• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16

The constitutional change in the House of Lords

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In the general election in 1997, the Labour party made commitments in relation to several areas such as constitutional, law and order, welfare, education and health, environment and economy. Among these, a major part of Labour's election manifesto was the constitutional change in the House of Lords. The Labour party manifesto states that "The House of Lords must be reformed. As an initial, self-contained reform, not dependent on further reform in the future, the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords will be ended by statute. This will be the first stage in a process of reform to make the House of Lords more democratic and representative." A political scientist, John Kingdom had opined that the House of Lords as "one of the most curious of the curious anomalies in British public life, defying all logic of democratic and secular politics." The constitutional reform pressure group, Charter 88, say the chamber enjoys little public support and makes a ridicule of representative democracy. Contrarily, the supporters of the historic system of House of Lords viewed that the Lords has long provided a less party-political counterbalance to the House of Commons. In my opinion, one of the reasons to reform the House of Lords is that the House of Lords always oppose the proposals of any government. For examples, the greatest number of Lords defeats suffered by any government was 126 inflicted on Labour during the 1975-76 sessions and the highest number inflicted on the previous Conservative administration was twenty-two defeats during the 1985-86 sessions. This would obstruct the administration and management of government. Besides, the present House of Lords suffers from a lack of legitimacy because of its anachronistic and unrepresentative composition. Thus, the Government is committed to improving the effectiveness and balance of the House of Lords, with the aim of it playing a full and proper part in Parliament. ...read more.

Middle

Besides, the vast majority of the public is against a second chamber, which dominated by appointees rather than directly elected representatives. This is because there would still have the problem of lack legitimacy without a direct election. However, in my opinion, the balance in composition could make the upper house become more representative and democracy and plays an effective role. Since the Commission would create an upper House which is 'authoritative, confident, and broadly representative of the whole of British society'. Its members would have experience, skill and knowledge relevant to the assessment of constitutional matters. In November 2001, the government published White Paper, The House of Lords - Completing the Reform. The White Paper it produced was basically along the lines with the visions of Wakeham Report. The Government will welcome responses to this White Paper by 31 January 2002. The White Paper stated that the new second chamber would act as constitutional checks and balances to the House of Commons and retain its current power. It would have no veto over government legislation but has the power to delay government legislation for three months. However, the functions of the reformed must also be renewed whilst maintain the higher status in the legislative process. In order to balance the power of the Executive, the second chamber should have the power of delay for one year. Therefore, the government still has time to reconsider about the effect of the enactment of such legislation or redress the defects or inadequate in that Bill. The Government proposes only one change to the formal powers of the House of Lords in relation to Secondary legislation. At present, the House of Lords only has the power to approve or reject a Statutory Instrument. This crude power is inconsistent with the Lords' primary role as an advisory and revising chamber. Therefore it accepts the Royal Commission's recommendation that the House of Lords should be given a power to require the Commons to consider or reconsider Statutory Instruments. ...read more.

