• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Recent general election results have shown the need for electoral reform." Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Politics and Electoral Systems - Questions "Recent general election results have shown the need for electoral reform." Discuss. Whether or not you think there is a need for electoral reform depends on your political view. For instance if you follow the Liberal Democrats then you would certainly agree that there is need for electoral form. However if you were a Conservative supporter you would not agree with that viewpoint as they had an advantage under FPP (First past the post) for a majority of the 20th century. Labour are doing very well out of FPP at the moment and it looks like we may be in a Labour hegemony so they would to disagree with the statement above. Ultimately the need for electoral form depends on your situation in the 'House of Commons.' One of the greatest flaws with FPP is that is very unfair to the third party, in this case the Liberal Democrats. In 1983 the Alliance got 25% of the vote and only 4% of the seats. That's 23 seats out of a possible 659 on 25% of the vote. Whereas Labour got only 2% more in votes but 209 seats. ...read more.


Open list systems are used in Luxembourg and Sweden. STV is used in the Australian Senate and the elections for the Republic and Northern Ireland Assembly. STV is not strictly proportional as Fianna Fail in1987 got 43% of the seats on 44% in the Irish elections. If STV had been used in the 1997 elections Labour would have only had a majority of 25 whereas under FPP he had a majority of 179. Under STV voters rank the candidates for their constituency in order of preference, and seats are won under a quota system. In order to get into Government you need to get above a certain amount of votes (quota). It works with multi-member constituencies, which represent everyone's views much better, constituencies are much bigger, so the argument that larger constituencies breaks down the relationship between candidates and the people comes in again. There are no wasted votes compared to the 70% of wasted votes under FPP. There are two types of list systems; closed and open. Closed list systems give the voter no choices, to which candidate to vote for, only which party. It gives immense power to the Central party Bureaucracy as the candidates are listed in order of preference by the party leadership (putting candidates, which they like nearer, the top of the list) ...read more.


The country is split into regional constituencies like under FPP. Parties must gain at least 5% (in Germany) to get any seats, this is called the Threshold and is used to keep out extremist's parties. Finland and Israel do not have a threshold and this would explain the extremist's parties, which have power there. For example a party with less than 1% of the vote held up the peace process for years in Israel. AMS still does have in flaws, like PR systems it produces coalitions, which can cause many problems. In Germany in 1982 the FDP pulled out of a coalition with the SPD and went into coalition with the CDU without consulting the electorate. The Voters were furious, as they were not consulted. In conclusion to this question I believe that it purely depends on your situation within the houses of commons or which party you follow. FPP does produces strong, effective, stable governments even if it does not represent power fairly from all aspects. But then again do any of the systems I have been through. FPP marginalises the third party, PR gives power out of all proportion to the smaller parties. Switches in marginal constituencies determine much of the political agenda under FPP. The voters do not get to choose the government under PR; the parties do through horse-trading. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    What have been the effects of the use of proportional electoral systems in the ...

    3 star(s)

    However, it also ensures that the majority of the public have their views represented by a party they voted for.

  2. Why did Labour lose the 1951 General Election?

    Although progress was initially slow on this front, one million houses were eventually built and the housing problem was eased for a while. This massive reform of the 1945-1946 period was dealt a blow in February 1947, when the government faced a fuel crisis.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Can encourage the election of women (and minorities). If a party puts a woman on the electoral list, she may get elected based on the party's overall popularity. Women are less likely to get elected in some countries if they are directly facing a male candidate in election.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    In 1871 we had the new dock, the Somerset Dock that employed roundabout 1,000 men working day and night. This dock 3 showed the necessity to improve naval facilities at the Maltese base. At this point worth mentioning is that this era became known as the Golden Age of Malta.

  1. Who would you vote for?

    They did the right thing in letting the Bank of England decide inflation rates and keeping unemployment down. However, now that Gordon is PM, will Alistair Darling be able to continue in his footsteps? He certainly has a lot of experience as an MP (serving as a frontbencher under Neil Kinnock), but has never had this sort of role before.

  2. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    Basically, they wanted full independence. Foreseeing the outcome, the SNP backed down and Alex Salmond, the leader of the SNP, made a coalition of sorts with Blair. Salmon argued, "The House of Commons doesn't have time or enough interest to meet the real political needs of Scotland.

  1. What advice would you give to Labor Leadership in light of the recent research ...

    THE NEW VOTER TRENDS, Socio-psycological Model and Issue Voting. There numerous factors that influence voter behavior, and these influences act in complicated ways to dictate party support. However, there are two significant and easily exploitable trends in modern voting behavior, socio-psycological party attachment and issue voting.

  2. Electoral reform: Following the 2005 general election is it time for the government to ...

    Another problem with the current voting system is that many people's votes don't actually matter. If you are a labour voter in rural Norfolk or a conservative in much or Birmingham your vote is not likely to have any effect on the election result, since your party has no chance of actually winning that seat.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work