• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the Article 23 be passed and can we trust the government to keep their word?

Extracts from this document...


Should the Article 23 be passed and can we trust the government to keep their word? In most democratic governments there are laws protecting national security while the people still have their freedom. I'm not against having a National Security Law but against how Article 23 is written, there are a lot of gray areas. There are 7 parts to this law, Treason, Secession, Subversion, Sedition, Theft of State Secrets, Foreign Political Organizations and Organizations endangering National Security. All but 3 are fine, sedition, theft of state secrets and organizations endangering national security. They aren't specific enough. Sedition refers to inciting others to commit treason, Subversion or secession, or inciting others to engage in violent public disorder that would seriously endanger the stability of the PRC. This is what the government has drafted for sedition. This is all right but they don't explain what 'inciting' is enough. ...read more.


But the newspaper company didn't know that it was a state secret. The government should give us more details in what a state secret is. If not they could use this to their advantage and say that some information was a state secret at any time and arrest the person. Organizations' endangering national security is when the government has the power to proscribe an organizations endangering national security. The secretary of Security can exercise the power only under stipulated conditions. A local organization will not be automatically proscribed if it is a subordinate to a mainland organization prohibited by the central authorities by open decree. If a father commits a crime does the police have the right to arrest his son as well? This would mean any local organization, which had ties to a banned mainland organization would be banned too. ...read more.


A few yours ago the court ruled that anyone living in China who had a parent born in Hong Kong could live there too. But the government of Hong Kong didn't want an influx of Chinese immigrants so they interpreted the law in a different way and said that they could live in Hong Kong only if both parents were born In Hong Kong. Regina Ip the former Secretary Of Security said the people of Hong Kong could trust the government and they wouldn't interpret it in a different way. But how can we trust them? Before the 2nd Gulf war the Bush administration kept telling us to trust them in that there were Weapons Of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Iraq. So far they have not found any yet. If we cant trust the Americans how can we trust the Hong Kong government, which has less credibility? Wayne Wong 11E 01/05/2007 English Persuasive Writing Coursework Article 23 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How do the writers attempt to influence the reader and why do you think ...

    mahogany and the writer emotionally plays with reader's hearts readers by involving them and with his/hers excellent use of emotive language. The writer draws reader's attention with the words like, 'look (line102)' and 'listen (104)' followed by exclamation marks and metaphors.

  2. Free essay

    Why keep the Cons. in the 1960s

    In the 1959 general election, Conservatives had gained 321 seats, with 48% of the public vote. While Labour had gained, 48.8% of the vote while only gaining 295 seats. Due to the 'first past the post electorate system'. The policies in this respect of consensus were improving housing, maintaining full employment, continuing on with the welfare state.

  1. Politics is a very emotive word and is used by different people to mean ...

    It is a history of battles concerning education, information and censorship as well as the social order. The most fundamental attempt to analyse the phenomenon of the public sphere/discourse both structurally and historically was undertaken by Ross Mckibbin's in His article " The destruction of the public sphere'.

  2. Serfdom – Emancipation, etc

    However, the hesitations of Alex & Nick do demonstrate the extent to which the autocracy had lost its revolutionary vigour. Alex's most important measure was the Law of Free Agriculturalists (1803). This enabled landlords to free their serfs, either as individuals or by whole villages, on condition that the peasants were given some land and not reduced to mere labourers.

  1. Decentralization and development of modern local government systems in Eastern Europe

    of the transition in lieu of national campaigns led by privatization agencies. The success of this process is debatable; the social consequences, which will be addressed later, have been very high in some countries. Another facet of the privatization process was a devolution of formerly state assets to local government ownership.


    This statement shows that even if Palestine owns the area of West Bank, they were still forbidden to come in their own area to pick up some wounded person. So what's the point of having doctors if they weren't allowed to treat people?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work