• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Proportional Representation is when electoral systems seek to apportion seats to political parties in near proportion to votes won.

Extracts from this document...


Proportional Representation is when electoral systems seek to apportion seats to political parties in near proportion to votes won. Proportional representation gives voters little say in the shape of a future government, since political parties are usually reluctant to talk about the possible structure of a coalition prior to Election Day. And because all coalition members are as eager to take the praise for government success as they are to blame other coalition members when things go wrong, it's difficult for voters to ascertain which party has done well and which ones haven't. It can be a destabilising fragmentation of the party system. PR reflects and facilitates a fragmentation of the party system. It is possible that such polarized pluralism can allow tiny minority parties to hold larger parties to ransom in coalition negotiations. In this respect, the inclusiveness of PR is cited as a drawback of the system. ...read more.


It generally demands more knowledge of party beliefs/manifestos etc and greater activity of the voters (for example, to rank candidates in order of preference such as in the single transferable vote system), and hence may discourage participation. The procedure may simply prove to be too complex for many voters. In a list system electors choose from a list of candidates in large multi-member constituencies. Seats are allocated according to the proportion of votes won by each political party. In open list systems, voters select from a list of individual candidates representing political parties and independent candidates without a party affiliation. In closed list systems, electors can only vote for a party slate or for an advantage or for an independent candidate. As a result of proportional representation list systems do suffer from these disadvantages. A candidate's position on the party list, and therefore likelihood of success, is dependent on currying favor with party bosses, whose relationship with the electorate is of secondary importance. ...read more.


In the regional or national list systems, party leaders may draw up lists of only like-minded candidates which may disadvantage minority groups within a party. Although there is a larger than average number of women in the Scottish Parliament, there are few representatives from other groups such as ethnic minorities or the disabled. This is not desirable for an effective democracy. However there are some advantages of the list systems. The strength of such of the system guarantees a high degree of proportionality. If a party receives 32% of the vote, they will get 32% of the seats in parliament. Every vote has the same value. Also the system is very simple for voters, who have only to make one choice for a party out of a small section. Proportional representation voting systems facilitate the election of legislatures that accurately reflect the diversity of opinion of the electorate and tend to produce policy that adheres more closely to the "will of the majority" because more people have representation. Nevertheless at the same time, governance can be more complicated and geographic representation less certain than with winner-take-all elections. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    'First-past-the-post should be replaced as a method of electing political representatives.' Discuss.

    5 star(s)

    Although this system has some positive characteristics, it also has a few downsides to it. The main criticism of FPTP is that the number of votes cast for a party in general elections is not accurately reflected in the number of seats won.

  2. Peer reviewed

    What have been the effects of the use of proportional electoral systems in the ...

    3 star(s)

    that results are broadly proportional and votes are much less likely to be wasted. Single member constituencies are still used and thus MPs are more closely linked to a particular geographical region. Voters also have two votes, one of which can be used to support a particular candidate, the other to support a specific political party.

  1. Minority parties in Britain call for electoral reform whereas the two major parties tend ...

    The FPTP system also prevents extremist minority parties from gaining any seats in Parliament. While this may appear to defeat the idea of giving the voter a choice, it is generally accepted that parties such as the National Front should not have any power in the House of Commons.

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    One feature of this system is that single-member constituencies are based on the size of the electorate. The United States is divided into 435 Congressional districts each including roughly equal populations with one House representative per district. Boundaries are reviewed at periodic intervals, based on the census, to equalise the electorate.

  1. "Critically evaluate the relationship between Members of Parliament, political parties and pressure groups in ...

    Though attempts at private bills are not necessarily in the interest of the public and just views that the M.P in question feels particularly strongly about. I do not think that this is a particularly wise idea as they would have to much influence in making laws that they want.

  2. Would a Proportional Representation system produce a more representative and effective Government?

    In the past FPTP has lead to strong governments as result of the clear mandate and are therefore legitimate and can take radical decisions. As George Foulkes pointed out, "our present voting system at least ensures that government descisions are made by the party which has the most votes.

  1. Russia - political past, present and future

    One of the strong opposition parties to the current Russian government is the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF). Lead by Gennadii Ziuganov, it is the only real European-style party in Russia, with a membership base and extensive national organization.

  2. What are the main functions of political parties? How effectively do political parties fulfil ...

    Representation is not as wide as it could be because of this, the fact that Parliament is still predominantly middle-aged, white and male is also a concern for those who advocate a more demographic legislative and executive. The Policy Function is the idea that parties formulate policies and help refine those formulated by the Government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work