on either a national or regional basis with people

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work