• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Russia - political past, present and future

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Russia never associated as a democracy in anyone's mind. It had always been an authoritarian regime of different species and developed a mentality, which creates an almost unsurpassable obstacle for democratic development. Unlike Britain, which took gradual and methodical steps towards democracy, Russia always had abrupt and extreme changes that always created chaos and significantly slowed down the development of the democratic system. By the end of the 20th century Russia finally embarked on a pragmatic course towards democracy, however it certainly prognosis a long establishment. Russia's history and culture traces back for over a thousand years, which left deep marks in the mentality of Russian people and certainly had a great impact in Russia's political and cultural development. Russia was always somewhat different from most of the European countries; it was isolated by different political principals and convictions. From the early historical development Russia took a different route from the rest of Europe. It adopted the orthodox religion from the Byzantine Empire and became the center of orthodoxy, the main religion of present Russian Federation, while most European states had Roman Catholicism. Besides religion Russia also acquired the Cyrillic alphabet that is still used today, instead of Latin alphabet that was used throughout Western Europe. However, the biggest difference between Russian and the west were the contrasting polity developments. During the Middle Ages Russia was occupied by the Mongols. The Mongol dominion inclined Russia towards autocracy and a threat of further invasion triggered Russia to create an autocratic regime, which from their perspective would create a better defensive environment. Russia's size and multicultural population was a big threat for disintegration, and thus required a strong centralized government. After the middle ages most of Europe began slow democratization process. For example Britain was sailing away from autocratic feudal system, developing a political system with more even distribution of authority. Russia on the other hand gave no signs of democratic idea and still had single rulers know as czars. ...read more.

Middle

The president has an authority to choose a prime minister to run the bureaucracy and any ministers to take charge of the bureaucratic branches; however, his choices must first pass the parliament before they could be applied. If the parliament disagrees with the president's choices they could make a "no confidence move" and if they expression objection three times, the president has a right to dissolve the parliament and initiate new elections with a hope that newly chosen members would appeal more to his ideas. With the same ease the president may remove a prime minister and a minister from the office, but without the parliaments approval. In Russia the prime minister does not hold as much power as in Britain. In Russia, the prime minister's main role is to operate the bureaucracy and do the work to develop economic and social sectors of the country. The leading responsibility in Russia falls on the president, thus he is in charge of representing Russia on international level, sketching out Russia's political and economic strategies, and Being the head of the Security Council, to assure the safety of state burdens. The parliament in Russia, unlike the parliament in Britain posses more power and is able to challenge the president's authority. One major thing is the vote of no confidence, which was mentioned earlier. It allows the parliament to control president's decisions to certain extent. The president certainly has an ability to dissolve the parliament after the third no confidence vote, but that would be an unpopular choice to make and would be done only under very radical circumstances. Another powerful tool that the parliament in Russia has in an ability to impeach the president if he commits a crime, makes an act of treason, or does any other move that challenges the constitution. The British parliament has almost no authority to remove the primer minister; it could only be done within the party from which the prime minister emerged. ...read more.

Conclusion

The public cannot accept the fact that such a massive and strong country cannot suppress a couple terrorist groups in Chechnya. This played a big role during all presidential elections and plays a tremendously significant role in Russia's political and social development. Censorship and strict control over media was always an attribute of an autocratic government. Throughout history Russia experienced strong censorship during the Czarist and Soviet periods. When Yeltsin came to power, he created a much more liberal criterions on censorship and freedom of speech. If Russia is striving to acquire democracy, then why did the new President Vladimir Putin bring back the controlled press and media? Soon after his inauguration, the most popular television channel in Russia HTB was placed under a big controversy. Putin felt that HTB revealed Russian government and the president himself from a "wrong" angle and band the channel by getting rid of the HTB owner and the rest of his crew. The HTB soon reappeared under a new supervision. This act was followed by significant disapproval of public as well as of the Duma. Many Russian citizens filled the streets with demonstration posters feeling that the weak developing democracy and their freedom is being abused. The people felt that after attempting to leave the authoritarian system and establishing a new democratic one, Putin is trying to gear political development to a dictatorship. It is rather difficult to tell precisely where Putin's polity and actions will take Russia in the future. Will he develop a democracy or turn back to autocracy? Might sound a little poetic, but realistically speaking Russia is still far to match the examples of western democracies. The long established historical influence and mentality must be cleared away through generations and generations, before the people would be ready to accept democracy. For now Russia should attempt to make smart choices, which would push it towards the democratic dream. Who knows, maybe a several decades years later our great grandchildren would be writing papers and doing studies on the great Russian phenomenon: The great transition from complete autocracy to a most successful democracy. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    The following quote is in support of this view; "...Kemal was a hero, adored and feared, but never despised."7 In much literature it is stated that many held Ataturk in very high regards. Furthermore, at this point in time it is important to mention that Ataturk's work is consider a

  2. To what extent was Northumberland more successful in solving mid Tudor political problems than ...

    Initially these measures helped to prevent the widespread popular discontent from turning into actual revolt.

  1. Assess the impact of the Vikings on the political development of western Europe in ...

    The Vikings demonstrated the importance of military prowess in a leader, as this was one of their main requisites for power. Their recognition of kingship followed a warrior's "pre-eminence in war".3 This contributed to the desire within Europe for strong combatant leaders and the considerable significance of military policy in government.

  2. "The British Parliament is weak whereas the US Congress is powerful." Discuss.

    Introducing laws that are not scrutinised or debated by the British Parliament is in breach of the convention that says that Parliament is the supreme law making body of the UK. Furthermore, increasing globalisation means that there is a limit to what can be done, especially in the economic sphere.

  1. What impact did Mao have on the lives of the Chinese people from 1949 ...

    Possibly one million people had been killed and a whole generation had missed out on their education. In 1981, the government estimated that 120 million people under the age of 45 could not read or write. Industrial output had fallen drastically, with some factories been shut for three years.

  2. How important is the Vice President (20 Marks)

    In addition, the President may also have an important advisory role to the President. For example, Al Gore on environment policy-such as the Kyoto Protocol. The vice president is also important as he is a 'heartbeat away' from the President and must be ready to take over in the case of an emergency.

  1. Is the President the Most Powerful Man In the World?

    that the most 'powerful man in the world' , will most certainly lose some of his integrity and tarnish his reputation if he faces such a process.

  2. How much influence does the media have on the political process

    had been found in Iraq; world public opinion favored the U.S. going to war with Iraq. The polls conducted by the Program on International Policy (PIPA) at the University of Maryland and Knowledge Networks show that only 23 percent of those who got their information mainly from PBS or NPR

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work