• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the 1997 general election be viewed as a 'critical election'?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should the 1997 general election be viewed as a 'critical election'? In this essay I will assess whether or not the 1997 general election can be seen as a critical election or just an election, which didn't bear much significance to the way Britain, is now. A critical election is defined as 'those exceptional contests, which produce abrupt, significant and durable realignments in the electorate with major consequences for the long term party order'1. Within the critical election there are three inter related features that are, realignments in the ideological basis of party competition; realignments in the social basis of party support and realignments in the partisan loyalties in electorate. Using many different sources I will try to come to a suitable conclusion as to whether or not the 1997 general election caused an abrupt and significant change in the electorate and the parties themselves and the way in which Britain is now run today. In the 1997 election, the Conservatives lost to the great opposition after 18 years in power. "By the time John Major finally got around to calling the 1997 election, almost everyone knew Labour was going to win, the only question was by how much" 2. That was the feeling throughout the majority of Britain and there are many reasons for this belief. Although the Conservative party won the general election in 1992, they lost electoral support due to the fact that they increased tax after they criticized the way that the Labour party were planning to raise taxes themselves. This resulted in the electorate feeling betrayed and the loss of two by - elections to the Liberal Democrats. ...read more.

Middle

This quote shows one of the main changes that occurred within the Labour party and this was the getting rid of the commitments to the shared ownership of business. Labour was no longer, a party just for Socialists; it was a party, that with a few more minor changes would eventually appeal to the whole electorate, not just a segment of it, this was 'New Labour' with new ideas. With New Labours new policies with regard to businesses, and the issues that the party were dealing with, such as trade unions etc, New Labour were going to make sure that it was appealing to the whole of the electorate not just part of it. The 1997 general election can be seen as a critical election due to the fact after the Tories lost the election, the Labour party fundamentally changed the ways in which elections are fought and the ways in which the parties act. The Labour party enhanced the way in they ran their party and this was due to their victory over the Conservative party in 1997. One of the areas in which the Labour party managed to exploit and bring into play was the use of media and the 'spin' which they were now able to use and turn a lot of things to their advantage. The Labour party used the media to highlight and therefore intensify the problems, which were occurring in the Conservative party throughout the general election. The party would make sure that all the Tories problems were being spread over all the newspapers, which was undermining the Conservative election campaign. ...read more.

Conclusion

The 2001 election results to some extent emulated the 1997 election results with Labour once again winning comfortably, and the general consensus is that the Labour party will be in power for quite a whilst as it is now the Conservative party who are lacking the focus of direction, and with party divisions still occurring, it is hard to see Labour being forced out. So in conclusion to the question "should the 1997 general election be viewed as a critical election?" I conclude that the 1997 election was indeed critical. Having studied the party fortunes, the changes that have occurred e.g., the change of moving away from Socialism, which Labour made in order to make it possible for them to win the general election and the loss of confidence by the electorate towards the conservatives, it is hard not to conclude the election as critical. The fact that the Labour party managed to realign the electorate to vote for them, moving away from socialism and getting rid of all the problems which dodged them for some many years previously such as problems with trade unions etc and, also the fact that the party changed in order to become eligible for everyone is an indication of how the 97 election fits the critical election definition to a good extent. The Labour party has only been in power for 6 years now but with the Conservative party not having a change in fortune at the current time, it is safe to say that the 1997 election can be seen as durable as Labour are probably going to stay in power for a significant amount of time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Why did Labour lose the 1951 General Election?

    This committed the UK government to keeping the value of sterling at a stable rate against the US dollar, and this meant that the government's hands were tied as they sought to address Britain's balance of payments deficit by means of international trade.

  2. Did the Labour Party show that it could govern Britain competently in the years ...

    Also, some historians have argued that the fact that Labour did not take Britain off the "Gold Standard" immediately after the 1929 slump, showed that they were economically incompetent, and unable to govern effectively in times of national crisis. On the 31st July, the "May Report" was published.

  1. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    the capitalist system is inevitable, while Democratic Socialism argue for a more gradual approach using the existing democratic situation to gain power and then to transform gradually the state. Moreover, their aim is "to alter the balance of power in society to such an extent that the capitalist system ceases to exist".

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Australia is divided into 148 single-member constituencies. Instead of a simple 'X', voters rank their preferences among candidate (1,2,3...). To win, candidates need an absolute majority of votes. Where no-one gets over 50 per cent after first preferences are counted, then the candidate at the bottom of the pile with the lowest share of the vote is eliminated, and their votes are redistributed amongst the other candidates.

  1. How far do you agree that the role of the Trade Unions was the ...

    Lloyd George lost 293 votes to 106. This caused the Liberal Party to split weakening the party to a degree, which would not allow them to reform in the near future. Again the problems in the Liberal party had created opportunity for the Labour party to grow.

  2. "Recent general election results have shown the need for electoral reform." Discuss.

    Supporters of FPP claim that there is a strong link between the MP's and their constituents because constituencies are small. Whereas under electoral systems using multi-member constituencies such as Additional Member system and the Single transferable vote. They claim that other electoral systems break down this link.

  1. Nationalism as applied to business

    Criticisms of Anderson's Theory 1. Culturally reductionist 2. His arguments concerning nationalism and religion do not hold in certain cases 3. His thesis that nationalism was born in the Americas runs counter to available evidence 4. His theory concerning anti-colonial nationalisms seems flawed Colony : * a body of people

  2. Is New Labour a Conservative Party?

    Workers in the companies were offered cut price shares to encourage them to own part of the business this further removed the need for trade unions intervention. Thatcher encouraged everybody in society to play a part in ownership in the companies they worked and in the houses they live in.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work