• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16

The constitutional change in the House of Lords

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In the general election in 1997, the Labour party made commitments in relation to several areas such as constitutional, law and order, welfare, education and health, environment and economy. Among these, a major part of Labour's election manifesto was the constitutional change in the House of Lords. The Labour party manifesto states that "The House of Lords must be reformed. As an initial, self-contained reform, not dependent on further reform in the future, the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords will be ended by statute. This will be the first stage in a process of reform to make the House of Lords more democratic and representative." A political scientist, John Kingdom had opined that the House of Lords as "one of the most curious of the curious anomalies in British public life, defying all logic of democratic and secular politics." The constitutional reform pressure group, Charter 88, say the chamber enjoys little public support and makes a ridicule of representative democracy. Contrarily, the supporters of the historic system of House of Lords viewed that the Lords has long provided a less party-political counterbalance to the House of Commons. In my opinion, one of the reasons to reform the House of Lords is that the House of Lords always oppose the proposals of any government. For examples, the greatest number of Lords defeats suffered by any government was 126 inflicted on Labour during the 1975-76 sessions and the highest number inflicted on the previous Conservative administration was twenty-two defeats during the 1985-86 sessions. This would obstruct the administration and management of government. Besides, the present House of Lords suffers from a lack of legitimacy because of its anachronistic and unrepresentative composition. Thus, the Government is committed to improving the effectiveness and balance of the House of Lords, with the aim of it playing a full and proper part in Parliament. ...read more.

Middle

Besides, the vast majority of the public is against a second chamber, which dominated by appointees rather than directly elected representatives. This is because there would still have the problem of lack legitimacy without a direct election. However, in my opinion, the balance in composition could make the upper house become more representative and democracy and plays an effective role. Since the Commission would create an upper House which is 'authoritative, confident, and broadly representative of the whole of British society'. Its members would have experience, skill and knowledge relevant to the assessment of constitutional matters. In November 2001, the government published White Paper, The House of Lords - Completing the Reform. The White Paper it produced was basically along the lines with the visions of Wakeham Report. The Government will welcome responses to this White Paper by 31 January 2002. The White Paper stated that the new second chamber would act as constitutional checks and balances to the House of Commons and retain its current power. It would have no veto over government legislation but has the power to delay government legislation for three months. However, the functions of the reformed must also be renewed whilst maintain the higher status in the legislative process. In order to balance the power of the Executive, the second chamber should have the power of delay for one year. Therefore, the government still has time to reconsider about the effect of the enactment of such legislation or redress the defects or inadequate in that Bill. The Government proposes only one change to the formal powers of the House of Lords in relation to Secondary legislation. At present, the House of Lords only has the power to approve or reject a Statutory Instrument. This crude power is inconsistent with the Lords' primary role as an advisory and revising chamber. Therefore it accepts the Royal Commission's recommendation that the House of Lords should be given a power to require the Commons to consider or reconsider Statutory Instruments. ...read more.

Conclusion

They should be appointed by the head of state, the monarch, and the monarch should be advised in this by an independent group of advisors, subject to scrutiny. Only a fully democratic body will provide the accountability the public rightly demand. However, an elected upper House may fight against the flaws of democracy. This cannot work if the upper house is elected as well as the lower. Additionally, the United States of America, where the upper house is elected, it showed that most of the people who get elected are the sons of former members of that same house, and near enough all of them are stinking rich, consequently the upper House may be biased. Therefore, the reform of House of Lords is too wide ranging and affected and related to many essential parts like House of Commons, role, power and function of upper House and others, the government must do it properly and efficiency, to achieve 'centre of grativity' around which a consensus may be built. REFERENCE LIST Barnett, H. (2000) Constitutional and Administration Law (Third Edition), Great Britain: Cavendish Publishing Limited. pp 670-675 A Department for Constitutional Affairs Consultation PaperConstitutional Reform: Reforming the Office of the Lord Chancellor September 2003 http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/lcoffice/index.htm#part5 A Modern House of Lords http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/area/uk/man/lab97.htm Britain to Abolish Lord Chancellor Post by Reuters, London http://nation.ittefaq.com/artman/exec/view.cgi/4/2465 Foreword by Lord Falconer of Thoroton Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Lord Chancellor http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/holref/index.htm#part4 Foreword by the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Lord Chancellor http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/holref/holresp.htm History http://www.fact-index.com/h/ho/house_of_lords.html#History House of Lords http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199798/ldbrief/ldreform.htm House of Lords Act 1999 http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1999/19990034.htm House of Lords Act 1999 http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/en1999/1999en34.htm House of Lords Reform http://news.bbc.co.uk/vote2001/hi/english/main_issues/sections/facts/newsid_1214000/1214416.stm House of Lords Reform Promised http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1398438.stm Joint Committee on House of Lords Reform http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/joint_committee_on_house_of_lords_reform.cfm Labour Manifesto 1997 http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/labour_party.htm Labour's Reform of the House of Lords http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/jan1999/lord-j23.shtml Modernising the House of Lords http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm41/4183/ref-08.htm Peers Reject Bid to Abolish Lord Chancellor http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/13/ulords.xml&sSheet=/portal/2004/07/13/ixportaltop.html Peers Snub Commons by Refusing to Abolish Lord Chancellor's Office http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardianpolitics/story/0,3605,1260905,00.html Planned Reforms to the House of Lords http://w ww.historylearningsite.co.uk/Lords_reforms.htm The House of Lords Completing the Reform http://www.dca.gov.uk/constitution/holref/holreform.htm#part3 The Wakeham Report http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/wakeham_report.htm 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The advantages of the Uk having a constitutional monarchy are greater than the disadvantages. ...

    Meanwhile, monarchy takes part in many charitable activities. According to the report: 'The Queen and other members of the Royal Family have close associations with a wide range of charitable organisations covering many areas of national life. As patrons of over 3,200 charities, the Royal family visit a large number of charity organisations and projects each year.'ix It

  2. Parliamentary Supremacy - parliament as the supreme law-making body, consisting of the monarch, the ...

    must be discussed in the house of lords first and although the house of lords can ask for amendments to be made or even the act to be delayed from being passed for a maximum time of 12 months they cannot reject an act completely and after the 12 months

  1. The Sydney Opera House Story

    The winner was announced in January 1957, and construction stated in March 1959. It was originally envisaged that it would take four years to build and cost $7 million; in fact, it took 16 years to complete and cost over $100 million.

  2. For my creative piece I have written a short story set in the future, ...

    "Very funny, but seriously why have you dragged me to this place anyway?" "Step inside," he said.

  1. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    Negatively and conversely, the press also often inverts and becomes the mouthpiece of governing political parties and of large corporations in order to receive social, political, and monetary benefits. The use of the press and broadcasting stations as the organ of large corporations is currently a major concern in Turkey.

  2. Why Did the Liberals Experience a Constitutional Crisis in the Period 1909-1911? How Successful ...

    and Lloyd-George to manipulate his less politically minded son, George V, into creating one to two hundred new Liberal peers to sit in the Upper House unless they agreed to both the Peoples Budget and a reduction in their power of veto.

  1. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    are significant, with some parts even speaking the old language of Gaelic. Many feel that the Scottish has a stronger cultural affinity with Northern Ireland than with England. Even centuries ago, when forming the union of the United Kingdom, the Scots kept some distinguishing laws separate.

  2. The House of Commons

    to scrutinize the legislative functions of the government of the day, because of the fact that the government is likely to have an inbuilt majority's in each of the committees, the extent to which this is likely to be effective is compromised.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work