• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Some have noted the weak role of Dail Eireann within the Irish political system. Is this a solid conclusion or an outdated generalisation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 3: Some have noted the weak role of Dail Eireann within the Irish political system. Is this a solid conclusion or an outdated generalisation? The D�il's role, and the role of those who operate in it, is a question of interest to anyone studying, or living within, the Irish political system. To understand the role of the D�il within Irish politics, the question of how it regulates and how it is regulated needs to be examined. The performance of the D�il can be assessed by examining its role in the appointment of governments, policy making and scrutiny of government behaviour (Gallagher 2004 p213). The constitution says that the D�il nominates the Taoiseach and approves the composition of government (ibid. p214). But while the constitution says that the D�il has the power, this is slightly misleading. Because of the party politics system, where it is in the interests of those involved to vote along party lines, the party (or coalition) with the most seats nominates the Taoiseach and approves the composition of government. It is usually when no coalition or majority government emerges that the D�il plays a key role in the appointment of government. This has happened six times since 1948 (ibid. p215). It could be argued that the potential power of the D�il is more effective than its actual power. ...read more.

Middle

Parliamentary questions are similarly limited in their impact, by the guidelines within which these questions must work. Answers as well as questions must be put down in advance-four days for oral and three days for written questions. This contributes to the ritualistic nature of the parliamentary sessions (Gallagher 2004 p227). The form that the answers take could hardly be described as an example of the D�il exerting its muscle. According to Gallagher (ibid. p228) the highly politicised nature of question time leads to ministers giving as little away as possible in their answers. "The culture is one of concealment, not openness." The Freedom of Information Act 1997 has proved to be a far more powerful investigative instrument than a parliamentary question (Connolly 2004 p348). Committees represent the most effective way in which the D�il scrutinises and impacts on government policy. During the committee stage (stage three of five) of the process for passing bills through the D�il, the opposition can give their opinions on the bill in the hope that the government will consider their proposed amendments. However, the eleven member committees are weighted 6-5 in favour of the government (Gallagher 2004 p231). There is obvious room for improvement in the committee system. Shaw (1979 cited in Gallagher 2004) ...read more.

Conclusion

While the D�il will never be strong, it is adequate. And while it is weak, it is simplistic to dismiss it as so. And for many, the feeling that we are ruled democratically is more important than having a particularly strong parliament (Norton cited in Gallagher 2004). Reference List: *Connolly, E. 2005. The government and the governmental system IN: J. Coakley and M. Gallagher (eds.) Politics in the Republic of Ireland. Great Britain: Routledge. pp. 328-352. Connolly, E. and O'Halpin, E.1999. Parliaments and Pressure Groups: The Irish Experience of Change IN: Norton (ed) Parliaments and Pressure Groups in Western Europe. Great Britain. pp. 124-145. *Gallagher, M. 2005. Parliament IN: J. Coakley and M. Gallagher (eds.) Politics in the Republic of Ireland. Great Britain: Routledge. pp. 211-241. *Murphy, G. 2005. Interest groups in the policy-making process IN: J. Coakley and M. Gallagher (eds.) Politics in the Republic of Ireland. Great Britain: Routledge. pp. 352-384. Norton, P 1990b. 'Conclusion: Legislatures in perspective' in P. Norton (ed.) Parliaments in Western Europe IN Parliament. Great Britain: Routledge. pp. 211-241. Shaw, M. 1979. 'Conclusion' in J. Lees and M. Shaw (eds.) Committees in Legislatures: a Comparative Analysis IN Parliament. Great Britain: Routledge. pp. 211-241. *Please note that no exact dates for when each chapter was written were given in the book Politics in the Republic of Ireland, even though the book has been republished four times. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    Ireland being altogether beyond the power of man, the cure had been applied by the direct stroke of an all-wise providence in a manner as unexpected and as unthought of as it is likely to be effectual." It is difficult to see how there could be effective relief to the

  2. "The British Parliament is weak whereas the US Congress is powerful." Discuss.

    along the same lines, whereas in the United States, the constitution operates so that the President and Congress can coexist but without conformity.13 In the UK ministers are accountable to Parliament and must maintain its confidence. In the US the president does not need the confidence of Congress and the

  1. What is Politics

    The unequal distribution of power in society, the model suggests, is not necessarily in the best interests of the majority of people. Rather, it benefits a ruling elite. Classical elite theorists argue that all states are governed by an elite or conflicting elites and that the majority of the population is basically passive and uninterested in politics.

  2. "Critically evaluate the relationship between Members of Parliament, political parties and pressure groups in ...

    First Reading in the House of Commons (public bills) On the day of the presentation a dummy copy of the bill is placed on the table. When it has been presented it is allocated a particular number that is shown on the bottom left hand corner.

  1. In comparison to Germany's relative political stability, what variables can be identified in order ...

    Power lies decisively with the Prime Minister on both occasions with the President limited in terms of his influence. The office is manifest in either system as described below. The 1948 constitution of Italy established a bicameral parliament (Parlamento), consisting of a Chamber of Deputies (Camera dei Deputati)

  2. Conflict Analysis: Angola

    For example it was reported that during the latter half of 1997 the government was increasing the amount of arms it bought18. Furthermore the government was giving military support to help rebel movement in Zaire under Laurent Kabila, leading to the overthrow of the pro-UNITA president Kinshasha and the establishment of the DRC.

  1. America has a two-party political system.

    His financial program was intended to allow the new nation state to develop and unite by removing the economic obstacles, mainly the debts it had incurred throughout the war of independence, and to unite the states politically6 by establishing federal economic success.

  2. Make note of the stability of the present two political party system

    We don't have a multiparty system. Until we do, nobody's going to cover these candidates. (Rosenstone et al., p. 35) In agreement with Perry, Marshall Field, publisher of the Chicago Sun Times, said, "The country is run by a two-party system and those candidates 'chosen by the people' are the ones who deserve serious consideration" (Rosenstone et al., p.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work