• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the Article 23 be passed and can we trust the government to keep their word?

Extracts from this document...


Should the Article 23 be passed and can we trust the government to keep their word? In most democratic governments there are laws protecting national security while the people still have their freedom. I'm not against having a National Security Law but against how Article 23 is written, there are a lot of gray areas. There are 7 parts to this law, Treason, Secession, Subversion, Sedition, Theft of State Secrets, Foreign Political Organizations and Organizations endangering National Security. All but 3 are fine, sedition, theft of state secrets and organizations endangering national security. They aren't specific enough. Sedition refers to inciting others to commit treason, Subversion or secession, or inciting others to engage in violent public disorder that would seriously endanger the stability of the PRC. This is what the government has drafted for sedition. This is all right but they don't explain what 'inciting' is enough. ...read more.


But the newspaper company didn't know that it was a state secret. The government should give us more details in what a state secret is. If not they could use this to their advantage and say that some information was a state secret at any time and arrest the person. Organizations' endangering national security is when the government has the power to proscribe an organizations endangering national security. The secretary of Security can exercise the power only under stipulated conditions. A local organization will not be automatically proscribed if it is a subordinate to a mainland organization prohibited by the central authorities by open decree. If a father commits a crime does the police have the right to arrest his son as well? This would mean any local organization, which had ties to a banned mainland organization would be banned too. ...read more.


A few yours ago the court ruled that anyone living in China who had a parent born in Hong Kong could live there too. But the government of Hong Kong didn't want an influx of Chinese immigrants so they interpreted the law in a different way and said that they could live in Hong Kong only if both parents were born In Hong Kong. Regina Ip the former Secretary Of Security said the people of Hong Kong could trust the government and they wouldn't interpret it in a different way. But how can we trust them? Before the 2nd Gulf war the Bush administration kept telling us to trust them in that there were Weapons Of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Iraq. So far they have not found any yet. If we cant trust the Americans how can we trust the Hong Kong government, which has less credibility? Wayne Wong 11E 01/05/2007 English Persuasive Writing Coursework Article 23 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays


    It was Because Yitzhak Rabin was murdered in 1995. The Arabs knew that the Jews were all behind it. "The Palestinian Authority has repeatedly violated all aspects of the agreement" (http://www.science.co.il/Arab-Israeli-conflict.asp#Oslo) this means that all the agreement listed in the contract were violated and dishonoured by the Arabs and they wanted revenge.

  2. Free essay

    Why keep the Cons. in the 1960s

    The health of the economy was claimed to be the work of Butler, who served as Chancellor of the Exchequer between 1951 and 1955.

  1. Politics is a very emotive word and is used by different people to mean ...

    It is a history of battles concerning education, information and censorship as well as the social order. The most fundamental attempt to analyse the phenomenon of the public sphere/discourse both structurally and historically was undertaken by Ross Mckibbin's in His article " The destruction of the public sphere'.

  2. How do the writers attempt to influence the reader and why do you think ...

    The writer boosts up the leaflet with a persuasive story of 1988, a story of murders in a very dramatic way. The writer uses four years old data to persuade the audience to do something to save Brazil's Amazonian Forests and the Indians living there.

  1. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    They consequently advocated the emancipation of the serfs but only if this were accompanied by the retention of the peasant commune. Slavophil opinion was harnessed by Alex II behind emancipation statute of 1861. Enthusiastically received by Slavophils. 1861+ Slavophils more definitely aligned with conservatism.

  2. Decentralization and development of modern local government systems in Eastern Europe

    In countries involved in the European Union preaccession process the role of the intermediary level of government-regionalization-is a crucial issue (as in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland). The legal and administrative structure of large capital cities is also an important component of the planned reforms, as in these relatively

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work