• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Colonisation of Africa was Inevitable in the Late Nineteenth Century" Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


"The Colonisation of Africa was Inevitable in the Late Nineteenth Century" Discuss Witold Kozlowski 6EN This essay will set out to judge, whether or not the colonisation of Africa in the late nineteenth century was indeed inevitable. This will be judged on the basis of various economic, political, military and socio-cultural interests, which could, at that time, only be fulfilled in Africa. The fulfillment of these interests, through colonisation in Africa will not be regarded as inevitable, if their fulfillment could have taken place elsewhere. In the late nineteenth century Africa was only beginning to be the focus of Europeans, which up till then were solely preoccupied with acquiring colonies elsewhere (mainly Asia and North America). Africa was largely unknown, uncharted territory (with the exception of a few coastlines), and thus was regarded as the 'dark continent'. Yet, the growing desire for new scientific discoveries pushed explorers to un-shroud the only left, mystery continent. Little by little, individual explorers, such as Mungo Park, J.H. Speak and David Livingstone, not only brought back scientific facts, but what is more important, revealed the potential advantages of the colonisation of Africa; for it begun to present itself as a continent rich in natural resources, with little technologically advanced peoples, and moreover, free of colonisers, and was thus just waiting to be easily conquered and exploited. ...read more.


The colonisation of Africa was inevitable, not only because of economic reasons, but political ones, as well. Up to around 1870-80s the only uncontested nation in terms of world hegemony was Great Britain, which was solely interested in the expansion of its colonies, leaving continental Europe embroiled and focused on its own affairs. However, with the unification of Italy in 1861, largely due to Cavour and the unification of Germany in 1871 by Bismarck, territorial issues, which kept continental Europe uninterested in colonies, were resolved. Since then, the nation-wide German conscience (although with Bismarck's great reluctance), the empire-aspirant Italians and the isolated and humiliated French (during the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871 losing Alsace and Loraine) had put the acquiring of colonies as one of their top priorities. Owning colonies, at that time, was viewed as an ideal embodiment of a country's greatness and political power. Hence, in order to be counted with, on the world's political stage, a nation had to possess colonies (the perfect example being the small country of Belgium and Leopold II's Congo colony). Africa, being the only continent still untouched and undivided amongst European Colonial Powers, therefore presented itself as an obvious and single place adequate for the fulfillment of these interests of raising national prestige. By possessing colonies in Africa, the Germans, Italians and the French, with their boosted morals, could finally feel as 'great' and proud amongst other nations, and diminish (and thus evade social unrest) ...read more.


There was also the question of population emigration. France was resettling the ex-inhabitants of the German-occupied Alsace and Loraine to Algeria, in an attempt to stabilise this North African part of France. Great Britain, on the other hand, was rewarding retired soldiers with South African land. Nevertheless, this colonisation through emigration had an affect on certain coastal areas only, and would not have taken place if colonies had not been established before, and thus cannot be regarded as an inevitable colonisation process. A vital factor, which enabled the rapid colonisation of Africa, in the first place, was technological advancement of the late nineteenth century. Industrialisation brought about rapid advancements in transportation and communication, especially in the forms of steam navigation, railroads, and telegraphs. Medical advances were also key, especially medicines for tropical diseases. The development of malaria treatment enabled vast expanses of the tropics to be penetrated. Due to these advancements, European interests had finally been "let loose" onto Africa for fulfillment. In the result of all the factors mentioned and already discussed above (economic, political, military and socio-cultural) the colonisation of Africa was inevitable. Over the period of the last twenty years of the nineteenth century, virtually the whole of Africa had been colonised. In contrast to the Americas, Asia and Australia, Africa had been dominated by a larger number of Colonial Powers: Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, Portugal, and Spain. This reflected the new political and economic situation in Europe itself in the late nineteenth century. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    John in Malta amounted 332, where more than half of them supported Napoleon and were considered traitors. On 19th May 1798, the French fleet left Toulon, and Napoleon had full support of the Directory to attack and take Malta. On 9th June 1798 the French fleet was sighted from Malta, during the evening.

  2. The colonial factor in the Nigerian civil war (1967-1970)

    protectorate of Southern Nigeria, which had existed separately, were amalgamated to become the colony and protectorate of southern Nigeria. Even then, the northern and the southern administration were separate and distinct. Both were independent of one another and each was directly responsible to the colonial office.

  1. Nationalism Was More Important As A Product Rather Than A Cause Of National Unification ...

    of foreign goods in the commercial market, and foreign workers in industry. The finger was even pointed at the government and the Jews, accused of threatening the 'patrimonie' of the state, especially by the extreme left wing, Bonapartists, Republicans and Socialists.

  2. Nationalism in relation to France and Germany.

    This feeling of pride towards Germany as a nation was part of the romantism movement. People had an attitude and state of mind that focused on the individual, creative and emotional. The Romantic Movement played a significant role in intellectual life, influencing the country s nationalist fever.

  1. Which major domestic and international factors made German unification possible?

    The GDR were being left to there own devices and they were not good enough to deal with the problems of the 'revolution' occurring. This was certainly the case when Mittag took over from Honecker and many would say that his inability to cope paralysed the GDR government at a critical time in September.

  2. Assess the Extent to which the Different Powers Prepared 'Their' African Colonies for Independence.

    Again we see the desire for the French to maintain some autonomy in its colonies. Most African leaders did realise the force of this argument except Sekou Toure and the people of Guinea, so in turn de Gaulle ceased all assistance to prove his point.

  1. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    intercessory prayers to the Father, and the Eucharist where the Son is commemorated and experienced. According to the above hypothesis, one religious tradition like Christianity can be practised in fundamentally different ways when adapted to different groups in society, with their particular needs and circumstances.

  2. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    The Government of India has always put pressure on Pakistani regimes through statements and the international community. But even in Musharraf's regime the problem of Kashmir remained unresolved. Indian has always been blaming Pakistan of supporting the different militant groups working to disrupt the law & order situation in Kashmir.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work