• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The American Two Party System

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Since the establishment of the American government, partisanship, with few exceptions has been the rule. On a few rare occasions, the American government congealed into a single party system, yet every time, the nation would return to its two party status. Why did this occur despite the warnings of many of the greatest men of the time? Why is it that what has consistently been portrayed as a unified front, is now divided into a multiple part system? The two party system, has often been a hindrance to American progression, but it has also been one of the greatest tools of the American government to prevent the formation of an American monarchy. The idea of a two party system is elementary. However, the process of its evolution was much more difficult. The bi-party system created a new set of checks and balances - or as Richard Hofstadter referred to it, "a harmonious system of mutual frustration"- which prevented a concentration of power in one group, additionally, it shifted the power from the elite to the commoner (Hofstadter 9). Despite the desire to keep the fledgling nation of America united in purpose as much as possible, it was only natural that the politicians of late 1700s early 1800s would divide into separate groups. It is rare to be able to find a room of one hundred or more people who will agree unconditionally with one another, especially in matters of state. ...read more.

Middle

Its name, borrowed from the English, referred to the King's closest advisors who would meet in small rooms known at the time as cabinets (Garraty 120). The new cabinet was composed of Washington's most trusted advisors, friends, and patriots, all of whom were political children of the Revolution, and many of them eventually attained the presidency. Members of the cabinet included Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, James Monroe, Patrick Henry, John Adams, then the vice president, and Thomas Jefferson, as well as others (Brogan 213). Tensions ran high in the cabinet as Jefferson, father of the Democratic-Republicans, and Hamilton, a fervent leader of the Federalists, spared over many matters of state, from the relatively inconsequential, to Hamilton's economic policy. Eventually Jefferson resigned from his post in frustration. (The American Pageant The Young Reader's Guide to United States History 120, The Penguin History of the United States 213). In 1796, when George Washington announced that he would not seek a third term as president, a bitter political battle ensued (Bailey 193). The presidential election of the same year was to be fought between the two major political titans of the age, John Adams, a federalist from Massachusetts and Thomas Jefferson, father of the Democratic-Republicans, and a Virginia native. The campaign revolved around political stances, personality, and regional allegiances. In the end, Adams just barely defeated Jefferson in the Electoral College by the narrow margin of 71 votes for Adams to 68 votes for Jefferson (Bailey 194). ...read more.

Conclusion

Despite being a supporter of the French Revolution, an event synonymous with blood and decapitation, Jefferson actually preferred the smart, forward thinking, and peaceful solution to problems. He cut taxes, paid off the debt, and more than doubled the territory of the United States, all this he did peacefully (Gonick 117). This was not, however, to say that he would hesitate to use force, as he had with the Barbary Pirates in the first few years of the 1800s (Malone 132). The American people loved their new president despite his failed attempts at an embargo, and his own hypocrisy. As a result, the Federalists, overcome by internal strife, corruption, the loss of its leader - Hamilton had been killed in a duel with the once vice-president, Aaron Burr - and its failure to listen to the wants of the American people, finally crumbled, thereby handing the power over to common people (Gonick 116). (The Cartoon History of the United States 116-117, The Penguin History of the United States 255, Thomas Jefferson and His World 132). Although the Federalist party had broken down and the Democratic-Republicans were the dominant political party by 1808, by 1824, with the election of Jackson to power, the American populous had once again come to see the wisdom of a two party system. Conceptually, a two party system may seem to be divisive and an impediment to the democratic process. In reality, the idea of a multi-party organization is crucial to the democratic process. It not only allows for numerous points of view to be represented in government, it is fundamental to the system of checks and balances. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Has Spain’s system of Autonomous Communities created more problems than it has solved?

    And, Polls show that about three-quarters of Spaniards believe Basque terrorism to be Spain's biggest problem13. Even in the Basque Country the latest election results show that only 200,000 out of 3 million voters voted for HB (Herri Batasuna) the political wing of the terrorist organization, ETA.

  2. To what extent has Germany's party system evolved from a multi-party system to a ...

    The outlines for the West German political system were not set up by the German people they were imposed by the allies. Post WW2 many people in Germany were depoliticised, they feared political involvement and activity, believing that it could get them into trouble.

  1. In Charles Akers's Abigail Adams: An American Woman, this unique first lady gives us ...

    Adams shared the same political views as her husband and said, "I have a good opinion of my politics, since they agree with a Man who always thinks so justly".(Akers, pg. 146) Adams devotion to her husband can be seen from the way she treats other political figures that dares to challenge her husband.

  2. COMBATING CORRUPTION IN BANGLADESH: SOME STRATEGIES

    e From 1 to 2, will improve the corruption index bye the order of 2 point on the Transparency International (T.I) index. By acknowledging the existence of more indirect effects, the impact might be even larger, yet the authors are very careful in addressing the problem of causality corrupt countries

  1. Philosophical Foundations of the American Political System

    The Federalists, led by George Washington believed in a strong central government and supported the new writing of the Constitution. George Washington was a leader and advocate of the state's ratification process. He knew that to have the support needed he would need each and every state to support the Constitution's principles.

  2. Why is corruption so prominent in the contemporary Latin American political scene?

    modernising polity, the weaker and less accepted the political parties, the greater the likelihood of corruption." (8) Venezuela's two main established political parties are in a mess, Peru's long-dominant parties have lost ground to an amalgam of independent parties and in Argentina, the Peronist party which has dominated the country

  1. The Federalist.

    Numbers 37-51 contain explanations of the republican principles underlying the document, and 52-66 are an analysis of the legislative power of the regulation of elections (Kesler 60-65) The remaining essays, written by Hamilton, contain the analysis of executive (67-77) and judicial branches (78-83)

  2. A House Divided.

    Neither group of people were able to overrule the interests of the other class. Religious toleration was also granted to some Northern colonies. For example, in New York, the Duke's Laws guaranteed religious freedom and created local governments. The Northern colonies seemed to grant the settlers more freedom on important political issues than in the Southern colonies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work