• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Question 2: Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and -Gettes were

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Question 2: Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and -Gettes were different: The two parties both fighting for women's rights and independence were the Suffragists and the Suffragettes. The methods used by the two vary greatly. This is due to a number of factors, some of which not as important as others. The most obvious difference of the two parties was the styles of leadership. The Suffragettes were led by Mrs Emmeline Pankhurst was a great supporter of the use of aggressive means to gain her rights. In direct comparison to Millicent Garrett of the NUWSS (Suffragists), the difference is quite obvious. ...read more.

Middle

The WSPU also produced clever posters, broke windows, set fire to post boxes and fought the police when they were arrested. The NUWSS cause no such trouble throughout the war for the vote. The women's political representation was through no party, as no party would fully support either group. Although there were individuals within the political parties the parties in their entirety who would claim to support women, the right to vote was not popular enough to be suggested by any. The Prime Minister did not want to back down to the attacks of violence from the Suffragettes, possibly implying that the Suffragists methods were more constructive in the fight. The WSPU were not successful during any campaign of violence. ...read more.

Conclusion

They allowed the Government access to their funds and set up many organisations such as the VADs (Voluntary Aid Detachment). The women proved their worth by working long hours in such forces as the WAACs (Women's Auxiliary Army Corps). This is more than likely to have influenced the Governments decision to relent and give the vote after the war. The methods of action for the Suffragists and -Gettes varied greatly during their campaigns, but often crossed each others boundaries. The result they wanted was the same, but they were coming in a pincer movement, from opposite sides, to get the Government to give them what they wanted. The war effort made by the NUWSS was one of the major influences on the British Government, but it was by no means the only one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Sharpeville Massacre Sources Question

    You were not allowed to be in the same with more than one person at any one time (unless they were close members of your family). In addition to this; * You were not allowed to associate with other banned people.

  2. The Suffragettes Project

    For the next seven years she was imprisoned repeatedly. Now in her fifties, Emmeline's actions inspired many other women to follow her example of committing acts of civil disobedience. In one eighteen month period, she endured ten hunger-strikes.

  1. Aims and Methods Used by the Suffragists

    Herbert Asquith became Prime Minister in 1908. Unlike other leading members of the Liberal Party, Asquith was a strong opponent of votes for women. In 1912 Fawcett and the NUWSS took the decision to support Labour Party candidates in parliamentary elections.

  2. Indian Independence Coursework.

    The idea of partitioning India was a really late development and there had been some hope of an undivided India, with a government consisting of three tiers along basically the same lines as the borders of India and Pakistan at the time of Partition.

  1. Chartist aims and methods - Source related study.

    Thus they wanted a much more cautious, rational approach. Source B agrees with this peaceful reasoning, as it was written by Lovett himself. It shows us that the leaders disagreed on the issue of violence or non-violence. Lovett thinks that violence is 'harmful and damages the movement' and that if O'Connor was allowed to act on his preaching, then it would 'lead to the destruction of Chartism.'

  2. HUMANITIES COURSEWORK

    Israel is in the Middle East which, which is an Islamic dominated area; this leads to the Jewish people feeling like a vulnerable ethnic group. Also, both Israel and Palestine have different religions: Judaism and Islam which play a major role in the politics of the area.

  1. The Suffragettes & The Suffragists.

    The march did not end peacefully, unlike the NUWSS had intended as the Suffragist societies did not want to adopt suffragette style tactics. These were things such as setting fire to pillar boxes, throwing stones at government buildings or homes of MPs, or even martyrdom.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different.

    Other peaceful methods adopted by the NUWSS included petitions, propaganda campaigns (posters, banners, postcards, newsletters, plays and theatre productions produced by women nation-wide) and peaceful public demonstrations Although effective, the suffragist's methods were slow, and often still ignored by major politicians and authorities.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work