• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Race Relations in the USA and South Africa since 1945 : How external pressure brought down Apartheid.

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework Assessment Objective 2: Analysis and Explaining the Past Race Relations in the USA and South Africa since 1945 The aim of this essay is to see how the opposition of other countries affected the end of apartheid in South Africa. I shall find this out using statements, books, encyclopedias and the Internet. These will then enable me to write a conclusion. I need to find out whether apartheid ended in South Africa by national or international events. Apartheid is the total segregation of the races. In this case South Africa took it as far as making the Black African citizens stay in their designated country. The White Afrikaans made every Blacks African have a passbook, which said which countries they could enter. The rulers of apartheid gave the Black Africans no political rights; this meant that they could not change the way the country was being run. The only way they could make themselves heard was to riot and protest. Another strange fact about apartheid was that the vast majority of the population was the Blacks, so this meant that the minority had come into their county and total changed society. The British and Dutch colonized South Africa in the seventeenth century. ...read more.


The United Nations soon imposed a trading boycott in 1962, this was to try and get the government to reverse the policy of Apartheid. This was the first step that the international countries took to try and make an end of Apartheid. However trading boycotts prove to be ineffective, this was because in the 1960s they found that South Africa had large amounts of Gold and Diamonds as natural recourses. After the Sharville massacre, investors started to withdraw their money from South Africa, this was because there was a fear of a civil war breaking out. The investors in the 1960s some how managed to pump money into South Africa even though there had been a trading boycott and economic sanctions. The money that was put into South Africa kept them a wealthy country. Economic Sanctions brought a higher standard of living and a better wage to Native Black citerzans, but still there were no political freedom. Foreign govements soon started to cut sporting links with South Africa in particular Rugby and Cricket, which were the most popular for the Whites. In 1968 an African-born cricketer called Basil D'Oliveria was a member of the British Cricket Team, when they were touring South Africa he was refused entry of one of the states. ...read more.


If they had their Buffer Zone they would have a protective wall that would surround their country. The whites of South Africa were becoming worried about the Blacks reclaiming there power and political rights, this meant that when the majority of Blacks were to vote they could then take over the government of South Africa. I think that the International boycotts helped the end of Apartheid, this is because it showed South Africa the anger of the world towards the way they treated the Blacks South Africans. The boycotts did not end Apartheid they were more of a gesture to show the Blacks that they had support in their actions against Apartheid. In conclusion and though sufficient evidence, I think that the importance of the International input to Apartheid had little affect on the end result. The affect that the international opposition had on Apartheid was just to say that they were behind the Blacks movements and to say to South Africa that what they were doing was wrong. The Blacks of South Africa did more to the end Apartheid because they actually held the protests that made the changes. The Blacks had managed to come from a life of poverty and an uneducated child life. So my interpretation of the Coursework question is that the international input was useful to the end of Apartheid but did very little to end it ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    Some defectors were of high rank48. However there was no sign of UNITA relaxing its attitude to peace When the government did declare the effective end of the civil war, there was still no prospect of dialogue between dos Santos and Savimbi.

  2. South Africa 1945-1994 The end of Apartheid.

    External pressures played a very important part in bringing about the end of apartheid. It was the mid 80's when sanctions began to take effect. They were put in place by the rest of the world in hope to see the ending of apartheid.

  1. The ending of white minority rule in South Africa was achieved only because of ...

    It had 83% of the world's platinum. Companies found ways around the laws against trade with South Africa - this meant that the sanctions were not as powerful as they could have been. Also, there was a political motivation - neither Thatcher nor Reagan agreed with apartheid but the fear

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    Since the Maltese deficit was high, when the knights were sent-off the French raised the taxes and besides they also turned to the church things and sold them on auction. Some of these precious things were taken on Napoleon's ship.

  1. In detail describe the historical development of the welfare state since 1945 and how ...

    rather than pay high taxes to pay for services such as the NHS. Her radical ideas greatly affected the welfare state between the years of 1979-1997 as the government introduced means testing and selective welfare. One of the first things Margaret Thatcher did was privatise public services and sold off

  2. American Iran Relations For years, relations between the U.S. and the Middle Eastern country ...

    should seek to foster change through diplomacy and trade. If U.S. officials fail to give up grudges against Iran, supporters argue, they will squander an opportunity to gain a new trading partner and potential ally. Yet others are less optimistic about Iran's prospects for change, and reject the notion that the country deserves of closer commercial and diplomatic ties.

  1. Assess the Extent to which the Different Powers Prepared 'Their' African Colonies for Independence.

    Anti-white feelings are new to the Ivory Coast, becoming widespread after an army mutiny in 2003 and culminating with the murder of a French journalist. Xenophobia has also split into ethnic tensions with a North/South divide that perpetuates the country.

  2. In what ways and for what reasons did British policies and attitude towards Africa ...

    was undoubtedly the most cost effective way of maintaining Empire in British African. Moreover this type of rule frowned upon the emergence of educated Africans, the existence of classes, and even urbanisation. Such western social staples were considered as undesirable in Africa and viewed as the unfortunate by-products of imperialism

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work