• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The 1906 General Election saw a convincing Liberal landslide of 399 Liberal seats to the Conservatives' 156.

Extracts from this document...


The 1906 General Election saw a convincing Liberal landslide of 399 Liberal seats to the Conservatives' 156. This was a stunning victory for a party that had, during the previous twenty years, only experienced three years of government; a party that had split over several issues, including Home Rule and the Boer War; and a party that had found trying to adopt a united and purposeful line very difficult indeed. With this victory came the end of Conservative dominance, and the beginning of a new era which saw the abandonment of laissez-faire and the introduction of enlightened social reform. This election result was all the more surprising in that it followed a previous election in 1900 where there had been a Conservative landslide, with 402 Tory seats to the Liberals' 183. For there to be two consecutive landslide elections is rare, but for these landslides to be awarded to one party in the first, and to the opposite party in the second, with the total number of seats held by each side literally swapping between the two parties is almost unique. It is therefore important to ascertain what caused this apparent electoral U-turn. The twenty years leading up to the 1906 election had been years of Conservative dominance. Strongly united behind the three Cs for which the party campaigned (Crown, Church, and Constitution), the Tories had dominated government, holding power for some seventeen years of the 1886-1906 period. General Elections in 1886, 1895 and 1900 all saw Conservative returns which gave the Tories a majority of at least 150 seats over their Liberal opponents. ...read more.


The Conservatives did try to deal with the problems raised by the Boer War. However, the reforms they introduced upset key sections of British society, adding to the general bad feeling felt towards the Conservative government. Key sections of society were upset by the varied reforms. The Military Reform Act, for example, was considered as achieving too little too late, and was seen more as an admission of guilt on the part of the government for their previous incompetence. It in no way appeased the loss experienced by the families of the 22,000 dead British soldiers. The non-conformists were upset by two Tory reforms. The Education Act upset them as it saw Church schools receiving assistance from rates. Given that non-conformists would not send their children to Anglican schools, this use of part of their rates was highly upsetting. 70,000 ratepayers were prosecuted for non-payment of rates, many of whom were disgruntled non-conformists who refused to pay their rates on a matter of principle. Such anger stirred the non-conformist voters who had remained dormant in the 1900 election (an apathy felt at the overwhelming inevitability of a Tory success) into action. The Sevenoaks by-election of September 1902 witnessed such action and demonstrated how powerful motivated non-conformists could be at the polls. A Conservative strong-hold, the Tory majority was cut from 5,000 to 1,000 votes in the by-election. Non-conformists were also angered by the Licensing Act of 1904, because they felt that in only closing supernumerary pubs the act did not go far enough. Non-conformists wished to see all pubs closed down. ...read more.


Furthermore the Liberals actively worked to promote their anti-Tariff Reform line. Asquith adopted a successful 'Big Loaf, Little Loaf' campaign to attack Tariff Reform which proved remarkably effective in attracting votes. In the 1906 election the Liberals promoted themselves as the 'Free Fooders' and attacked the Tories as 'Dear Fooders'. The consequence was that the election saw an 8% rise in turnout, whilst in the result there was a definite swing towards the Liberals. The Liberal's anti-Tariff Reform campaign attracted the votes of former abstainers and new voters, and, in key Conservative strong-holds particularly in London, Lancashire, Yorkshire and North-East England, former Tory voters who defected to the Liberals in opposition to Tariff Reform. That the election was held over two weeks may have helped magnify the swing towards the Liberals as early Conservative losses may have influenced those voters whose constituency's contest came in the latter half of the election period. According to Churchill, the Tories lost the 1906 election due to their exhaustion. However, this 'Exhausted Inheritance' theory is clearly not the case. The reform brought through by the Tories between 1902 and 1905 is clear evidence that the Tories were not exhausted. Rather they split over Tariff Reform. At the same time, their policies were proving increasingly unpopular with the electorate. This split, and their increasing alienation from the public inspired a re-united Liberal Party which was able to promote itself as the Free Fooders. Dormant Liberal voters, new voters and alienated Tory voters moved towards the Liberal Party. The result of the election saw the re-emergence of a re-united Liberal Party that could viably (and successfully) compete with the Tory Party. As a consequence the Tory dominance of the previous twenty years, a combination of Tory strength and Liberal weakness, was ended. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "Conservative Dominance in British Politics Between 1885 and 1905 Was Due to Conservatives Strengths ...

    However there are a considerable number of other factors in explaining why the conservatives were so dominant. For example, the weaknesses of the Liberal party. The Liberal split of 1886, due to the Home Rule crisis, created the Liberal Unionist party, which supported the Conservatives throughout the period of 1886

  2. "The first World War killed the Liberal Party" how far do you agree with ...

    He also suggested that the reforms the Liberals implemented were not satisfactory and people were unhappy with them and demanded more reforms. These ideas all suggest that the public were beginning to turn away from the Liberal Party who "were too rooted in the nineteenth century to survive these challenges".

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    Anyone who hid a sick person was severely punished and a reward was given to those who gave information about sick people. Stronger measures in Valletta were preached, as it was divided into districts and also had the organisation of volunteer groups to watch secretly on others.

  2. 'Conservative dominance in British Politics between 1885and 1902 was due to conservative strengths rather ...

    However, many argue that Goschen left the Liberals because they were weak. This is untrue, and it was due to Salisbury's political awareness and the third Reform Bill, which Goschen opposed, which brought the Unionists and Conservatives together. Unionists also brought direct financial backing for the Conservatives.

  1. Account for the overwhelming Liberal Landslide in the 1906 General Election.

    It can be seen and has been noted by psephologists that the Liberal victories were marginal in many seats and the biggest swings against the Unionists came in Unionist heartlands, and this was enough to change the MP in many constituencies.

  2. How far was the First World War responsible for the growth of the Labour ...

    broad enough to appeal to all groups which in turn led to growth. World War One had inspired the creation of the 1918 constitution and Sidney Webb programme as Labour leader Arthur Henderson had resigned from government in 1917 and instead concentrated on the constitution.

  1. Why Did the Liberals Experience a Constitutional Crisis in the Period 1909-1911? How Successful ...

    In these circumstances, so most Unionists felt, they could only back up Ulster's resistance. The relentless passion with which the Unionists opposed Home Rule owed something to the fact that they hoped thereby to erase the humiliation suffered over the Lords' veto and to avoid a fourth successive general election

  2. Free essay

    Consider the view that the liberal government reforms 1906-1914 were more concerned with the ...

    Labour party, not the liberals was considerably watered down when finally passed. The labour party requested that school children were guaranteed to be fed school meals provided by their local authority. The final act passed did not completely meet the needs of the labour party as all it managed to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work