• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Recent general election results have shown the need for electoral reform." Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Politics and Electoral Systems - Questions "Recent general election results have shown the need for electoral reform." Discuss. Whether or not you think there is a need for electoral reform depends on your political view. For instance if you follow the Liberal Democrats then you would certainly agree that there is need for electoral form. However if you were a Conservative supporter you would not agree with that viewpoint as they had an advantage under FPP (First past the post) for a majority of the 20th century. Labour are doing very well out of FPP at the moment and it looks like we may be in a Labour hegemony so they would to disagree with the statement above. Ultimately the need for electoral form depends on your situation in the 'House of Commons.' One of the greatest flaws with FPP is that is very unfair to the third party, in this case the Liberal Democrats. In 1983 the Alliance got 25% of the vote and only 4% of the seats. That's 23 seats out of a possible 659 on 25% of the vote. Whereas Labour got only 2% more in votes but 209 seats. ...read more.


Open list systems are used in Luxembourg and Sweden. STV is used in the Australian Senate and the elections for the Republic and Northern Ireland Assembly. STV is not strictly proportional as Fianna Fail in1987 got 43% of the seats on 44% in the Irish elections. If STV had been used in the 1997 elections Labour would have only had a majority of 25 whereas under FPP he had a majority of 179. Under STV voters rank the candidates for their constituency in order of preference, and seats are won under a quota system. In order to get into Government you need to get above a certain amount of votes (quota). It works with multi-member constituencies, which represent everyone's views much better, constituencies are much bigger, so the argument that larger constituencies breaks down the relationship between candidates and the people comes in again. There are no wasted votes compared to the 70% of wasted votes under FPP. There are two types of list systems; closed and open. Closed list systems give the voter no choices, to which candidate to vote for, only which party. It gives immense power to the Central party Bureaucracy as the candidates are listed in order of preference by the party leadership (putting candidates, which they like nearer, the top of the list) ...read more.


The country is split into regional constituencies like under FPP. Parties must gain at least 5% (in Germany) to get any seats, this is called the Threshold and is used to keep out extremist's parties. Finland and Israel do not have a threshold and this would explain the extremist's parties, which have power there. For example a party with less than 1% of the vote held up the peace process for years in Israel. AMS still does have in flaws, like PR systems it produces coalitions, which can cause many problems. In Germany in 1982 the FDP pulled out of a coalition with the SPD and went into coalition with the CDU without consulting the electorate. The Voters were furious, as they were not consulted. In conclusion to this question I believe that it purely depends on your situation within the houses of commons or which party you follow. FPP does produces strong, effective, stable governments even if it does not represent power fairly from all aspects. But then again do any of the systems I have been through. FPP marginalises the third party, PR gives power out of all proportion to the smaller parties. Switches in marginal constituencies determine much of the political agenda under FPP. The voters do not get to choose the government under PR; the parties do through horse-trading. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    What have been the effects of the use of proportional electoral systems in the ...

    3 star(s)

    classes of MPs now exist; ones with responsibilities for constituencies and others with no regional duties. A major effect of the system is the strong likelihood of a coalition government. This can be viewed in part as undemocratic, since a coalition compromise manifesto has not been given the public's mandate.

  2. Why did Labour lose the 1951 General Election?

    Although progress was initially slow on this front, one million houses were eventually built and the housing problem was eased for a while. This massive reform of the 1945-1946 period was dealt a blow in February 1947, when the government faced a fuel crisis.

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    And knew the Italian and English language. The voter had to have a clean conduct and had a certain amount of money or lands. The election was very successful as nearly everybody eligible to vote went to vote. The Maltese grumbled on the fact that the franchise was based on financial qualifications.

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    The PM elements allow for direct representation, while the PR elements allow for some minority representation and party accountability. It provides an opportunity for popular independent candidates to be elected, particularly important in developing countries where parties are weak and candidates may be selected based on kinship or patronage.

  1. Explain the main characteristics of the following electoral systems, Alternative Vote, PR List (open ...

    This electoral system also produces a stable government but has a slow and exhaustive ballot. The system used in Germany is called A.M.S. It was adopted in West Germany in 1949 but is now extended to United Germany.

  2. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    This will change now we have our own Parliament devoted to getting the best deal for Scotland and giving us a real say in the running of our country."4 He went on to comment, "The independent Parliament that I seek would put even more power in Scotland's hands.

  1. Who would you vote for?

    I find what the Conservatives have to say quite funny. Not for the first time they criticise Labour for their handling of private rail companies- when it was them that privatised the railways in the first place! They make vague promises about expanding rail capacity and making it the 'heart' of the transport system, but carelessly neglect to explain how.

  2. What advice would you give to Labor Leadership in light of the recent research ...

    Because of the publics perception of Conservatives being elitists of one race, age, class and gender, Labor can alienate the Conservatives by defining them as White Old Rich Men (W.O.R.M.). If New Labor is able to stigmatize the conservative party they will win voters or at least drive Tory support to the Liberal Democrats.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work