• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Referendums. Although Referendums can provide clear decisive answers on difficult political issues, they also have many disadvantages to them.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Past Paper Question on Referenda. 1/ A referendum is a vote on a single issue that is put before the electorate by the government, usually in the form of a question that requires a yes or no answer. Contrastingly an election is the process by which the people of an area (constituency) choose one of many candidates contesting elections, as their representative to hold official offices. They do so by casting their votes, so an election is the choosing of representatives by the people. In a referendum the decision of the electorate is not binding, as the government aren't bound by the result. However, in an election, the result of the voting is final. Another difference is that an election is not a decision on a single issue, but a decision on which representative has a favoured opinion on many issues. In this way an election affects a far broader number of issues, whereas a referendum is usually just addressing one main issue. ...read more.

Middle

Unlike the Welsh referendum (1997) turnout was high suggesting a lack of voter apathy and thus a real connection from the electorate to this issue. The result of this referendum is a clear YES and reinforced the importance and usefulness of a referendum on simple answer (but complicated) issues. The government in response to this result passed the Northern Ireland Act 1998. The Scottish referendum in 1997 was a pre-legislative referendum ,over whether there was support for the creation of a parliament for Scotland and whether there was support for a parliament with tax varying powers. Voter turnout was adequate with 60.1% voting and the result was once again a decisive one with 74.3% voting YES and 25.7% voting No. The electorate were well informed and therefore showed great interest in the political issue, as opposed to previous referendums (1979 -far more indecisive result). The Scottish public voted in favour for tax raising powers for the Scottish parliament and therefore, n response to the majority voting for both proposals, the United Kingdom Parliament passed the Scotland Act in 1998, creating the Scottish Parliament and Scottish Executive. ...read more.

Conclusion

Referendums are also victim to the media and other agencies who can significantly influence a result, making them invalid or causing "unjustified" change in opinion e.g. Rich pressure groups, who may cause voters to be swayed by emotion rather than reason. A regular occurrence with referendums however, is that of low turnout and voter apathy towards issues. This can harm the referendum by creating a result lacking in credibility. An example of low turnout and voter apathy is the November 2004 referendum on whether there should be a North East Assembly; here there was only a 48% turnout indicating a fairly low level of interest on the subject and high levels of voter apathy. This meant that the result (a resounding no by 78%) lack validity. A concluding failure of referenda is that the decisions made are not final, as the government can go back on them if they want. This undermines the whole process and creates a weakened system of representative democracy. Hari Sethi Gov/Politics Mr Hitching 11/10/07 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Evaluate the case for using Referenda to decide important issues in the UK

    4 star(s)

    Both times Scotland had the majority vote in the favour to allow them more power; although the first referendum results were incisive enough for power to be devolved to Scottish parliament. In 1979 Wales lost the vote 20.3% to 79.7% and then in 1997 only won the vote by 0.6%.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Evaluate the case for using referenda to decide important issues in the UK

    3 star(s)

    Some people may have a tendency to vote passionately without the understanding of the true politics involved with the issue. It is clear from the examples that referendums are not always as conclusive as would be hoped. This is because there are often rules set on the majority that must

  1. Arguments for and Against the use of Referendums in the UK

    were followed, there would be less room for criticism and more chance for direct democracy. Referendums shouldn't be used to simply side-step parliamentary procedures, and they should not be a substitute for parliamentary democracy; they should be used whenever the public show they have strong views on an issue, either through petitions or pressure groups.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the devolution process in Scotland and Wales?

    Devolution has been successful in this way because it has prevented any kind of surge towards full independence by either Scotland or Wales. There were concerns that the Scottish Nationalists majority hold over the Scottish Parliament after the elections in 2007 would lead to further demands for full independence.

  1. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    Dixon put forward two main proposals: 1) holding a plebiscite through the entire state, one region at a time, or 2) only holding a plebiscite in regions which were doubtful those that would definitely vote for accession to India or Pakistan would be allocated to those countries without a vote.

  2. In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, ...

    The Presiding Officer chairs meetings of the Parliament and maintains a stance of political neutrality. The Scottish Parliament is staffed by public servants who serve the Parliament as a whole. Like the Presiding Officer, they must also remain neutral. After devolution in 1999 the powers and duties exercised by Ministers

  1. Scottish devolution.

    Matters like firearms, immigration, asylum seekers, animal testing, film licensing and hypnosis are still reserved only for Westminster to legislate on. National security, Official Secrets, betting & lotteries, and passports laws can only be changed by Westminster. * Trade and Industry - Matters such as competition, insolvency, import and export controls and consumer protection, are reserved for Westminster.

  2. Russia - political past, present and future

    Duma serves to draft laws and different policies. When a certain law or a bill is approved by the majority vote in the Duma it then goes to the Federation Council and once it is passed it heads directly for president's signature.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work