• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the UK reform its system for General Elections?

Extracts from this document...


Should the UK reform its system for General Elections? For centuries Britain has used and adapted the First Past The Post (FPTP) Electoral system. It has been developed through a growing country that is reflected in the unwritten constitution. FPTP is arranged whereby the country is split into constituencies, and any candidate (as long as he/she pays a �500 deposit) may stand to be elected. The candidate with the largest share of votes wins the seat, is elected to Parliament and becomes an MP. The MP has the right to go to every Parliament session and vote on legislation for the four or five year term. The candidate usually stands under a party name. This means when an MP under a party name gets a seat, that party gets a seat. The party with the majority of seats then gains power and becomes the Government. This is called the General Election. The Government is drawn from Parliament and chosen by the PM, they run the country until the next General Election in four of five years time, at the Government's discretion. This system is often called undemocratic and indirect so by analysing its weaknesses and the possible alternatives, it will be possible to determine whether it is desirable to reform the voting system. ...read more.


N.B. It can be argued that as the electorate votes in the MPs, who in turn vote in the PM, who in turn chooses his cabinet, they are being indirectly represented. The concept of indirect representation shows that power is being taken away from the electorate. As the sole purpose of the General Election is put the government in power that is chosen democratically by the people, FPTP fails to do so in directly democratic manner. This highlights the need for a new electoral system where choice is given, and that choice is honoured directly, so that the system is democratic. The final, and most commonly stated reason for electoral reform, is the bias and disproportionate ratio of votes: seats. Due to the fact that only a majority vote is needed, when three candidates stand, only 34% of the votes is needed. This means that over 60% of the constituency did not vote for the winning candidate. This in-turn means that a party can have well below 50% of the votes, and still gain power. Where marginals and safe seats are concerned, it defies the statement that in a democracy each vote has the same value and importance. ...read more.


The strong MP relationship means that the Executive has communication links with the electorate all over the country, helping the democratic process. The FPTP system also offers a political battleground where ideas can be deliberated. This competition allows the parties to offer the manifesto that will best help the people, and therefore, it is better for the citizens, who get the most helpful and reasonable policies implemented. The simple system has been used for centuries and it is easy to understand. The British public is used to it, and generally accepts the system. There are many critics of the FPTP electoral system used in the UK. There will always be criticisms of the fact that it does not deliver a very democratically elected Government. The reluctance for new countries to take on the system shows its reputation for indirect democracy and often apathy. It could be argues that what the UK needs is a change of its whole political system to a presidential system, possibly encouraging political participation and democracy. However any change is unlikely in the near future as Labour are prospering with huge majorities in the House of Commons. Therefore there is no need for them to change the electoral system even slightly. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. What is the purpose of elections and do they guarantee a democracy?

    General strikes and mass demonstrations brought down Berlisconi, and Major's government is infamous for its divisions and fragilityiii. Similarly, the German governments, both West and Unified, have had coalition governments for decades but it is hard to imagine a more stable government and societyiv.

  2. Minority parties in Britain call for electoral reform whereas the two major parties tend ...

    Within a PR system, there are far fewer wasted votes, a fact that would serve to encourage greater participation, as 'safe' seats would be likely to disappear and voters would see that their vote contributed to the government of the country.

  1. "Recent general election results have shown the need for electoral reform." Discuss.

    The party can claim a mandate to the people to carry out the manifesto if they win the election. The idea of a mandate is a 'constitutional fiction' as no party since 1935 have got more than 50% in an election so the party can not claim a mandate to, for example Labour in 1997, 1 in 4 people.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    Worth mentioning is that before the Crimean war, the British had already started to invest in the construction sector. In 1847 and 1848 it had built a naval hospital at the mouth of the harbour and a dock respectively. In 1849 it had also built some fortifications namely the Retrenchment of St.

  1. Electoral Reform

    legislation like the poll tax can be pushed through parliament even though it is unpopular with the public. Those against electoral reform would argue that if PR was used it would produce unstable coalition governments again without a mandate to govern due to them being coalitions.

  2. The Uk policy making process.

    uncontroversial, such as agreeing not to sit for the day after a very senior politician like a former Prime Minister has died. One way in which parliamentary consideration of legislation can be obstructed is known as the filibuster. Here, a Member tries to occupy so much parliamentary time simply by

  1. Compare and contrast the purpose of elections in the political systems of Britain and ...

    Post' system usually brings about a swift change of government or the reinstitution of the incumbent government. In both the US and the UK the main elections i.e. the elections for the presidency and the general election are not the only elections to take place.

  2. Consider the arguments for and against retaining first-past-the-post for general elections

    The majority of seats come from 'safe' constituencies in which the incumbent party will almost never lose. The result of elections is decided by approximately 100 'marginal' constituencies where the result is more unpredictable. Voters in these 'safe' constituencies are denied an effective choice.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work