• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Drug Policy in the United States

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Drug Policy in the United States is a very strict and well defined policy that, in this day and age, has very little room for change. Most people are well aware of the fact that there are a certain number of drugs that are illegal in the United States, but what many people do not realize is that every drug in the United States is considered and classified by the government. The Controlled Substance Act (CSA) is a new name for the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970. The laws haven't changed too much since 1970; they still have the same basic foundation. The only differences that have been made are amendments added to strengthen the original laws on these drugs that are in our country, and make them even stricter. Even though there are many laws that control drugs in the United States, the U.S. Drug Policy is one that is easy to follow and obey. It is well known that in order to stay in the clear an individual should stay clear of drugs altogether, unless they are prescribed by a physician. There is, of course, a basic structure to the way the government classifies all the different drugs underneath the Controlled Substance Act, "the CSA places all substances that are regulated under existing federal law into one of five schedules. ...read more.

Middle

Another main concern of those who support the drug policy in the U.S. is their fear that if these harmful drugs were not illegal, the country would be much worse off. They acknowledge the fact that "the affects of harmful drugs like cocaine and heroin, are much worse then those of alcohol and tobacco" (U.S. Drug). The supports argue the point that this country already has enough problems trying to control the use of alcohol and tobacco, and to let these even more harmful drugs be legal on the streets would be nothing short of madness. They believe that if we, as a country, are not able to control drinking and driving problems, as well as over usage of tobacco products causing cancer in the masses, there is no way we would be able to control the effects that stronger and more harmful drugs would have on the people of this country. A third aspect of the act that supporters stand by is the idea of increased enforcement. They believe that the stricter the laws and more they are enforced the better the results will be. Again supporters depend on the fear that people have of being caught and paying the consequences. The worse the consequences are for drug offenders, the less likely they are to break the laws. ...read more.

Conclusion

I have seen first hand the consequences that come with being involved in drugs after growing up in a small city very close to the border, Yuma, Arizona. I have seen one too many young teenagers and adults as well ruin their lives for drugs, and though I acknowledge the arguments of those who are opposed to the strict drug laws, I still believe that even if the drugs were legalized they would still be ruining lives. That fact is undeniable to me, and though alcohol and tobacco are harmful also, they don't impair the human mind the way that these stronger and more harmful drugs do. The human mind is impacted so strongly by drugs like cocaine, heroin, and marijuana and these drugs are so addicting that to legalize them would be, in my opinion, to throw away the great minds of this country by the masses. I agree with the supporters of the Controlled Substance Act, U.S. Drug Policy, and strict laws against drugs in the United States. I believe that the policy is more then worth while, it is essential. This is one form of government intervention that I believe is necessary. I think that we should, as a country, continue to look for new ways to strengthen and enforce these laws because keeping these drugs out of our country is very important and it will help us to stay a stronger, smarter, healthier, and more alert country as a whole. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The Uk policy making process.

    In particular, the guidance is careful to state: "DO NOT give the impression to a lobbyist that any particular advice, idea or information from their clients could or will be decisive in the decision-making process. Decisions are for Minister who will want to weigh up all the evidence and all the advice they receive before they judge the public interest."

  2. Free essay

    Anarchism (Basic Facts)

    Welfare Social Anarchist believe that there is supposed to be a "council" that will decide what is to be done with people's wealth. So from an anarchist point of view, they don't really believe in the welfare system we have now.

  1. 'Liberal pluralist views of policy making are hopelessly naïve.' Discuss.

    Pluralists argue that decisions are achieved by 'partisan mutual adjustment', which includes negotiation and bargaining between different interests and there is close linkage between small changes and mutual adjustment. However, because of the unequal distribution of power, policy-making may be incremental, but sometimes not involving mutual adjustment, it is dominated

  2. COMBATING CORRUPTION IN BANGLADESH: SOME STRATEGIES

    or for the benefit of a group to which one owes allegiance. It can be motivated by greed, by the desire to retain or increase one's power, or perversely enough, by the belief in a supposed greater good. United nation's Dictionary of social science define as " corruption in public

  1. Is Legalization a Realistic Alternative to the War on Marijuana?

    The consequences differ from state to state. In some states possession is merely a misdemeanor. However, in other states, no line is drawn between possession and distribution; they are both considered felonies. Babbit brings to attention one of the most dire consequences of marijuana usage by minors and young adults.

  2. Conservatism in the United States Revolution

    The document reflected his deeply opposition to turmoil. In 1774, with the passing of the Intolerable Acts, Americans formed the Continental Congress, in which Americans discussed for solutions, conservative solutions. This controversial events led Americans to unite and long for the old order that existed, hence, Conservative Americans.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work