• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The House of Commons most important function is to participate in the law making process' Give arguments for and against this view

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

13th September 2005 Louise Collins 'The House of Commons most important function is to participate in the law making process' Give arguments for and against this view Parliament is described as the 'legislature'; this suggests its main role is to make laws. However, the legislative procedure process is a relatively small part of its functions. The House of Commons, in particular, plays a much wider role in the British political system than the term 'legislature' suggests. There are many different functions undertaken by the House of Commons. The House of Commons plays an important role in law making; they do not legislate, however, they can put forward bills to the House of Lords. Two circumstances apply to this: The first being a Private Members' Bill, this is when a bill is introduced by an individual MP and the second is a free vote, this is when MPs are allowed to make up their own minds without the interference of the whips but by no means is the House of Commons a law-maker in the true sense of the word. The House of Commons' most important function could, therefore, be law making; Private members' bills do allow for a few important legislatures, as singular MPs have been listened to. ...read more.

Middle

The House of Commons doesn't have to be a member of the government, so, the government don't have to sponsor the bill but they can't object to it being put forward. Most of the time the bill wouldn't get past without government support but publicity would beckon. However, Government legislation always takes priority over the legislation set about by in the House of Commons; it is seen that government issues are far more important than those in the House of Commons so if there isn't enough time for the government to introduce or debate these bills, then they are left. It is not the place of the House of Commons to make their own bills whilst they should be supporting the government with theirs. There are two primary roles of the House of Commons and they are to support the government and not make opposing views, for example, Tony Blair would have wanted support during the Iraqi war debate but instead the majority of Parliament voted against a war and to act as a monitor for the government. The House of Commons is there to monitor the government and check its policies and legislations, they are a role of security among parliament and if too little time is given to this role, then mistakes would be made by the government, possibly very important ones. ...read more.

Conclusion

The House of Commons makes the government accountable, the government have to answer to them in order for new actions and policies to be justified or left open to debate, and this is a security blanket for the government. Representation; the House of Commons has to represent the nation, and, as such, when an issue is debated the nation are indirectly involved, they uphold the rights of the nation. Redress of grievances gives individuals the chance to air their dissatisfaction at certain governing bodies, therefore, being an outlet for complaints and people to air their opinions, so the same mistakes won't be made in the future. Also, the influence of the House of Commons can help minority groups to have a fair say in many debates, many MP s are sponsored by these minority groups. In conclusion, I think that a collaboration of all the functions is more important than having just one main role in the House of Commons, they all add to the way parliament is run and keep the machine running. Each function has a separate purpose that helps in its own way, if one was taken as a priority then other functions would begin to fail, which would, more often than not, be needed in the successful running of parliament. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. 'Liberal pluralist views of policy making are hopelessly naïve.' Discuss.

    As pluralists have a narrow conception of observable power, they cannot examine the mobilization of bias, through non-decision making, many issues that challenge the existing values and norms are excluded from the policy-making process. In reality, the power structure tends to be much more sophisticated than pluralists conceived.

  2. UK Written Constitutionshould the legislative process in Parliament be designed to secure that 'unconstitutional' ...

    It is only when this constitutionally democratic basis for legitimacy is recognised that the legislative process will be well and truly secured against the passing of 'unconstitutional' bills. The relatively recent development of constitutionally democratic principles has resulted in the idea that legislative sovereignty is dependant, not only on elected representatives, but also on Parliament adhering to constitutional principles.

  1. The House of Commons

    There are 3 main ways in which parliament holds the government to account one is select committees, official opposition, ministerial Question time is another important tool for scrutinizing government, and is a valuable source of information for Mps and the electorate.

  2. Distinguish between the different functions of the House of Lords and House of Commons

    Amending the bill simply means that it is sent back to the House of Commons for them to re-think it over because there is either a legal fault in the bill or a human rights issue to contend with. As there are nay legal minds in the House of Lords this makes the task of amending bills easier.

  1. Public Law

    It is a Cabinet government with parliamentary executive, in which the Law Lords act both as judges in judiciary and as legislators, furthermore, the Lord Chancellor is a member of all three branches-Minister in Executive, Head of Judiciary and member of the House of Lords in it's legislative capacity.

  2. Public Law

    This is illustrated in the case of Entick v Carrington4 where the rights of the individual were stated in a statute, deciding the outcome of the case. The HRA took part of this power away, as now our fundamental rights and freedoms are not set by Parliament.

  1. Constitutional and Administrative Law

    The development of the supremacy of Parliament stemmed from the English Civil War and has expanded ever since and is a dominant theme in British Politics. Those MP's who represent the public via representative democracy, have been handed the power to assess, pass or reject legislation.

  2. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    It should also ensure that at least 30 per cent of appointed members are women with the purpose of gender balance and with similar safeguards to ensure representation of ethnic minorities and appropriate representation for all religious faiths. The Commission recommended that the House would have fewer Church of England

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work