• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Conservative party ruled Britain from1886 until 1905, however they lost the 1906 elections.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Conservative party ruled Britain from 1886 until 1905, however they lost the 1906 elections. This was not due to the change in the electorate, or because the conservative party suddenly changed their policies, but due to a number of factors that combined made the people of Britain look for a new way out and a different rule of Britain. The elections in 1906 followed the resignation of the Prime Minister; Arthur Balfour and the Conservative party in 1906. Balfour had realised that him and his government were becoming unpopular, due to the results of by-elections and thought that if the Liberal party ruled Britain for a while, the people would realise that they were better off with the Conservative party. He took a gamble and lost, as in 1906 the Liberals won the election with a landslide victory. Different historians have different ideas and view on why the Liberal's won the 1906 elections, one these views is because Chamberlain wanted to destroy the foundation of the Victorian economic policy and abandon the idea of free trade. This was a 'radical bombshell' to the majority of the people in Britain and as a result of this policy, Chamberlain resigned from the government in order to concentrate fully on this campaign. ...read more.

Middle

However this alone is not what causes many Historians to think that Balfour was a bad choice for Prime Ministers, other factors, such as his education act, the Taff Vale judgement and the issue of Chinese slavery also contributes to this. In 1902 Balfour introduced the education act, which allowed voluntary school, which were usually religious schools such as Church of England to be funded by local taxes. It abolished school boards and introduced Local Council Education Committees that were to run schools instead. The problem with this, was that the non-conformists, found the idea that religious schools could be run out of the taxes that they paid offensive. Non-conformists always objected to special privileges of the Church of England. This was supported by the Liberal party, which created more support for the Conservatives opposition. During the Boer war, the Taff Vale railway company in South Wales refused to grant wage increases to its workers despite the increased profit due to the war. It was asked for theses wage increases by the ASRS trade union, however the Taff Vale Company refused to recognise their right to bargain for a pay rise and the union called a strike. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although all these issues were key to the downfall of the Conservative party, I think that it was 'the Boer war (1899-1902) proved to be the catalyst for change' (Lee 1994). The Boer war caused many of the issues that combined made the Conservatives loose the 1906 election. If it wasn't for the Boer war, the 'Taff Vale' incident would never have happened as there would not have been the demand for the increase in the railway industry that made the ASRS want a wage increase for it's members. It also would not have resulted in a shortage of workers in South Africa, causing the 'Chinese Slavery' incident, or the after-effects of the Boer War, such as the Liberal Part re-grouping would not have happened. Finally, Chamberlain's ideas of 'Tariff Reforms,' only came into play because of the sense of unity he thought that the British Empire should contain to be strong. If the Boer war had not happened, the emotional bonds fostered by it would not have been there to convince Chamberlain that the opportunity to strengthen links within the Empire were there to be seized. 'THE CONSERVATIVES LOST THE 1906 ELECTION BECAUSE CHAMBERLAIN SPLIT THE PARTY OVER THE TARIFF REFORM.' HOW FAR DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS POINT OF VIEW? Nadirah Kaba ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "The first World War killed the Liberal Party" how far do you agree with ...

    Lloyd-George began talking to with Bonar Law and eventually forced Asquith to resign with the support of the general public who could read of his incompetence in The Times. Lloyd-George went on to become Prime Minister but with the conservatives serving under him and all the Liberals left the government with Asquith and refused to serve under Lloyd-George.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    One can say that the Maltese enjoyed the majority, however one cannot forget the fact that the 5 Maltese officials were all pro-English, and hence did every thing in favour of the governor, that in certain cases of equal votes his vote was crucial.

  1. How far do you agree that the role of the Trade Unions was the ...

    Martin Pugh, Modern British History. It is important to realise what the Liberal failing were as well as what exactly is meant by the strength on Labour. The Liberal Party splitting created a opening for Labour especially since it didn't recover until the 30's, military conscription during the war was

  2. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    whole of Namibian society, provided a base from which a resistance culture could be fostered. They could publicise to the world the grievances of their oppressed congregations as well as assisting and protecting their congregations. The CCN performed numerous activities of support for the oppressed.

  1. Liberal success in 1906 owed more to conservative failure than liberal organization, To what ...

    Their approach was that of a Laissez Faire which means to do nothing and let them get on with it themselves. They both were great believers of "Self Help" and were not prepared to make the country responsible for these problems.

  2. The Rise and fall of the Ottoman Empire.

    be reached through anthology of cases and rules already included in the Shari'ah. This method of juridical thinking was only accepted by the most liberal school of Shari'ah, Hanifism so it is no surprise that this dominated Ottoman law. The Ottomans though elevated kanun into an entirely separate code of laws.

  1. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    to obtain a temporary respite in the military campaign that was not going according to her liking, and once its military forces were firmly established in the region, it saw little need to continue a serious debate over the Kashmir issue at the UN.

  2. To what extents can the events of 1905 in Russia be considered a revolution.

    Nihilists were expelled from the universities. Soon Nihilism lost its influence in Russia. Before it died out, Nihilism as a philosophical and literary movement emancipated many of the educated young men from any allegiance to the established order. (ii) Populism: Nihilism was individual rather than social in character.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work