• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the UK reform its system for General Elections?

Extracts from this document...


Should the UK reform its system for General Elections? For centuries Britain has used and adapted the First Past The Post (FPTP) Electoral system. It has been developed through a growing country that is reflected in the unwritten constitution. FPTP is arranged whereby the country is split into constituencies, and any candidate (as long as he/she pays a �500 deposit) may stand to be elected. The candidate with the largest share of votes wins the seat, is elected to Parliament and becomes an MP. The MP has the right to go to every Parliament session and vote on legislation for the four or five year term. The candidate usually stands under a party name. This means when an MP under a party name gets a seat, that party gets a seat. The party with the majority of seats then gains power and becomes the Government. This is called the General Election. The Government is drawn from Parliament and chosen by the PM, they run the country until the next General Election in four of five years time, at the Government's discretion. This system is often called undemocratic and indirect so by analysing its weaknesses and the possible alternatives, it will be possible to determine whether it is desirable to reform the voting system. ...read more.


N.B. It can be argued that as the electorate votes in the MPs, who in turn vote in the PM, who in turn chooses his cabinet, they are being indirectly represented. The concept of indirect representation shows that power is being taken away from the electorate. As the sole purpose of the General Election is put the government in power that is chosen democratically by the people, FPTP fails to do so in directly democratic manner. This highlights the need for a new electoral system where choice is given, and that choice is honoured directly, so that the system is democratic. The final, and most commonly stated reason for electoral reform, is the bias and disproportionate ratio of votes: seats. Due to the fact that only a majority vote is needed, when three candidates stand, only 34% of the votes is needed. This means that over 60% of the constituency did not vote for the winning candidate. This in-turn means that a party can have well below 50% of the votes, and still gain power. Where marginals and safe seats are concerned, it defies the statement that in a democracy each vote has the same value and importance. ...read more.


The strong MP relationship means that the Executive has communication links with the electorate all over the country, helping the democratic process. The FPTP system also offers a political battleground where ideas can be deliberated. This competition allows the parties to offer the manifesto that will best help the people, and therefore, it is better for the citizens, who get the most helpful and reasonable policies implemented. The simple system has been used for centuries and it is easy to understand. The British public is used to it, and generally accepts the system. There are many critics of the FPTP electoral system used in the UK. There will always be criticisms of the fact that it does not deliver a very democratically elected Government. The reluctance for new countries to take on the system shows its reputation for indirect democracy and often apathy. It could be argues that what the UK needs is a change of its whole political system to a presidential system, possibly encouraging political participation and democracy. However any change is unlikely in the near future as Labour are prospering with huge majorities in the House of Commons. Therefore there is no need for them to change the electoral system even slightly. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Minority parties in Britain call for electoral reform whereas the two major parties tend ...

    that is so prevalent in the current system which would result in government by consensus and greater continuity of policies. Although less prevalent in the 1997 election, a PR system would eliminate the potential for the 'North- South divide' that characterised the 1983 and 1987 elections.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    Finally the franchise was widened although it was still based on money qualifications, were the citizen had to possess Lm6 per annum in rent or property. Italian Refugees in Malta In 1821 after that the revolts in Italy had started, in Malta we experienced the first lot of refugees who came to shelter themselves.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Moreover measures of affirmative action within party recruitment processes can be implemented more easily in systems with party lists. [DIAGRAM 4 ABOUT HERE] In this regard it is difficult to compare the representation of ethnic or religious minorities, which depend in part upon the spatial distribution of these groups, but we can contrast the representation of women across systems.

  2. Consider the arguments for and against retaining first-past-the-post for general elections

    Presently, first-past-the-post is heavily biased against the Conservative Party. Labour won 65% of parliamentary seats from only 44% of the vote. The way votes are distributed nationally means that even if the Labour and Conservative Parties achieved an equal percentage of the vote, Labour would still hold a 79 seat majority.

  1. Assess the factors that determine the outcome of US Presidential elections

    Some now describe the media as 'the fourth branch of government'. Managing the media involves ensuring the right people get the right information. Today, television has taken over campaigning, but the purpose still remains, to encourage the electorate to support the personality and policy platform on polling day.

  2. Do Elections guarantee Democracy?

    The current FPTP system is insufficiently representative as it undermines the basic concept of human rights. The main objective of a representative government is to ensure that al sections of society have a say in the formation and conduct of the current government.

  1. Politics and Power notes on the UK system

    MPs in the House of Commons By-election When a commons seat becomes vacant, eg through a death or retirement of a sitting MP MP in the House of Commons European election Every five years MEPs- Member of the European Parliament Local elections eg county council Every four years Local Councillors

  2. Who would you vote for?

    Take the NHS for example. In all my experience it has provided excellent service. All this scandalising and constant criticism does nothing but devalue the profession of millions of hard working doctors and nurses. To be blunt, this is one issue on which the other parties also seem incapable of coming up with a feasible solution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work