• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The House of Commons most important function is to participate in the law making process' Give arguments for and against this view

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

13th September 2005 Louise Collins 'The House of Commons most important function is to participate in the law making process' Give arguments for and against this view Parliament is described as the 'legislature'; this suggests its main role is to make laws. However, the legislative procedure process is a relatively small part of its functions. The House of Commons, in particular, plays a much wider role in the British political system than the term 'legislature' suggests. There are many different functions undertaken by the House of Commons. The House of Commons plays an important role in law making; they do not legislate, however, they can put forward bills to the House of Lords. Two circumstances apply to this: The first being a Private Members' Bill, this is when a bill is introduced by an individual MP and the second is a free vote, this is when MPs are allowed to make up their own minds without the interference of the whips but by no means is the House of Commons a law-maker in the true sense of the word. The House of Commons' most important function could, therefore, be law making; Private members' bills do allow for a few important legislatures, as singular MPs have been listened to. ...read more.

Middle

The House of Commons doesn't have to be a member of the government, so, the government don't have to sponsor the bill but they can't object to it being put forward. Most of the time the bill wouldn't get past without government support but publicity would beckon. However, Government legislation always takes priority over the legislation set about by in the House of Commons; it is seen that government issues are far more important than those in the House of Commons so if there isn't enough time for the government to introduce or debate these bills, then they are left. It is not the place of the House of Commons to make their own bills whilst they should be supporting the government with theirs. There are two primary roles of the House of Commons and they are to support the government and not make opposing views, for example, Tony Blair would have wanted support during the Iraqi war debate but instead the majority of Parliament voted against a war and to act as a monitor for the government. The House of Commons is there to monitor the government and check its policies and legislations, they are a role of security among parliament and if too little time is given to this role, then mistakes would be made by the government, possibly very important ones. ...read more.

Conclusion

The House of Commons makes the government accountable, the government have to answer to them in order for new actions and policies to be justified or left open to debate, and this is a security blanket for the government. Representation; the House of Commons has to represent the nation, and, as such, when an issue is debated the nation are indirectly involved, they uphold the rights of the nation. Redress of grievances gives individuals the chance to air their dissatisfaction at certain governing bodies, therefore, being an outlet for complaints and people to air their opinions, so the same mistakes won't be made in the future. Also, the influence of the House of Commons can help minority groups to have a fair say in many debates, many MP s are sponsored by these minority groups. In conclusion, I think that a collaboration of all the functions is more important than having just one main role in the House of Commons, they all add to the way parliament is run and keep the machine running. Each function has a separate purpose that helps in its own way, if one was taken as a priority then other functions would begin to fail, which would, more often than not, be needed in the successful running of parliament. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. For my creative piece I have written a short story set in the future, ...

    Here we are." He urgently whispered. "What's with all the secrecy?" I asked him. "You idiot! Don't leave your bottle of oil hanging out your pocket like that! This neighbourhood's so bad they ask you for your head size when you go to buy a pair of tights..."

  2. Distinguish between the different functions of the House of Lords and House of Commons

    Amending the bill simply means that it is sent back to the House of Commons for them to re-think it over because there is either a legal fault in the bill or a human rights issue to contend with. As there are nay legal minds in the House of Lords this makes the task of amending bills easier.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Arguments used in favour: * The strength of such systems are that they guarantee a high degree of party proportionality. If a party receives 32% of the vote, then it will get 32% of the seats in parliament. Every vote has the same value.

  2. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    The government proposal had suggested that the House should have a maximum of 600 members with the political balance adjusted to reflect share of the vote in the preceding general election and the final tally of 600 members would be fixed over ten years.

  1. Constitutional and administrative law.

    Another problem arises when one considers how executive power has been reorganised and redistributed and the line between governmental and private bodies has become blurred. Under the Ministers of the Crown Act (1975) the functions of any government department can be transferred to any other.

  2. UK Written Constitutionshould the legislative process in Parliament be designed to secure that 'unconstitutional' ...

    a popular assembly.'12 Whilst elected representatives in Parliament do give it a democratic basis, academics have illustrated that democracy has a broader definition. Elliot identified that because 'the principle of democracy forms a key part of the normative foundation upon which Parliament's legislative authority is based'13, Parliament must adhere to democratic values.

  1. The House of Commons

    Party loyalty is justified on the bases that almost all MP's are elected on party label, rather than on their own individual census. This loyalty is, due to the stringent system of party whipping and strong party loyalties apparent in the contemporary British political system, it is almost certain that

  2. Public Law

    He stated there should be three main, distinct and independent organs to any government-the legislature, the executive and the judiciary (rule-interpretation). In Britain, such a system ceases to exist. The three branches are present, but are inter-related rather than independent of one another.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work