• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The first World War killed the Liberal Party" how far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The first World War killed the Liberal Party" how far do you agree with this statement? After the end of World War One, the Liberal party was divided and support had dramatically decreased since the landslide election victory just little more than ten years previous. The party was destined to become a third party and has never formed its own government in Britain since to date. Sometime between the period of 1906 and the end of the war, something happened which lost the Liberal's their support. In this essay, the opinion that the First World War killed the party shall be examined. Liberal ideology is that which is very much against war. Traditionally Liberal Government would back away from military conflict in the favour of more peaceful methods to negotiate peace. Therefore, when in 1914 the Liberals under Prime Minister Asquith lead Britain into war on August 3rd 1914, Britain immediately responded with a degree of varied outrage as to the Liberal Party's foreign policy. While the general public seemed to respond with a large response of patriotism, many signing up for the army immediately, two Liberal MPs resigned in disgust. However, the reaction of support for the Liberal Party, in spite of these resignations, did not suggest early on in the war that they were destined to become a third party. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore, the difference in opinion began to make the party inefficient and also therefore weak. This weakness was highlighted to the general public in May 1915 when The Times published an article blaming the government for the shortage of shells on the Western Front. Asquith's inability to run a war smoothly was therefore questioned not only by MPs but also by the public (electorate), and many devout Liberals became disappointed and anxious about the competence of their leader. The lack of confidence in Asquith because of certain faults that revealed themselves during the war times perhaps helped to kill the Liberal Party and therefore, there is evidence that supports the statement that the First World War killed the Liberals. The incompetence of Asquith to run a war smoothly was a very important aspect that helped to kill the Liberals, even more so than DORA because DORA did not create two separate groups within the party with strong opposing views, just caused mere tension. If Asquith had been more competent in war, the public may have given the government more support because the war may have been more successful. Having considered this however, Asquith did manage to reverse his lack of public support by forming a coalition with the Conservatives and Labour. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was the biggest issue during the First World War because it actually resulted in the Liberals being ousted from power, having being in power for the last time ever. Asquith's failure to let compromise with Lloyd-George and Bonar Law resulted in him being removed from power, and this is the reason for the decline of the Liberals because once out of power, Asquith was susceptible to great criticism and he was unable to defend himself. To conclude, the feud between Asquith and Lloyd-George went on to destroy the Liberals, and this feud came about only because of the First World War. If the first World War had not come about then Asquith would never have been highlighted as a bad leader and a coalition or compromise of Liberalism would never have had to taken place. This would have meant public support would not have been lost. Therefore, because there was only a limited decrease in support for the Liberals before 1914, and by the end of 1918, they were irrepairably destroyed, gaining only 28 seats compared to Lloyd-George with the conservatives who gained 526 MPs, it can be concluded that the First World War killed the Liberal Party. ? Lloyd-George and a group of Liberal MPs believed they had no choice but to concentrate all efforts on winning the war, even if it meant acting 'illiberally'. They soon lost confidence in Asquith's leadership because of his inefficiency. 16:43 27/04/07 Ruth Naughton-Doe 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Kashmir Issue and Mediation.

    Sometime she favors Pakistan's stance on the Kashmir by saying that "Kashmir is territorial dispute between Pakistan and India that should be resolved under the Charter of UN".

  2. How far do you agree that the role of the Trade Unions was the ...

    self-loosing to the Conservatives, arguably with stronger TU support the Party may have found themselves keeping power. The 1950s saw a conservative dominated government period due to the failing of Labour in their last term in office. The strength of the Conservative governments and their handling of Britain's economic problems

  1. Free essay

    Women's contribution to the war

    Women must have being doing something right during 1939-45 for them to be granted this. They must have made a big enough impact between 1939-45 as all women today are permitted to join their own trade unions in their work.

  2. "By 1942, SEAsian Nationalism was largely a failure." How far do you agree with ...

    As for Thakins, there was rivalry among Burmese leaders. Freedom Bloc protested against U Pu and organized strikes in 1940 which saw the arrest of Ba Maw and the escape of Aung San. U Saw rose to power against Ba Maw's govt and repressed Thakins. Evaluation: Disunity within the ranks of various nationalist parties saw the fall of various

  1. Was the most important reason for the collapse of the coalition government in 1922 ...

    From this we can see that he does not have much care or respect for his public he just wants to keep the conservatives happy he seems a "prisoner of the conservatives."

  2. Parnell and the Irish Parliamentary Party 1882-5 After the Kilmainham ...

    Westminster - the most important of these were: - defence - foreign policy - international policy Irish MPs were to be excluded from Westminster.

  1. How significant was The First World War in the Labour Party's rise to second-party ...

    Furthermore at the 1924 election Macdonald manipulated the "Liberal-Conservative combination" as he called it, which "highlighted the inconsistency of the Liberals political stance."4 The Liberals failure to distance themselves from the Tory's at the 1924 election demonstrated not only that they were a party increasingly affiliated with the right, but

  2. How far was the First World War responsible for the growth of the Labour ...

    not fight each other but cooperate to improve the conditions for the working class. As a result, the fact that many members of the Labour Party did not actively campaign against the First World War, even though they had received vitriolic abuse, had helped to hold the Labour Party intact.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work