• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia

Extracts from this document...


The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia Burmese nationalist movement Factors for the rise of Burmese nationalism Political 1. The British administration destroyed the old political system. The Konbaung dynasty was abolished and the Hlutdaw was removed. It removed the traditional headmen because they had led the resistance movement after 1885 and replaced them with salaried ones, like the myo-ok or the myothugyi. 2. It was convenient to adopt, wholesale, Indian administrative models that were not relevant to Burma. they had negative consequences. For example, the role of the headman, the economic and social institutions at the local level was completely reversed to conform to an Indian model In 1920, many villages were grouped together under a circle headman, thus reducing the number of village headmen. The new headmen failed to inspire the kind of trust and loyalty among the peasantry that the myothugyi had in the pre-British era as he was regarded as a paid British officer. Instead of acting as the highest official at the local level, the headman became under the British the lowest official of the central administration representing an even smaller administrative unit, the village. As a result, the role of headman providing leadership at the village level, degenerated. 3. The Burmese felt alienated because of the British distrust and policy of not associating the Burmese with the administration in significant numbers. Instead the British preferred Indians and minority groups especially the Karens many of whom were Christians. The educated Burman elite found the status of Burma as an Indian province (until its separation in 1937) offensive to their pride in Burma as an ancient kingdom with its own glorious traditions Economic disruption 1. British rule introduced many economic changes hardly any of which benefited the Burmese people. Large tracts of land were brought under rice cultivation and exports increased tremendously, but they benefited the Indian moneylenders and British companies involved in processing, shipping and exporting of the grain. ...read more.


5. In 1919, the Sarekat Islam was infiltrated by the Socialist elements or the Indies Socialist Democratic Club (ISDV - 1912 and founded by Hendrik Sneevliet) which made the Sarekat Islam a more politically active and militant party. In 1920, the ISDV leaders, Samuan and Tan Malaka tried unsuccessfully to gain control of the Trade Union Central which was a federation of 22 trade unions formed by Sarekat Islam. In 1921, Samaun formed a rival association of trade unions, the Revolutionary Trade Union Central and in the process was able to detach considerable strength from Sarekat Islam's Trade Union Central. 6. By 1920, Samaun and Tan Malaka insisted that the Sarekat Islam come out openly as a political party with a radical and revolutionary programme for the overthrow of Dutch rule and the establishment of a socialist state. In 1920, the Socialists broke away from the Sarekat Islam to form the Partai Kommunis Indonesia (PKI). In 1921, the Sarekat Islam passed the Surabaya Resolution which expelled the Socialists from the party. 7. In 1923, the Sarekat Islam changes its name to Partai Sarekat Islam (PSI) and in the same year it adopted non-cooperation tactics by not participation in the Volksraad. It became more interested in an active Islamic programme as it was influenced by the teachings of Mohd. Abduh from the University of Cairo (Islamic Reformist Movement). It held congresses and gained some support from the masses. 8. By 1927, PSI lost influence to Sukarno's Partai Nasional Indonesia (PNI) as by then the western educated elite found Islam to be an insufficient factor in the nationalist cause. The members drifted away to join other parties and this probably explains why the Dutch government did not apply any harsh measures in spite of its non-cooperative stand. 9. The ultimate significant feature of Sarekat Islam lies in its position as a training ground for a small group of Islamic leaders who would play an active role in the political arena where Islam was at a disadvantage. ...read more.


In 1937, the SMU formed branches in Malacca and Penang and Malay associations were also formed in other states. A Brotherhood of Pen Friends (Persaudaraan Sahabat Pena) was formed in 1937. It examined political affairs and especially the position of the Malays. In the same year, the Kesatuan Melayu Muda (Malay Youth Union) was organised. It was a radical party and it neither expressed loyalty to the sultans and the British nor spoke of non-cooperation but it worked to promote nationalist feelings and teachings among its members, whose strength lay in the lower classes. A Pan-Malayan Conference of Malay state associations met in Kuala Lumpur in August 1939 to attempt to unite Malay groups together in a single movement, but the effort failed. However, it laid the foundation for the formation of another political organisation, the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) formed in 1946. Chinese nationalism To the Chinese, the colonial administration provided the conditions and the opportunities for a large-scale economic development and thus they were not encouraged to dispute British authority. They had their objections against what they experienced as discrimination, against the Malay 'special rights' and against the Malay claims that Malaya was a Malay country, but as long as they were allowed to work in the economic field without interference, they hardly showed an interest in Malaya's political development and they did not consider their complaints a sufficiently strong motive to oppose the colonial regime. Indian nationalism Similar considerations conditioned the attitude of the Indians, who were, as a group, not important enough, numerically, to tip the scales and who were more interested in the political activities of the Indian National Congress' efforts to gain independence for India. Hence, democracy, popular representation and independence were hardly an issue in Malaya and if there happened to be a few intellectuals mostly Eurasians, sometimes, Chinese who diffidently brought up these matters for discussion, they did not meet with any response from among either the population in general or the leading personalities in public life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "The British Parliament is weak whereas the US Congress is powerful." Discuss.

    Introducing laws that are not scrutinised or debated by the British Parliament is in breach of the convention that says that Parliament is the supreme law making body of the UK. Furthermore, increasing globalisation means that there is a limit to what can be done, especially in the economic sphere.

  2. Compare and contrast the Chartist and Anti -Corn Law League movements. Explain and illustrate ...

    The two key leaders of the Chartist movement were William Lovett and Feargus O'Connor. Lovett and O'Connor did not see eye to eye on the methods that they thought the Chartists should use. Lovett preferred radical and non-violent methods, and emphasised the importance of education, whilst O'Connor believed in a more forceful approach.

  1. What impact did Mao have on the lives of the Chinese people from 1949 ...

    Although Mao was still leader of the Communist Party and enormously popular with the people, other leaders were running the country. They reorganised communes, making them smaller and handed back peasant ownership. Although Mao may have tried his hardest, the effects his changes had were mostly for the worst, which left China worse off than before he came to power.

  2. Party system in India

    They began to rely on populist measure and the relation between the ruling and the opposition party turned to be one of rivalry. The attempts by Gandhi to centralize power, agitations led by Jayaprakash Narayan, the imposition of Emergency in 1975-77 and finally the formation of the Janata party in 1977 brought far-reaching changes in the structure of party competition.

  1. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    success was due to the approach he took, which was that he didn't merely just implement the radical policies, but he made steady progress towards, which meant that he initially had to build a strong foundation for which he could secure his rule and then place policies as they were

  2. The colonial factor in the Nigerian civil war (1967-1970)

    This unfortunate yet obvious fact notwithstanding, the former colonial master had to keep the country one in order to effectively control his vital economic interests concentrated mainly in the more advanced and "politically reliable" south. Thus for administrative reasons, the Northern and southern parts of Nigeria was amalgamated in 1914.

  1. The failure of Chartism was due to improved economical conditions rather than the movement's ...

    Chartism was such an umbrella organisation that it was bound to arouse different views and ideas regarding its purpose. During the 1840s the divisions in leadership were visible. On one side there was William Lovett and Francis Place who believed strongly educating the lower classes would be essential in eventually achieving the 6point charter.

  2. Prospects for India's development

    II. Model and Variables In order to develop a model for India we analyzed the following variables: 1) Politics: Stability, the Party System, Coalitions and Consensus 2) Labor Policy and Education 3) Privatization and Liberalization of Key Industries 4)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work