The changing role and state of women in Britain since 1900.

Authors Avatar

The women between 1900 and 1914 had a tough battle. They had many methods however most of them were not very successful. A huge factor was their failure to unite under a common cause. Up until 1896 there had been no national organisation and there had been many regional divisions. The two biggest divisions being London (conventional) and Manchester (extremist). They had many disputes over stance on general feminist issues. These included…

  1. Concentrate on franchise alone
  2. Change all aspects of social and political issues.

Many women were appalled at the introduction of the CDA’s (contagious diseases acts) These allowed police to drag women in off the streets and check to see if they were carrying sexually transmitted diseases that could be passed on to sailors in the Royal Navy. In 1910 radical feminists declared a ‘sex war’ against all men. These extremists believed (wrongly) that all men were against women’s rights and should be harassed at all opportunities.

There was a dispute over weather the sufferage groups should affiliate with specific parties and if so which? There was a huge dispute over tactics in the NUWSS, which resulted in a split and the formation of the WSPU. The WSPU's motto was Deeds not Words. All this made it easy for politicians to ‘Divide and conquer’.

The legal and constitutional methods did not work in the short term. However it was vital for long-term work as it laid the foundations for later reform (it would have been impossible for change in 1918 without it.). However these methods weren’t forceful enough to get change before 1914. The women in the NUWSS were heavily reliant on Private Members Bills to get their argument heard in parliament. They were used repeatedly used from 1832 onwards and relied on having passionate individual supporters e.g. Liberal Backbenchers. These tactics however relied on having the support of the Prime minister as well. However many Prime ministers completely blocked those bills calling it treachery against the party and questioned the faith of the member who brought it up. The Liberal government kept promising to address women’s sufferage. However the NUWSS kept stopping all campaigns while talks were going on giving the government breathing space. They also had a lack of other options and forced the NUWSS against the wall. They did huge propaganda work producing

Join now!
  • Newspapers e.g. ‘The Common Cause’
  • Pamphlets
  • Speeches
  • Discussion groups
  • Meetings
  • Petitions

All these were necessary and gradually turned peoples minds but were terrible for short-term action. This forced the NUWSS into gradually changing tactics. This resulted in new tings like the Mud March.

There was also a failure with militant methods. The main militant group was the WSPU. It was founded in 1903 after a split between the conceptualists and the militarists. Emmeline Pankhurst led it along with her two daughters Sylvia and Christobel Pankhurst. The WSPU were seen as terrorists by the government and the government ...

This is a preview of the whole essay