• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Question 2: Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and -Gettes were

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Question 2: Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and -Gettes were different: The two parties both fighting for women's rights and independence were the Suffragists and the Suffragettes. The methods used by the two vary greatly. This is due to a number of factors, some of which not as important as others. The most obvious difference of the two parties was the styles of leadership. The Suffragettes were led by Mrs Emmeline Pankhurst was a great supporter of the use of aggressive means to gain her rights. In direct comparison to Millicent Garrett of the NUWSS (Suffragists), the difference is quite obvious. ...read more.

Middle

The WSPU also produced clever posters, broke windows, set fire to post boxes and fought the police when they were arrested. The NUWSS cause no such trouble throughout the war for the vote. The women's political representation was through no party, as no party would fully support either group. Although there were individuals within the political parties the parties in their entirety who would claim to support women, the right to vote was not popular enough to be suggested by any. The Prime Minister did not want to back down to the attacks of violence from the Suffragettes, possibly implying that the Suffragists methods were more constructive in the fight. The WSPU were not successful during any campaign of violence. ...read more.

Conclusion

They allowed the Government access to their funds and set up many organisations such as the VADs (Voluntary Aid Detachment). The women proved their worth by working long hours in such forces as the WAACs (Women's Auxiliary Army Corps). This is more than likely to have influenced the Governments decision to relent and give the vote after the war. The methods of action for the Suffragists and -Gettes varied greatly during their campaigns, but often crossed each others boundaries. The result they wanted was the same, but they were coming in a pincer movement, from opposite sides, to get the Government to give them what they wanted. The war effort made by the NUWSS was one of the major influences on the British Government, but it was by no means the only one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Sharpeville Massacre Sources Question

    * You could be forced to live in a certain place. * You were barred from public places such as churches or cinemas. * You could be kept under house arrest. * You could not be quoted in newspapers. * The police constantly watched you.

  2. The Suffragettes Project

    For the next seven years she was imprisoned repeatedly. Now in her fifties, Emmeline's actions inspired many other women to follow her example of committing acts of civil disobedience. In one eighteen month period, she endured ten hunger-strikes.

  1. Indian Independence Coursework.

    The idea of partitioning India was a really late development and there had been some hope of an undivided India, with a government consisting of three tiers along basically the same lines as the borders of India and Pakistan at the time of Partition.

  2. Chartist aims and methods - Source related study.

    Thus they wanted a much more cautious, rational approach. Source B agrees with this peaceful reasoning, as it was written by Lovett himself. It shows us that the leaders disagreed on the issue of violence or non-violence. Lovett thinks that violence is 'harmful and damages the movement' and that if O'Connor was allowed to act on his preaching, then it would 'lead to the destruction of Chartism.'

  1. HUMANITIES COURSEWORK

    Even though a wall was built between, people were still felt uneasy and show how they prejudiced and stereotyped people in their daily lives. Palestinians in Israel were all over the place. The majority of people were Jewish and minority were Palestinians.

  2. Aims and Methods Used by the Suffragists

    The Liberal Party won the 1905 General Election. The NUWSS believed that women would now be granted equal rights with men. However, this did not happen and although Millicent Fawcett had always been a Liberal, she became increasing angry at the party's unwillingness to give full support to women's suffrage.

  1. The Suffragettes & The Suffragists.

    The march did not end peacefully, unlike the NUWSS had intended as the Suffragist societies did not want to adopt suffragette style tactics. These were things such as setting fire to pillar boxes, throwing stones at government buildings or homes of MPs, or even martyrdom.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different.

    Other peaceful methods adopted by the NUWSS included petitions, propaganda campaigns (posters, banners, postcards, newsletters, plays and theatre productions produced by women nation-wide) and peaceful public demonstrations Although effective, the suffragist's methods were slow, and often still ignored by major politicians and authorities.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work