• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Legislative acts as a check on the Executive - To what extent is this true today?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Emma Newman "The Legislative acts as a check on the Executive" To what extent is this true today? I am going to look at the main role of both the executive and the legislature. The above statement does not give a clear insight to what checks and balances are in place today. Policies have changed since parliament came into being and this essay will examine how and to what extent this statement is true. The executive is the administrative branch of the government; it makes laws through the means of delegated legislation and drafts bills. The legislature on the other hand enacts the law but the line between the two powers is somewhat blurred. The overlap of powers allows parliament to make any change it wishes by Act of Parliament and helps to ensure against arbitrary exercise of power. There is almost complete separation of powers in the USA where governmental intransigence in controversial matters is a much bigger problem than it is in the United Kingdom (here the judges can indulge in greater law making activities if necessary.). There is little executive - legislature separation in the UK but much legislature - executive/judiciary separation. The concept of the separation of powers was first discussed by two men after observing the British system; Charles Montesquieu and John Locke. John Locke wrote in his book 'Second treatise of Civil Government': "It may be to great a temptation to human frailty, apt to grasp at power, ...read more.

Middle

The executive generally executes the law. The executive consists of the prime minister and his cabinet (government ministers) and other civil service members. The executive's general role is to initiate legislation, maintain order, promote social and economic welfare, and keep in order the conduct of external relations of the state. The prime minister and his cabinet sit in the House of Commons along with other MP's. The prime minister runs the government, he is the leader of the party and it is him that selects the cabinet of ministers. The House of Commons and particularly the government are very powerful because they have been elected by the people; it has a mandate, which contrasts with the House of Lords. The House of Lords forms part of the legislature and is unelected. Members of the House of Lords are hereditary peers, life peers or bishops. Its main aim is to act as a check on the House of Commons although some people think that it is merely a talking shop. The house of lords is anachronistic and has little power because it is not elected and has no mandate. The House of Commons can however rule over the House of Lords. When a bill is being passed it has to go through the House of Lords before it is passed. If the House of Lords do not want to see this law passed and oppose it, then it goes back to the House of Commons to be debated again. ...read more.

Conclusion

Select committees further scrutinize the work of the executives main departments e.g. transport, education, agriculture etc. Fourteen committees are appointed for the life of a parliament and each committee has either nine or eleven members made up from back bench MP's. Each committee has a majority of members from the government side of the house. Select committees are free to investigate any part of the government's activities they wish as no governmental approval is needed. But for criticisms of the government to be made, it must be supported by on or more MP's from the government side of the house. Because legislative and executive powers are closely inter twined, and ministers are members of both powers, the two institutions are distinct from each other. The process of legislation is different from the day to day running that the executive carries out. The power of the executive has grown and checks are in place to prevent abuse of this power. The question is: are they strong enough? I believe and the evidence above backs me up that there are a wide extent of checks and balances but the executive still has an awful lot of power but the legislature has got its priorities right with starting to check on it. It is important for the legislature to keep checking on the executive so that control is maintained and it does not slip in to more of a dictatorship role. In conclusion therefore the legislature does act as a check on the executive but it also has other functions to carryout. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent does ministerial responsibility ensure accountability to the government?

    In practice these conventions have been much weakened. Cabinet divisions, especially under the Conservatives over Europe, the greater distancing of policy making from the full cabinet, and the increasing trend of political memoirs from former cabinet ministers revealing divisions has reduced the extent of collective responsibility a great deal.

  2. To what extent does executive dominance over parliament prevent M.P.'s from carrying out their ...

    Most of these problems are caused by the executive as they will not employ M.P.'s that are more experienced, therefore undermining their effectiveness. Voting on bills is largely controlled by the whip. M.P.'s have often been called lobby fodder as they simply vote on what they whip tells them.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Semi-Proportional Systems Semi-proportional systems provide another option, including the cumulative vote where citizens are given as many votes as representatives, and where votes can be cumulated on a single candidate (used in duel-member seats in 19th Century Britain and in the State of Illinois until 1980).

  2. Constitutional and Administrative Law

    * The Prime Minister is an active member of the legislative (and can vote in Parliament, though a recent criticism of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown is that their voting record is one of the poorest of MP's in the Commons)

  1. To what extent did Alexander II succeed in reforming Russian life and institutions?

    as most of the revolutionary groups grew in universities because it was there that the more liberal and literate people would meet. Russia was in a bad situation concerning its economy, because the rouble (Russian currency) was not stabilised. The main financial reforms made by Michael Reutern from 1862 to

  2. UK Written Constitutionshould the legislative process in Parliament be designed to secure that 'unconstitutional' ...

    was becoming outdated due to the growing importance of the party system.8 The nature of elections 'inevitably produces party groupings.'9 In order to appeal to an electorate, the party system was centralised resulting in the growth of executive power. Subsequently, an increasingly Schumpeterian system of democracy emerged where Parliament was dominated by the executive and party hierarchy.

  1. The constitutional change in the House of Lords

    It comprised by a majority of nominated members, who would be appointed by an independent Commission, and a minority of selected or elected members representing regional interests. Under the recommendation of Commission, the independent statutory Appointments Commission established in April 2000 to responsible for nominating all appointed members of the House including those from the political parties.

  2. Alexander, a True Liberator

    Criticism of his reforms was incessant in young upper and middle class Russia, who maintained that the changes to the status quo did not go far enough as to improve the peasant's standard of living, nor to allow Russia the right to express their political ideologies in government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work