• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Role of political action commitees

Extracts from this document...


What is the role of Political Action Committees (PACs)? > Intro. Definition of PACs - a separate campaign fund of a p.g. or a fund of a group formed primarily for the purpose of giving money to candidates. They are non - party organisations, although some do give to parties as well as individual candidates. > Early History. First PAC established by unions in the 1940's. 1963 Business Industry PAC, followed later by AMPAC (AMA) to fight "socialised medicine". > 1971 FECA and Amendments of 1974. Big spur to PACs. After Watergate era (Fat Cats giving money to Nixon) individual donations limited, but PACs were not limited in the total level of giving (just $5000 to any single campaign). This gets round the legal limits on direct contributions to candidates. PACs can receive such finance provided no single donation is above $5000. > 1975 Sun Oil Case. Federal Elections Commission ruled that corporate PACs were legal. > 1976 Buckley v. ...read more.


In 2000 election 40% of candidates campaign funds came from PACs. Leaders in Congress get most of the money. Often reverse lobbying takes place- Congressmen lobbying PACs for money. most controversial form of spending is on "independent expenditure" (for /against a candidate). Leads to negative advertising. Senator Lloyd Bentson said "These so-called independent groups...reap the advantages of lies and distortion and then force the candidate to spend funds to set the record straight". > Voting in Congress. Common Cause has found clear correlations between PAC contribution and votes on Bills in Congress. But recent research (Larry Sabato - 'PAC Power') has suggested there is little evidence for this (usually vote because of constituents, ideology, party, leaders, influence of White House). Also little evidence to suggest buying of votes in Congressional Committees. > The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain-Feingold) 2002 was passed by President Bush to limit the actions of PACs (sceptics would claim that this related to the fact that PAC money was higher for Democrats than Republicans). ...read more.


The biggest Republican 527 is Progress for America. Recent research suggests that 527s replaced some, but not the majority of soft money. In 2004 the big three 527 groups raised a total of $186m, almost half the $405m raised by all 527 groups. In 2004 smaller anti-Kerry 527 groups 'Swift Boat Vets' and 'POWs for Truth' hurt the Democratic presidential campaign. Note also the effective use of the internet in 2004 and 2006 to boost small donations, and the bundling of hard money contributions by the Bush campaign in 2000 through the Bush Pioneer bundling programme, i.e., instead of handing over a cheque for $100,000 to a candidate's party from a business corporation or trade union (soft money), you hand a candidate 50 cheques of $2,000 each from different people (hard money). This is called bundling and gets around the BCRA ban on six figure soft money contributions to parties. > Recent Moves for Reform. Every year there are further suggestions for reform (including banning PACs, reducing funding). However surveys show that most people prefer PACs, rather than having to pay for campaigns through taxation (Time/CNN poll). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    Some portions of the redemption dues had been abolished. Nevertheless, no radical effort was made to lighten the load of indirect taxation which fell mostly upon the peasantry. Most of the state revenue came from taxes levied upon vodka, tobacco, matches and paraffin. The introduction of a graduated income tax would have done much to lighten this burden.

  2. personal exercis programme

    I also applied the 'Time' principle to the rock climbing by increasing the time spent on the wall by a further ten minutes. I continuously ran for thirteen minutes therefore I also applied the 'Time' principle to the run as I only ran for twelve minutes in week four.

  1. Is the Media an independent political actor?

    Mark Curtis corroborates this statement agreeing, "The most influential mainstream media outlets are mainly large corporations in the business of maximising profits."3 Given their financial assets they are independent of government control, as they are privately owned, however Jones and Kavanagh duplicate this information and continue, "It is widely asserted


    According to this Report sector-wise corruption in Bangladesh is as follows: Police ------------------- 20.67% Local govt. ---------------- 11.67% Education -------------- 10.93% Health -------------------- 7.8% Others ------------------ 48.92% Total ------------------- 100% Source: T. I. B. Dainik Snag bad, 6th October 2002 & Internet Centre for Corruption research.

  1. Slavery in Latin America

    When new elections were held in Sept., 1973, Per�n was elected president and his third wife, Isabel Mart�nez Per�n, vice president. Per�n died in July, 1974, and was succeeded by his widow. Her government faced economic troubles, labor unrest, political violence, and deep divisions within the Peronista party.

  2. Why is corruption so prominent in the contemporary Latin American political scene?

    The increase in populist leaders across Latin America does not bode well for either resolving or reducing cases of corruption. A major problem which almost all Latin American states have faced regarding the fight again corruption is that is that it is often widely accepted by the general population.

  1. Pressure Groups.

    If someone is killed the government will be accused of not maintaining a democratic society where everybody has the right to put forward their opinions, peacefully. The reputation of the political party will be damaged because the public will think that the government does not reflect the views of the nation.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    Managers in pursuit of financial/efficiency targets are free to pursue value-for-money initiatives. Gray and Jenkins point out that, '... the Next Steps programme assumes that good management requires a discipline of targets both to focus and motivate managers and to assess performance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work