• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Liberal election victory of 1906 was a result of division in the conservative party and nothing else - discussed

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The Liberal election victory of 1906 was a result of division in the conservative party and nothing else' The Liberals won a 'landslide' election victory in 1906. It is claimed that the loss of power for the Conservatives was largely due to a decline in fortunes as the party split due to issues over tariff reforms. On the other hand it is assumed that the loss was due to the complacency and the neglect of Workingmen's Interests. Arthur James Balfour had become the Conservative leader in the House of Commons and served (1891-92, 1895-1903) as the first Lord of the treasury. He had succeeded his uncle as Prime minister in 1902. A huge task lay ahead of Balfour, as poverty was to be a focal point at the beginning of the 20th century. Although it is reputed that Balfour was able, he was also witty. Lacking clear commitment in any particular direction could prove a major flaw, for both him and his political party. His principal concerns were education and defence. There was, he believed, 'no more serious waste than the waste of brains and intellect'. Misfortunes of the Conservative party noticeably outweighed the party's fortunes. A key political issue at the time was poverty. ...read more.

Middle

This was suitable during the period in which Britain was the leading industrial nation, but as competition with other countries intensified it was to the detriment of British manufacturers and farmers. The problem needed to be solved. There were efforts by Lord Churchill to implement further domestic reforms in the tradition of Tory democracy were unsuccessful, but the popular imperialist emphasis remained. In this period the party was gradually drawing closer to business class interests, but the insistence of Joseph Chamberlain on a pro-empire tariff reform split the party. He proposed that a protectionist tariffs needed to be introduced as it would protect British industry (i.e. industrialists and farmers). He also wanted to make possible a system of imperial preference, which was to the determent of most of the cabinet. The programme was strongly opposed by a small group of free traders. More seriously, working class fears that duties on food imports would raise the cost of living made it an electoral liability. The internal divisions caused a purge of the cabinet in 1903 and did much to cause three consecutive electoral defeats. The tariff reform campaign, which was launched in 1903, resulted in Chamberlain resigning and setting up a splinter group known as the tariff reform league. ...read more.

Conclusion

When the Lords blocked his policies he laid plans to curb their power. He also supported women's suffrage and introduced the Old age pension. Overall, it can be argued that the split in the Conservative party was to blame for the Liberal 'landslide' victory of 1906 however I feel that there are many other factors that played its part. Although the division of the Conservative party lacked the unity of the Liberals, it was difficult to point out to any Tory reform which was specifically intended to offer benefits of the working class and there is hardly any evidence that the Conservatives had genuinely succeeded in widening their power base. The post-Victorian era and the turn of the century gave a new dimension to politics. The voices of the working class had to be heard. The Conservatives were unprepared for 20th century Politics and were defeated for good reasons but largely over the wrong issues. The Tory's were vulnerable to the emergence of a new party with a broader appeal to the working-class vote than its own. The general election loss of 1906 wasn't due to the split of the Conservative party but rather complacency and neglect of working men's interests. Many Conservatives attributed the 1906 defeat to the natural swing of the electoral pendulum after ten years of Conservative government. The idea was 'the turn' of the Liberals to win. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Voters are not required to make a second choice if they do not wish to. Voters mark an 'X' in the first column for their first choice and a second 'X' in the second column for their other choice. Voters' first preferences are counted and if one candidate gets 50% of the vote, then he or she is elected.

  2. Is Britain a two-party or a multi party system, or something else?

    In contrast, if parties adopt a strong political ideology for either the left or right, you have only the option to be voted for by people on the political right or left extremes, rather than the majority in the middle and subsequently less chance of victory.

  1. The rise of Fascism in Italy was the result of a conservative reaction to ...

    There was food and raw material crisis while a large inflation reduced the Italian Lire to one fifth of its pre-war value. Encouraged by the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 the unemployed workers and some peasants, who would be the mostly benefited from a Socialist type government, stirred up riots and strikes throughout the country.

  2. Why did the Conservative Party split in 1846? - Ed Pearson When Peel announced ...

    held by the Ultras and those on the far right of the party such as Graham and Lord Staley who held minor positions. Anna Gambles brings up the idea that the reform had resulted in a 'modernised Conservatism which had adapted to the reform act of 1832 against a protectionist alternative.'

  1. Did Gladstone Unite or Divide the Liberals?

    In 1878 he said 'I am an out-and-out inequalitarian.' He believed in rule by those individuals in society who had a tradition of service to the state and possessed sufficient wealth to be above the charge of possible corruption. He was therefore a supporter of the traditional roles of monarchy and aristocracy.

  2. "Recent general election results have shown the need for electoral reform." Discuss.

    for example Blair did not have to agree with coalition partners before committing troops to Kosovo. Under PR voters do not choose the government the parties in a process called horse-trading where parties well try to form coalitions with each other.

  1. "Why did the Conservative government lose so much support by 1906?"

    There were positives and negatives to this situation; the positive was that more people were getting educated however the negative was far more serious. The conservatives lost a considerate amount of support from the 'non-conformists', i.e. anyone not of the Christian church, for example, Jews and Methodists.

  2. 'Conservative dominance in British Politics between 1885and 1902 was due to conservative strengths rather ...

    This appointment of the opposition was a astute move, as this brought the two groups closer together. Liberal Unionist leader Hartington gave his approval, and the two groups were closely linked throughout this period. This would have helped the conservatives, as it meant that liberals were supporting them, and gaining more support amongst different types of people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work