• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Proportional Representation is when electoral systems seek to apportion seats to political parties in near proportion to votes won.

Extracts from this document...


Proportional Representation is when electoral systems seek to apportion seats to political parties in near proportion to votes won. Proportional representation gives voters little say in the shape of a future government, since political parties are usually reluctant to talk about the possible structure of a coalition prior to Election Day. And because all coalition members are as eager to take the praise for government success as they are to blame other coalition members when things go wrong, it's difficult for voters to ascertain which party has done well and which ones haven't. It can be a destabilising fragmentation of the party system. PR reflects and facilitates a fragmentation of the party system. It is possible that such polarized pluralism can allow tiny minority parties to hold larger parties to ransom in coalition negotiations. In this respect, the inclusiveness of PR is cited as a drawback of the system. ...read more.


It generally demands more knowledge of party beliefs/manifestos etc and greater activity of the voters (for example, to rank candidates in order of preference such as in the single transferable vote system), and hence may discourage participation. The procedure may simply prove to be too complex for many voters. In a list system electors choose from a list of candidates in large multi-member constituencies. Seats are allocated according to the proportion of votes won by each political party. In open list systems, voters select from a list of individual candidates representing political parties and independent candidates without a party affiliation. In closed list systems, electors can only vote for a party slate or for an advantage or for an independent candidate. As a result of proportional representation list systems do suffer from these disadvantages. A candidate's position on the party list, and therefore likelihood of success, is dependent on currying favor with party bosses, whose relationship with the electorate is of secondary importance. ...read more.


In the regional or national list systems, party leaders may draw up lists of only like-minded candidates which may disadvantage minority groups within a party. Although there is a larger than average number of women in the Scottish Parliament, there are few representatives from other groups such as ethnic minorities or the disabled. This is not desirable for an effective democracy. However there are some advantages of the list systems. The strength of such of the system guarantees a high degree of proportionality. If a party receives 32% of the vote, they will get 32% of the seats in parliament. Every vote has the same value. Also the system is very simple for voters, who have only to make one choice for a party out of a small section. Proportional representation voting systems facilitate the election of legislatures that accurately reflect the diversity of opinion of the electorate and tend to produce policy that adheres more closely to the "will of the majority" because more people have representation. Nevertheless at the same time, governance can be more complicated and geographic representation less certain than with winner-take-all elections. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    'First-past-the-post should be replaced as a method of electing political representatives.' Discuss.

    5 star(s)

    Although this system has some positive characteristics, it also has a few downsides to it. The main criticism of FPTP is that the number of votes cast for a party in general elections is not accurately reflected in the number of seats won.

  2. Peer reviewed

    What have been the effects of the use of proportional electoral systems in the ...

    3 star(s)

    that results are broadly proportional and votes are much less likely to be wasted. Single member constituencies are still used and thus MPs are more closely linked to a particular geographical region. Voters also have two votes, one of which can be used to support a particular candidate, the other to support a specific political party.

  1. Is the Media an independent political actor?

    dominant assumptions of our society."21 A study by Cardiff University concludes that "The BBC displayed the most pro-war agenda of any British broadcaster"22 during the Iraq War and its allocation of just 2% of foreign affairs coverage to opposition views (views that arguably represented the majority of British public)

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Yet the number of electors per constituency varies dramatically cross-nationally: for example India has 545 representatives for a population of 898 million, so each member of the Lok Sabha serves about 1.6 million people, while in contrast Ireland has 166 members in the D�il Eireann for a population of 3.5 million, or one seat per 21,000 people.

  1. Would a Proportional Representation system produce a more representative and effective Government?

    In the past FPTP has lead to strong governments as result of the clear mandate and are therefore legitimate and can take radical decisions. As George Foulkes pointed out, "our present voting system at least ensures that government descisions are made by the party which has the most votes.

  2. Proportional Representation

    Any alternative system to FPTP would produce a result which was more accurately representative of the votes made. The current system has heavily been criticised for not being proportional and therefore being unfair towards some parties. For example in the 2005 election the Conservatives received about 800,000 votes less than the Labour Party however the difference in seats was 158.

  1. Proportional Representation

    An additional-member vacancy may be filled by the next available candidate on the relevant party list.Also, the London Assembly is elected by the Additional Member System. There are fourteen directly elected constituencies, nine of which were won by the Conservatives and five by the Labour Party.

  2. Minority parties in Britain call for electoral reform whereas the two major parties tend ...

    This leads to another benefit in that voters are currently able to vote for a set of policies, but coalitions mean that the policies may not be made, or are subject to change. With neither party holly in control, the concept of a responsible government is also diminished.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work