Conclusion

They should be appointed by the head of state, the monarch, and the monarch should be advised in this by an independent group of advisors, subject to scrutiny. Only a fully democratic body will provide the accountability the public rightly demand. However, an elected upper House may fight against the flaws of democracy. This cannot work if the upper house is elected as well as the lower. Additionally, the United States of America, where the upper house is elected, it showed that most of the people who get elected are the sons of former members of that same house, and near enough all of them are stinking rich, consequently the upper House may be biased. Therefore, the reform of House of Lords is too wide ranging and affected and related to many essential parts like House of Commons, role, power and function of upper House and others, the government must do it properly and efficiency, to achieve 'centre of grativity' around which a consensus may be built. REFERENCE LIST Barnett, H. (2000) Constitutional and Administration Law (Third Edition), Great Britain: Cavendish Publishing Limited. pp 670-675 A Department for Constitutional Affairs Consultation PaperConstitutional Reform: Reforming the Office of the Lord Chancellor September 2003 http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/lcoffice/index.htm#part5 A Modern House of Lords http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/area/uk/man/lab97.htm Britain to Abolish Lord Chancellor Post by Reuters, London http://nation.ittefaq.com/artman/exec/view.cgi/4/2465 Foreword by Lord Falconer of Thoroton Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Lord Chancellor http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/holref/index.htm#part4 Foreword by the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Lord Chancellor http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/holref/holresp.htm History http://www.fact-index.com/h/ho/house_of_lords.html#History House of Lords http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199798/ldbrief/ldreform.htm House of Lords Act 1999 http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1999/19990034.htm House of Lords Act 1999 http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/en1999/1999en34.htm House of Lords Reform http://news.bbc.co.uk/vote2001/hi/english/main_issues/sections/facts/newsid_1214000/1214416.stm House of Lords Reform Promised http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1398438.stm Joint Committee on House of Lords Reform http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/joint_committee_on_house_of_lords_reform.cfm Labour Manifesto 1997 http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/labour_party.htm Labour's Reform of the House of Lords http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/jan1999/lord-j23.shtml Modernising the House of Lords http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm41/4183/ref-08.htm Peers Reject Bid to Abolish Lord Chancellor http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/13/ulords.xml&sSheet=/portal/2004/07/13/ixportaltop.html Peers Snub Commons by Refusing to Abolish Lord Chancellor's Office http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardianpolitics/story/0,3605,1260905,00.html Planned Reforms to the House of Lords http://w ww.historylearningsite.co.uk/Lords_reforms.htm The House of Lords Completing the Reform http://www.dca.gov.uk/constitution/holref/holreform.htm#part3 The Wakeham Report http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/wakeham_report.htm 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. For my creative piece I have written a short story set in the future, ...

    I'm sorry to tell you but the real winners of the 2001 election were a certain Green Party. Thousands of students organised the biggest scam ever using their college grants and student loans to finally win the biggest protest yet.

  2. Distinguish between the different functions of the House of Lords and House of Commons

    The House of Commons need to grant approval of the government, if they do, then the House of Commons are granting the government the authority of the nation, indirectly. This strengthens and sustains the government, since it has approval of the people.

  1. The advantages of the Uk having a constitutional monarchy are greater than the disadvantages. ...

    The advantages In contrast, we cannot ignore that the existence of monarchy still has a considerable amount of advantages nowadays. Now, I will discuss them respectively. In the first place, the monarch is an impartial head of the state, so it provides a symbol of national unity and continuity.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    The laws could be proposed by a member of council, however the member couldn't make any money proposals. The important fact was that only the governor decided how money was to be spent. Worth mentioning the fact that the 1849 council was the result of the effort made by Camillo

  1. Consider the contribution of select committees to the House of Commons' scrutiny of government ...

    However one has to note that the ombudsman cannot have his recommendations put into effect by force of law. His jurisdiction extends only up to special reports laid before houses of parliament upon investigation of the injustice resulted. Everything is left to the doctrine of ministerial responsibility, the assumption being

  2. 'The government controls parliament but it cannot always rely on getting its own way.' ...

    This realignment has often led to major policy development decisions being made by senior civil servants, party committees, government advisors or ministers, without reference to the nation's official representatives in the House of Commons. The legislative aspect of parliament's role, and in particular that of the House of Commons, has

  1. Why Did the Liberals Experience a Constitutional Crisis in the Period 1909-1911? How Successful ...

    The People's Budget precipitated the constitutional crisis, which ended two years later in the 1911 Parliament Act, which curtailed the Lords' veto. How far it was deliberately contrived to provoke a clash with the Lords remains a matter of some controversy.

  2. Devolution is not a "constitutional settlement" but a dynamic (and potentially destabilising) process. ...

    The subject of nationalism has been ever present in Scotland, although they had to wait until 1999 to gain any control over their home affairs. Once finalised, the Scottish Parliament had 129 members, a Chief Minister who selects the Cabinet, tax raising powers, the right to make laws and the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work