• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Proportional Representation is when electoral systems seek to apportion seats to political parties in near proportion to votes won.

Extracts from this document...


Proportional Representation is when electoral systems seek to apportion seats to political parties in near proportion to votes won. Proportional representation gives voters little say in the shape of a future government, since political parties are usually reluctant to talk about the possible structure of a coalition prior to Election Day. And because all coalition members are as eager to take the praise for government success as they are to blame other coalition members when things go wrong, it's difficult for voters to ascertain which party has done well and which ones haven't. It can be a destabilising fragmentation of the party system. PR reflects and facilitates a fragmentation of the party system. It is possible that such polarized pluralism can allow tiny minority parties to hold larger parties to ransom in coalition negotiations. In this respect, the inclusiveness of PR is cited as a drawback of the system. ...read more.


It generally demands more knowledge of party beliefs/manifestos etc and greater activity of the voters (for example, to rank candidates in order of preference such as in the single transferable vote system), and hence may discourage participation. The procedure may simply prove to be too complex for many voters. In a list system electors choose from a list of candidates in large multi-member constituencies. Seats are allocated according to the proportion of votes won by each political party. In open list systems, voters select from a list of individual candidates representing political parties and independent candidates without a party affiliation. In closed list systems, electors can only vote for a party slate or for an advantage or for an independent candidate. As a result of proportional representation list systems do suffer from these disadvantages. A candidate's position on the party list, and therefore likelihood of success, is dependent on currying favor with party bosses, whose relationship with the electorate is of secondary importance. ...read more.


In the regional or national list systems, party leaders may draw up lists of only like-minded candidates which may disadvantage minority groups within a party. Although there is a larger than average number of women in the Scottish Parliament, there are few representatives from other groups such as ethnic minorities or the disabled. This is not desirable for an effective democracy. However there are some advantages of the list systems. The strength of such of the system guarantees a high degree of proportionality. If a party receives 32% of the vote, they will get 32% of the seats in parliament. Every vote has the same value. Also the system is very simple for voters, who have only to make one choice for a party out of a small section. Proportional representation voting systems facilitate the election of legislatures that accurately reflect the diversity of opinion of the electorate and tend to produce policy that adheres more closely to the "will of the majority" because more people have representation. Nevertheless at the same time, governance can be more complicated and geographic representation less certain than with winner-take-all elections. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    'First-past-the-post should be replaced as a method of electing political representatives.' Discuss.

    5 star(s)

    Although this system has some positive characteristics, it also has a few downsides to it. The main criticism of FPTP is that the number of votes cast for a party in general elections is not accurately reflected in the number of seats won.

  2. Peer reviewed

    What have been the effects of the use of proportional electoral systems in the ...

    3 star(s)

    On the other hand, there are also several negative effects of the system. The main undemocratic feature of the closed list system is that the parties have full control over the MPs selected based on party list votes- the voter has no input on which candidate should be selected as an additional member.

  1. Minority parties in Britain call for electoral reform whereas the two major parties tend ...

    The FPTP system also prevents extremist minority parties from gaining any seats in Parliament. While this may appear to defeat the idea of giving the voter a choice, it is generally accepted that parties such as the National Front should not have any power in the House of Commons.

  2. What is the role of political parties in a democratic political community?

    Another role of the political party is to be accountable for one's actions while in office. If the party that forms the government has done something wrong during its term in office, they will be held accountable for this. Political parties are essential in the development and organising of public policy.

  1. Proportional Representation

    FPTP also delivers strong, single party governments with good working majorities. This means that we are ensured a long lasting government rather than having a weak coalition. In other EU countries such as Italy and Belgium, under the PR, there have been many coalitions that have not lasted very long, therefore have quite a political impact on the state.

  2. Proportional Representation

    An additional-member vacancy may be filled by the next available candidate on the relevant party list.Also, the London Assembly is elected by the Additional Member System. There are fourteen directly elected constituencies, nine of which were won by the Conservatives and five by the Labour Party.

  1. "Critically evaluate the relationship between Members of Parliament, political parties and pressure groups in ...

    Though attempts at private bills are not necessarily in the interest of the public and just views that the M.P in question feels particularly strongly about. I do not think that this is a particularly wise idea as they would have to much influence in making laws that they want.

  2. Is the Media an independent political actor?

    the government whilst at the same time maintain audience retention is what Blumler and Gurevitch call "a crisis of civic communication."15 There is a deep-rooted consensus in Britain that the BBC acts as an impartial newscaster, neutral and independent of state control and it is described in Politics UK as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work