• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reformation of The House of Lords

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Reformation of The House of Lords B.Pringle The current composition of The House of Lords initial composition consists of 92 hereditary peers who are dominantly the most recent ones appointed. This is to provide some continuity with the existing system. Each newly appointed member of the House is a life member. There is a maximum number of members, 700. New members are added after every UK General Election, to bring the total membership up to the notional maximum. No new members are added to replace members who die or retire in between General Elections. The overall composition is roughly in proportion to the long-term popularity of the various parties. Particular elections only affect the proportion of new members added. This makes the House stable politically. Another aspect, which makes the composition of the House diverse and objective, is the presence of 'crossbench peers'. These peers are not affiliated with a particular party; this group makes up about a third of the House. ...read more.

Middle

Although the countryside may be a minority they are a powerful community and representation in the Lords made up for their sometimes-apparent lack of representation in the Commons. The continuation of hereditary peerage would remove the often-scandalous issue of the appointing of life peers. Life peers could be seen as political payoffs by the government of the day. This sort of appointment may give the government of the time a short-term benefit, but it's no way to appoint life-long members of our parliament system. There are also many arguments for the following through of the plan to completely abolish hereditary peerage. From a Labour sympathetic political stance it is easy to see why they want to abolish hereditary peers. Any time the Tories want their specific view made apparent and a majority in the Lords, they can wheel in (in some cases literally) large amounts of conservative peers who have little to no actual political interest in the matter. ...read more.

Conclusion

This sort of distrust from one tier of our political system to the other cannot be healthy for our political system and so obviously needed reform. The Wakeham commission made several recommendations on the second stage of the House of Lords reform (whether they will be put in place we are yet to see, but the outlook is doubtful after initial response to the 'white paper'). Around 20% of the membership would be made up of independent cross benchers, and existing life peers would stay on to ensure a smooth change over to the new arrangements. Most members of the reformed chamber would remain appointed by an independent commission. The political balance of the second chamber should reflect votes cast at the general election. A totally independent appointments system, in which the prime minister and government would play no part. A statutory minimum of 30% women members, fair representation for ethnic minority groups, and a broader range of religious representation than at present; Increased powers to scrutinise the executive and challenge government legislation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    was introduced in the Commons on 19 January 1999 and received Royal Assent on 11 November 1999. Section 1 of the House of Lords Act 1999 provides that no one shall be a member of the House of Lords by virtue of a hereditary peerage.

  2. Discuss the possible changes to the membership of the house of Lords

    20% of the Mls would be elected by proportional representation in their regional constitutions. The power this would give the political parties over nominations for appointed members created a great diversity of opinions as Mps felt that this would reduce the House of Commons former dominance over the House of Lords.

  1. What options do the Government have in their attempts to reform the House of ...

    This has a possibility of being vote for, it is the upper end of most reformers expectations. The fifth option is to have a 60% appointed, 40% elected House. This is backed by opponents to a fully elected house who recognise compromise is necessary.

  2. "The present make up and powers of the House of Lords are unsatisfactory and ...

    "watch dog of the constitution ...but one which could only bark and not bite." During the late 1940's it seemed as if the House of Lords would cease to exist in a few years as its powers were shrivelled away and the Lords would not be keen to sit in

  1. Civil Service Reform.

    that there are considerable limitations to the extent that Conservative reforms have met the three Es criteria. (ii) Management Initiatives : The Efficiency Unit and the FMI Two management innovations, introduced in the first years of Mrs Thatcher's first government continue to have significant impact on the character and operating

  2. A House Divided.

    Even though there still were indentured servants in the northern colonies, they were less oppressed than those in the southern colonies. In addition, there were also quite a heterogeneous population in the Northern colonies, and contact between blacks and whites occurred more frequently there than in the Southern colonies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work