• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

Should the 1997 general election be viewed as a 'critical election'?

Extracts from this document...


PL2013 031947237 Bibliography Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980-2000 - Peter Mair and Ingrid van Biezen, 2001 New Labour Triumphs- Britain at the Polls: Anthony King Http://www.newsint-archive.co.uk/pages/main.asp British Politics: Continuities and Change. 4th edn (2000)- D Kavenagh How the general election was won and lost 1997: Nicholas Jones PL2013 031947237 Should the 1997 general election be viewed as a 'critical election'? A critical election is one, which has significant implications for the long-term party order as well as long lasting realignments in the electorate. In order to assess whether the 1997 election was critical I must initially look to the criteria for an election to be considered critical. I then intend on commentating on the main parties fortunes in the run up to the election and since, followed by a brief comparison to the 1979 general election that is viewed as critical. Along the way I hope to explain how the 1997 general election in my opinion fit's the criteria of a critical election using numerous different sources. The first of the three features, which make an election critical, is a change in the social basis of party allegiance. Secondly is a change in the ideological basis of party competition and lastly a change in the partisan loyalties of the electorate1. In the run up to the election in question the Labour party underwent a massive transformation by re-modelling the party with changes right down to it core. ...read more.


The Conservatives moved rapidly from being the natural party in power to a party out of touch with Britain and even itself. It was almost as if their own success was their downfall, after a record 18 years in power they no longer appeared to have a grasp pf what was required to form able and popular government. They failed to modernise and appeal to larger base of a changing electorate, the majority of their support came from voters aged over 65. The party was also plagued by the media for reports of 'sleaze' in the party. In particularly Neil Hamilton and the 'cash for questions scandal'3, asking questions in Parliament for cash handouts wasn't what the party needed at a time when they're honesty and integrity was being bought into question. This was yet another example of Major losing his grip on party activity. Even though they won the 1992 general election the Conservatives began losing the support of the electorate and never looked like recovering. This loss in support of the electorate following the win in 1992 was largely down to despite promises not to raise taxes they did so twice. In the 1992 Tory election campaign the party attacked Labour for their intentions to raise taxes. This raising of taxes resulted in the party's honesty coming under fire, and furthermore seriously the loss of two by-elections. So the wheels were in motion for the Conservatives to slip up prior to the 1997 election, the party were in a state of disarray they seemed to be on a downward spiral. ...read more.


Labour also experienced problems with economy and they suffered 'The winter of discontent', problems they had great difficulty dealing with also very much like the Major government. The Conservatives fought their election campaign by successfully changing the party order to New Rightism, a fresh ideal for the electorate, as was New Labour's approach. Another similarity can be found in that of both times the winning party's were led by charismatic and powerful leaders, Margaret Thatcher in the case of the Tory's in 1979 and Tony Blair for New Labour in 1997. Lastly the two main factors in both elections were the winning party's gained the middle ground of the electorate and to their favour experienced a change in the partisan loyalties of the electorate. After considering the effects of the election on the three main parties' and considering the criteria for what makes an election critical. With the comparison of the 1979 election I must conclude that in my opinion the 1997 general election was indeed critical due to it long term effects on the fortunes of the three parties' and the way in which the partisan loyalties of the electorate were not only questioned but changed with long lasting effect. Considering Britain current political climate I would expect Labour to remain in power for many years to come, whether under Tony Blair's leadership is questionable. 1 Lecture 5: Voting Behaviour 2 New Labour Triumphs: Britain at the polls; Anthony King 3 http://www.newsint-archive.co.uk/pages/main.asp 4 The political landscape in the UK today ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How far do you agree that the role of the Trade Unions was the ...

    In October 74 a second election was held giving Labour a 42-seat majority. However this would a difficult time for Labour with the oil price rise of 73 Labour needed another loan. They went to the International Monetary Fund and got a �4 billion loan with an agreement to cut public spending which they did by �1 billion by 79.

  2. Why did Labour lose the 1951 General Election?

    Instead, this 1947 balance of payments crisis - compounded by the fuel shortage and the convertibility clause - forced Labour to rein in spending. As he struggled to justify his November emergency budget tightening spending and committing to an exchange rate policy subservient to US demands, Dalton resigned as Chancellor.

  1. Citizenship - participating in society

    I wanted to find useful and valuable websites and create a PowerPoint presentation and I think that I did not let my group down. I worked hard and when you work hard you produce the goods and that is what I did.

  2. Nationalism as applied to business

    who settle far from home but maintain ties with their homeland; inhabitants remain nationals of their home state but are not literally under the home state's system of government * a group of animals of the same type living together * one of the 13 British colonies that formed the

  1. Compare and Contrast how the Conservative and Labour 1997 manifestos use rhetorical language to ...

    The Labour Party use a first person narrative voice in their manifesto, "I...". The way in which The Labour Party overcome their problem is by using a religious semantic field: "Ten specific commitments are put before you"; "They are our covenant with you".

  2. Compare and contrast how the Conservative and Labour 1997 manifestos use layout features and ...

    with fact makes the manifesto seem to be full of objective truth. The Conservative manifesto is written in the 3rd person narrative to make the manifesto seem objective and not subjective. They use language to evoke fear of negative change "The nation state is under threat."

  1. Explain why the 1997 general election is a good example of a dealignment election. ...

    The election also seemed to have involved a huge amount of tactical voting and as a result produced a much higher percentage of the vote for Labour and the Liberal Democrats.

  2. Did the Labour Party show that it could govern Britain competently in the years ...

    MacDonald also helped to give the "League of Nations" a new prestige by speaking at its assembly in Geneva. The first Labour Government appeared to be very competent when it came to foreign policy. However, there was one foreign policy issue that threatened to undermine the good work of the government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work