• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Race Relations in the USA and South Africa since 1945 : How external pressure brought down Apartheid.

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework Assessment Objective 2: Analysis and Explaining the Past Race Relations in the USA and South Africa since 1945 The aim of this essay is to see how the opposition of other countries affected the end of apartheid in South Africa. I shall find this out using statements, books, encyclopedias and the Internet. These will then enable me to write a conclusion. I need to find out whether apartheid ended in South Africa by national or international events. Apartheid is the total segregation of the races. In this case South Africa took it as far as making the Black African citizens stay in their designated country. The White Afrikaans made every Blacks African have a passbook, which said which countries they could enter. The rulers of apartheid gave the Black Africans no political rights; this meant that they could not change the way the country was being run. The only way they could make themselves heard was to riot and protest. Another strange fact about apartheid was that the vast majority of the population was the Blacks, so this meant that the minority had come into their county and total changed society. The British and Dutch colonized South Africa in the seventeenth century. ...read more.


The United Nations soon imposed a trading boycott in 1962, this was to try and get the government to reverse the policy of Apartheid. This was the first step that the international countries took to try and make an end of Apartheid. However trading boycotts prove to be ineffective, this was because in the 1960s they found that South Africa had large amounts of Gold and Diamonds as natural recourses. After the Sharville massacre, investors started to withdraw their money from South Africa, this was because there was a fear of a civil war breaking out. The investors in the 1960s some how managed to pump money into South Africa even though there had been a trading boycott and economic sanctions. The money that was put into South Africa kept them a wealthy country. Economic Sanctions brought a higher standard of living and a better wage to Native Black citerzans, but still there were no political freedom. Foreign govements soon started to cut sporting links with South Africa in particular Rugby and Cricket, which were the most popular for the Whites. In 1968 an African-born cricketer called Basil D'Oliveria was a member of the British Cricket Team, when they were touring South Africa he was refused entry of one of the states. ...read more.


If they had their Buffer Zone they would have a protective wall that would surround their country. The whites of South Africa were becoming worried about the Blacks reclaiming there power and political rights, this meant that when the majority of Blacks were to vote they could then take over the government of South Africa. I think that the International boycotts helped the end of Apartheid, this is because it showed South Africa the anger of the world towards the way they treated the Blacks South Africans. The boycotts did not end Apartheid they were more of a gesture to show the Blacks that they had support in their actions against Apartheid. In conclusion and though sufficient evidence, I think that the importance of the International input to Apartheid had little affect on the end result. The affect that the international opposition had on Apartheid was just to say that they were behind the Blacks movements and to say to South Africa that what they were doing was wrong. The Blacks of South Africa did more to the end Apartheid because they actually held the protests that made the changes. The Blacks had managed to come from a life of poverty and an uneducated child life. So my interpretation of the Coursework question is that the international input was useful to the end of Apartheid but did very little to end it ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How important was the opposition of other countries in bringing apartheid in South Africa ...

    In 1973 Biko was banned as many young blacks caught onto Black Consciousness and it was becoming a threat to the white government. He was detained without a trial in 1976 for a few months and then again in 1977.

  2. The ending of white minority rule in South Africa was achieved only because of ...

    It had 83% of the world's platinum. Companies found ways around the laws against trade with South Africa - this meant that the sanctions were not as powerful as they could have been. Also, there was a political motivation - neither Thatcher nor Reagan agreed with apartheid but the fear

  1. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    I would like to draw attention to the term 'the churches'. Some analysts use the term 'the Church'.3 This may give the false impression that the churches are one organisation with one voice and belief. While this is what Jesus and St Paul may have wanted4, it is far from the truth in South Africa and Namibia.


    This really implies that Palestinian economy was falling because the Israelis were there guarding them, they had no right to come out and buy food. Also, Instead of food becoming a source of nutrition and funds for the Palestinians, the foods were just left rotting in the shops.

  1. In what ways were the lives of South Africans changed by the policy of ...

    Verwoerd made this law more racist by essentially excluding any non-White from being allowed to live in established towns or to live and work in any established economically viable areas all of which were proclaimed to be White areas. It caused many non-Whites to have to commute large distances from their homes in order to be able to work.

  2. American Iran Relations For years, relations between the U.S. and the Middle Eastern country ...

    should seek to foster change through diplomacy and trade. If U.S. officials fail to give up grudges against Iran, supporters argue, they will squander an opportunity to gain a new trading partner and potential ally. Yet others are less optimistic about Iran's prospects for change, and reject the notion that the country deserves of closer commercial and diplomatic ties.

  1. However before the 1950's the opposition for apartheid wasn't effective what so ever. This ...

    Although they had positive attitude as they didn't want to hurt any innocent people unlike the government's methods of shooting at helpless men and women. He planned his attacks very carefully, and made sure that know one was in danger when he planted his bombs.

  2. Explain why did the Afrikaners set up and established an apartheid state, [in ...

    To escape the British the Afrikaners decided to migrate away. They call this the Great Trek. The British would not leave them alone so they travelled to Transval and the Orange Free State in 1854, hoping they could gain independence and establish their own communities.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work