• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Recent general election results have shown the need for electoral reform." Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Politics and Electoral Systems - Questions "Recent general election results have shown the need for electoral reform." Discuss. Whether or not you think there is a need for electoral reform depends on your political view. For instance if you follow the Liberal Democrats then you would certainly agree that there is need for electoral form. However if you were a Conservative supporter you would not agree with that viewpoint as they had an advantage under FPP (First past the post) for a majority of the 20th century. Labour are doing very well out of FPP at the moment and it looks like we may be in a Labour hegemony so they would to disagree with the statement above. Ultimately the need for electoral form depends on your situation in the 'House of Commons.' One of the greatest flaws with FPP is that is very unfair to the third party, in this case the Liberal Democrats. In 1983 the Alliance got 25% of the vote and only 4% of the seats. That's 23 seats out of a possible 659 on 25% of the vote. Whereas Labour got only 2% more in votes but 209 seats. ...read more.


Open list systems are used in Luxembourg and Sweden. STV is used in the Australian Senate and the elections for the Republic and Northern Ireland Assembly. STV is not strictly proportional as Fianna Fail in1987 got 43% of the seats on 44% in the Irish elections. If STV had been used in the 1997 elections Labour would have only had a majority of 25 whereas under FPP he had a majority of 179. Under STV voters rank the candidates for their constituency in order of preference, and seats are won under a quota system. In order to get into Government you need to get above a certain amount of votes (quota). It works with multi-member constituencies, which represent everyone's views much better, constituencies are much bigger, so the argument that larger constituencies breaks down the relationship between candidates and the people comes in again. There are no wasted votes compared to the 70% of wasted votes under FPP. There are two types of list systems; closed and open. Closed list systems give the voter no choices, to which candidate to vote for, only which party. It gives immense power to the Central party Bureaucracy as the candidates are listed in order of preference by the party leadership (putting candidates, which they like nearer, the top of the list) ...read more.


The country is split into regional constituencies like under FPP. Parties must gain at least 5% (in Germany) to get any seats, this is called the Threshold and is used to keep out extremist's parties. Finland and Israel do not have a threshold and this would explain the extremist's parties, which have power there. For example a party with less than 1% of the vote held up the peace process for years in Israel. AMS still does have in flaws, like PR systems it produces coalitions, which can cause many problems. In Germany in 1982 the FDP pulled out of a coalition with the SPD and went into coalition with the CDU without consulting the electorate. The Voters were furious, as they were not consulted. In conclusion to this question I believe that it purely depends on your situation within the houses of commons or which party you follow. FPP does produces strong, effective, stable governments even if it does not represent power fairly from all aspects. But then again do any of the systems I have been through. FPP marginalises the third party, PR gives power out of all proportion to the smaller parties. Switches in marginal constituencies determine much of the political agenda under FPP. The voters do not get to choose the government under PR; the parties do through horse-trading. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    What have been the effects of the use of proportional electoral systems in the ...

    3 star(s)

    classes of MPs now exist; ones with responsibilities for constituencies and others with no regional duties. A major effect of the system is the strong likelihood of a coalition government. This can be viewed in part as undemocratic, since a coalition compromise manifesto has not been given the public's mandate.

  2. Why did Labour lose the 1951 General Election?

    Although progress was initially slow on this front, one million houses were eventually built and the housing problem was eased for a while. This massive reform of the 1945-1946 period was dealt a blow in February 1947, when the government faced a fuel crisis.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Further, in highly divided societies a semi-proportional system would likely lead to less polarisation than in a PR system. It provides for a stronger link between legislators and their constituents, since legislators represent particular geographic areas rather than just parties.

  2. Explain the main characteristics of the following electoral systems, Alternative Vote, PR List (open ...

    This electoral system also produces a stable government but has a slow and exhaustive ballot. The system used in Germany is called A.M.S. It was adopted in West Germany in 1949 but is now extended to United Germany.

  1. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    New Labour and the SNP formed an unlikely alliance which ended shortly after victory in the referendum. As well as the difference in powers from Westminster, the Scottish Parliament also has a different composition. It is made up of 129 members, as mentioned before, with 73 from constituencies elected on

  2. The 1906 General Election saw a convincing Liberal landslide of 399 Liberal seats to ...

    The Boer War demonstrated how dangerous such an economic decline could prove to be. However, the culpability of the Conservative Party went deeper than this. Germany's rate of steel production increased at a greater rate than Britain's from as early as 1880, and would suggest that Britain had been outstripped

  1. 'Personal and party advantages were the motivating forces for the passing of the 1867 ...

    radical reform bill in 1867 than the Liberal bill which they opposed in 1866. Many modern historians have looked to the theory that it was purely for personal and party advantages. To Derby and Disraeli it seemed clear that if the issue of reform could be kept alive it would

  2. Should the UK reform its system for General Elections?

    gets a disproportionate amount of seats in comparison to the vote. Not only does First Past The Post make it very hard for the Liberal Democrats to get a seat (one seat cost them over 90,000 votes in 2001), but as they are not in Government, the Party's manifesto cannot

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work