• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The leader now dictates all aspects of the Labour party." Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


"The leader now dictates all aspects of the Labour party." Discuss It is argued by many that the leader of the Labour party now has more control over the various aspects of Labour than ever before since the role of party leader was given to Blair. However in order to ascertain how true this theory is, all aspects of the current Labour party must come under close scrutiny. The Labour party conference used to be a means of passing policy (with party morale being the other main reason it was held.) However, the labour leader now plays a much bigger role in reviewing and assessing the policy being passed at the labour party conference. The modern Labour leader is actively involved in five of the main steps in policy making (as either a member of the N.E.C. or the J.P.C.) This means that the leader of the party has a great deal of controlling influence over any policy, which is being passed, whilst still creating the illusion of empowerment with the Labour membership. ...read more.


Bernie Eccleston.) However, The Unions do still control half of the total vote at conferences and sponsor some Labour MPs. They are a representation of Labours traditional voters and so the party must now disregard them. This may be why the labour party has recently used the Trade Unions in consultation matters, such as the FBU pay dispute and the new minimum wage. Although Blair does control some power over the Union aspect of the party, the Unions themselves do still have some individual influence and control. The membership aspect of the Labour party is an area where it is much harder to decide who has actually has control. Blair loses out to the party membership in one sense, as they are actively involved in policy making within the N.P.F. meaning that the leader cannot totally dominate that aspect of policy. However, the membership is uninformed and so can be (and are) completely exploited by Blair who used his wealth of Advisors, Informers and other specialists to gain the upper hand on the members. ...read more.


However, this does not mean that Blair is not accountable to the press, which is why he must control, the party so precisely at conference so as not to embarrass himself. In conclusion, 'Blairism' has led to a much stricter control over the varying aspects of the party by the Labour leader, which has, if election results are to be taken into account, been very successful for the party on a whole. However, this may have been at the expense of socialism in the UK. Blair's almost dictator like control over every aspect of the party is only counteracted by his more limited influence over the party membership, who he may be willing to follow. Blair currently sits with the biggest Labour rebellion in the history of his term in power hanging over his head, and Blair's decision on a war with Iraq may well make it clear to what extent Blair feels obliged to listen to his party members and to what extent Blair just does what he likes. 1 Nathan Griffin- Y12 Politics (Mr Ward) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. 'Liberal pluralist views of policy making are hopelessly naïve.' Discuss.

    Politics and Markets New York: Basic Books Martin J. Smith (1990) 'Pluralism, Reformed Pluralism and Neo-pluralism: the Role of Pressure Groups in Policy-Making' Political Studies, XXXXVIII, pp302 - 322 Manley J. F (1983) 'Neo-Pluralism: A Class Analysis of Pluralism Iand Pluralism ?', The American Political Science Review, 77, pp368-383 Richardson J.J & A.

  2. To what extent has the Labour party completely abandoned its' traditional Principles?

    the principal of public investment to improve the lives of the entire nation. Under the traditional labour party values, public spending and the welfare state were seen as important means in order to cater for every person of the British public.

  1. 'Personal and party advantages were the motivating forces for the passing of the 1867 ...

    in food prices, due to a bad harvest in the autumn and an outbreak of rinderpest among cattle the previous year. Consequently it was hardly surprising that a number of mass demonstrations were held in London shortly after the appointment of the Conservative government, when the failure of Russell's reform bill had heightened the excitement.

  2. Is New Labour a Conservative Party?

    The Labour government was dependent on a growing economy, but when this fell into decline cuts in public expenditure became inevitable. With the cuts came the end of the socialist advances, dependent as they were on the availability of resources.

  1. Why did Mussolini become leader of

    By 1922 fascism seemed to be taking over!! However when D'Annunzio began to highlight the failures of the provisional government by a series of dramatic events which occurred at the Adriatic port of Fiume. Italy had claimed the city but was not granted it and the weak Liberal government made no efforts to retrive it.

  2. With reference to material you have studied discuss the major policy differences between the ...

    They argue that while the IRA still posses a huge arsenal of weapons and the ever-present possibility of a return to violence, the Army should maintain a strong military presence, in order to insure the stability and protection of the unionist state and its people.

  1. The position of the New Labour government with Tony Blair ahead of that government.

    Conservatives, who won the general election in October 1951, could return to their previous ('interwar') policies, however, they accepted the post-war consensus, even if there were some minor modifications to the consensus. The reason to accept was that "Keynesian demand -management" policies and Beveridge's ideas about the welfare state, described

  2. Why were the 1930's a decade of disappointment for the labour party?

    However the 1931 crisis was too much of a strain on MacDonald and he was forced to abdicate his Labour leadership. This was devastating for the party as there was a lack of appropriate senior Labour ministers who could capably secure leadership.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work