• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The McKenzie Thesis (explain). Is Britain still a two party system – was it and is it an accurate model?

Extracts from this document...


The McKenzie Thesis (explain). Is Britain still a two party system - was it and is it an accurate model? In his thesis, McKenzie dedicated 99.6% pages to discussing the Labour and Conservative parties. As this suggests he wrote off the Liberals and minor parties. He described a two party system where the two main parties compete in elections for an absolute majority of seats. Whilst one party forms the government, the other party forms the opposition whose aim is to expose the government and develop its own policy. McKenzie's thesis is contentious and a conjective. There is a debate about whether Britain has a two party system. Supporters argue the power has been shared between the Conservatives and Labour since 1945. Some opponents argue that the Conservatives have been the dominant party throughout the 20th Century. Others argue that a multiparty system has developed since 1970. ...read more.


And even in the period 1945 to 1979, seemingly two party rule is open to reinterpretation - as between 1951 and 1964 Labour lost three elections in a row. So to those who had lived through 13 years of Conservative rule it wouldn't much look like a two party system. Since the 1970s, the Liberals have won a considerable number of seats. Between 1970 and 1997 the two main parties share of the vote declined markedly. The Alliance won almost a quarter of the National vote - 25.4% in 1983. Since 1974 the plurality-rule voting system has always given around one fifth of the seats to parties not justified to hold them in terms of their share of the National vote. Labour and the Conservative can still jointly run an unreformed House of Commons as a kind of two-party majority government on their own. For example, in the 1997 General Election, Labour won about 60% of the seats on about 40% of the National vote - clearly the present system, isn't representative as it leads to these 'elected dictatorships' (Lord Hoarsham). ...read more.


Even in London, the heart of England, the weakening grip of two party conflicts was evident at an institutional level in the run-up to the GLA elections 2000, when the prospect of Livingstone running as an independent candidate for mayor, influenced the Labour nomination process. And in the 1999 elections for the European parliament, the success of fourth and fifth parties i.e. the Greens and British Independent Party in winning multiple seats in English regions notched up another small milestone in the arrival of multiparty politics. It is too hard to describe Britain as a whole - Dearlove & Saunders - Britain can be characterised as a two party system in the commons. As a multiparty system in the country and as a dominant party system in the corridors of power. Because the electoral system and the multiparty politics have together enabled the Conservatives to monopolise the control of the state for more than a decade in a way that has mocked the close competition of the country at large. 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Is Britain a two-party or a multi party system, or something else?

    is that "two-partism is defined by a regular alternation in power of the major parties" and also makes the point that "in a stable majoritarian democracy, it is share concurrently in a consensus democracy".8 He explains that parties take on popular policies from opposition and that to gain re-election, the

  2. The American Two Party System

    that the parties were longer lasting, but more important that they existed across state lines, and on the different levels of government. (United States History 108). After the new government was officially selected and its new president elected, another manifestation of the problems of partisanship came to light.

  1. Select And Explain The Most Important Turning Points In Nelson Mandela's Life

    It also gave those fighting apartheid support and increased criticism of the South African government. Although this presentation only looks at the Mandela Campaign inside the UK, this is of importance as the AAM had c lose links with other AAMs and world bodies.

  2. To what extent does Britain have a two party system?

    in 1931, which went onto govern Britain until the end of the Second World War. The National Government was dominated by the Conservatives. The British party system during the post war period until the 1970s has been described as bipartisan in character.

  1. "The UK is a two party system" - does this comment still apply today?

    Since the February 1974 general election, the Liberals either alone or allied to the Social Democrats have contested virtually all UK constituencies and has achieve a creditable share of the vote. Whilst failing to achieve power in Westminster since the First World War, the Liberal Democrat party fares particularly well

  2. DanielO’Connell – 1775 – 1847

    The Prince Regent too, like his father, King George in; before him, maintained an obstinate opposition to Catholic emancipation during the years of his Regency, 1811-20. So, before the 1820s, all the bills introduced into the House of Commons by supporters of Emancipation were rejected by large majorities.

  1. In this essay I will explain the distinctive features of the Scottish political system, ...

    Opposing them are about one fifth who support greater autonomy within Britain. The Scottish Convention of the early 1990's, convened by non-party figures but supported by the Liberal Democrats and Labour, represented these people. "Scotland's Claim of Rights, which it produced, promotes the kind of political reform they wish to

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    One of them was that the Maltese at Algiers had to be loyal to the French administrations. The French government granted his dominance over the whole country, and the Maltese being under the British influence could have disagreed with certain French perspectives.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work