• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Race Relations in the USA and South Africa since 1945 : How external pressure brought down Apartheid.

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework Assessment Objective 2: Analysis and Explaining the Past Race Relations in the USA and South Africa since 1945 The aim of this essay is to see how the opposition of other countries affected the end of apartheid in South Africa. I shall find this out using statements, books, encyclopedias and the Internet. These will then enable me to write a conclusion. I need to find out whether apartheid ended in South Africa by national or international events. Apartheid is the total segregation of the races. In this case South Africa took it as far as making the Black African citizens stay in their designated country. The White Afrikaans made every Blacks African have a passbook, which said which countries they could enter. The rulers of apartheid gave the Black Africans no political rights; this meant that they could not change the way the country was being run. The only way they could make themselves heard was to riot and protest. Another strange fact about apartheid was that the vast majority of the population was the Blacks, so this meant that the minority had come into their county and total changed society. The British and Dutch colonized South Africa in the seventeenth century. ...read more.


The United Nations soon imposed a trading boycott in 1962, this was to try and get the government to reverse the policy of Apartheid. This was the first step that the international countries took to try and make an end of Apartheid. However trading boycotts prove to be ineffective, this was because in the 1960s they found that South Africa had large amounts of Gold and Diamonds as natural recourses. After the Sharville massacre, investors started to withdraw their money from South Africa, this was because there was a fear of a civil war breaking out. The investors in the 1960s some how managed to pump money into South Africa even though there had been a trading boycott and economic sanctions. The money that was put into South Africa kept them a wealthy country. Economic Sanctions brought a higher standard of living and a better wage to Native Black citerzans, but still there were no political freedom. Foreign govements soon started to cut sporting links with South Africa in particular Rugby and Cricket, which were the most popular for the Whites. In 1968 an African-born cricketer called Basil D'Oliveria was a member of the British Cricket Team, when they were touring South Africa he was refused entry of one of the states. ...read more.


If they had their Buffer Zone they would have a protective wall that would surround their country. The whites of South Africa were becoming worried about the Blacks reclaiming there power and political rights, this meant that when the majority of Blacks were to vote they could then take over the government of South Africa. I think that the International boycotts helped the end of Apartheid, this is because it showed South Africa the anger of the world towards the way they treated the Blacks South Africans. The boycotts did not end Apartheid they were more of a gesture to show the Blacks that they had support in their actions against Apartheid. In conclusion and though sufficient evidence, I think that the importance of the International input to Apartheid had little affect on the end result. The affect that the international opposition had on Apartheid was just to say that they were behind the Blacks movements and to say to South Africa that what they were doing was wrong. The Blacks of South Africa did more to the end Apartheid because they actually held the protests that made the changes. The Blacks had managed to come from a life of poverty and an uneducated child life. So my interpretation of the Coursework question is that the international input was useful to the end of Apartheid but did very little to end it ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. South Africa 1945-1994 The end of Apartheid.

    External pressures played a very important part in bringing about the end of apartheid. It was the mid 80's when sanctions began to take effect. They were put in place by the rest of the world in hope to see the ending of apartheid.

  2. Apartheid in South Africa sources questions

    As Source E was a white policeman it is likely that he had racist views. This fits in with his suggestion that black people were unintelligent in their spontaneous demonstrations and that their complaints had no political basis. This shows how na�ve his opinions were and how he had no concern about the living of the SA black people.

  1. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    I would like to draw attention to the term 'the churches'. Some analysts use the term 'the Church'.3 This may give the false impression that the churches are one organisation with one voice and belief. While this is what Jesus and St Paul may have wanted4, it is far from the truth in South Africa and Namibia.

  2. South Africa - Apartheid Sources Questions

    would have no use for it in the future as they have no place in the 'European community above the levels of certain forms of labour'. This suggests that there was no point in giving black children an education because it would only disappoint them in later life because they

  1. "The Colonisation of Africa was Inevitable in the Late Nineteenth Century" Discuss.

    There also existed socio-cultural reasons, which favoured the colonisation of Africa. Many moral-guided Europeans regarded it as their duty, being the 'enlightened' and advanced ones, to bring civilisation, progress and the 'true' religion to the backward peoples. Since, Asia, the Americas and Australia were already being sufficiently "lectured" on the

  2. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    GURN was also officially brushed aside by a cabinet reshuffle and President Dos Santos assumed full control over the FAA33. This internal factor brought more cohesion to the MPLA, who were in an increasingly weak position sustaining further losses to UNITA and facing low cash reserves due to falling oil prices.

  1. Apartheid in South Africa.

    Apartheid continued to be criticised internationally, and many countries, including the United States, imposed economic sanctions on South Africa. More revolts erupted and, as pressure on South Africa increased, the government's apartheid policies began to show. In 1990, the new president, F.

  2. Tiananmen Square

    Sources F and G also correspond with what the picture is showing us, students in Tiananmen Square. All these similarities in the different sources can lead to only one conclusion, the demonstration in Tiananmen Square happened, and it involved students.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work