• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Question 2: Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and -Gettes were

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Question 2: Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and -Gettes were different: The two parties both fighting for women's rights and independence were the Suffragists and the Suffragettes. The methods used by the two vary greatly. This is due to a number of factors, some of which not as important as others. The most obvious difference of the two parties was the styles of leadership. The Suffragettes were led by Mrs Emmeline Pankhurst was a great supporter of the use of aggressive means to gain her rights. In direct comparison to Millicent Garrett of the NUWSS (Suffragists), the difference is quite obvious. ...read more.

Middle

The WSPU also produced clever posters, broke windows, set fire to post boxes and fought the police when they were arrested. The NUWSS cause no such trouble throughout the war for the vote. The women's political representation was through no party, as no party would fully support either group. Although there were individuals within the political parties the parties in their entirety who would claim to support women, the right to vote was not popular enough to be suggested by any. The Prime Minister did not want to back down to the attacks of violence from the Suffragettes, possibly implying that the Suffragists methods were more constructive in the fight. The WSPU were not successful during any campaign of violence. ...read more.

Conclusion

They allowed the Government access to their funds and set up many organisations such as the VADs (Voluntary Aid Detachment). The women proved their worth by working long hours in such forces as the WAACs (Women's Auxiliary Army Corps). This is more than likely to have influenced the Governments decision to relent and give the vote after the war. The methods of action for the Suffragists and -Gettes varied greatly during their campaigns, but often crossed each others boundaries. The result they wanted was the same, but they were coming in a pincer movement, from opposite sides, to get the Government to give them what they wanted. The war effort made by the NUWSS was one of the major influences on the British Government, but it was by no means the only one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Indian Independence Coursework.

    Source D is very useful as it is a statement from a member of the Labour government sent to India on a mission to make India independent. Source D shows us that after WW2 Britain could no longer keep control of a large country like India as it was fought

  2. The Suffragettes & The Suffragists.

    None off these had been successful in gaining any leeway, or changing the minds of top politicians. Some of these acts had even the previously supportive public turn on them. They continued to pressure the government with their actions, but Parliament only responded with force in return.

  1. Chartist aims and methods - Source related study.

    sword and the musket is unanswerable,' here totally rejecting any peaceful approach. All this language, shows Harney to be a demagogue and it may be that it was just empty rhetoric. Thus Sources B and C completely disagree about how chartist aims should be met.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different.

    Other peaceful methods adopted by the NUWSS included petitions, propaganda campaigns (posters, banners, postcards, newsletters, plays and theatre productions produced by women nation-wide) and peaceful public demonstrations Although effective, the suffragist's methods were slow, and often still ignored by major politicians and authorities.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    They committed such illegal activities such as Arson attacks. The main reason for doing arson attacks was a response to the window smashing attacks but more severe. These arson attacks mainly started in the year 1914. When at least four major acts of arson were committed.

  2. Aims and Methods Used by the Suffragists

    Herbert Asquith became Prime Minister in 1908. Unlike other leading members of the Liberal Party, Asquith was a strong opponent of votes for women. In 1912 Fawcett and the NUWSS took the decision to support Labour Party candidates in parliamentary elections.

  1. Sharpeville Massacre Sources Question

    Passbooks prevented the movement of unemployed black people into white areas. This meant that many black people lived out their entire lives in poverty - they had no job, but they could not get a job because either. Understandably, passbooks prompted much anger in the black community.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragettes and the Suffragists were ...

    added to the snowball effect caused by the continuous stream of complaint and protest. The WSPU on the other hand, famed for their arson campaign and assaulting of policemen, also used a variety of methods to be seen, and in the event vilified, by the general populous.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work