• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Prime Ministerial Tenure of John Major: a failure of leadership?

Extracts from this document...


The Prime Ministerial Tenure of John Major: a failure of leadership? The rationale for evaluating John Major's leadership of the Conservative Party in the 1992-1997 period revolves around a desire to examine the factors that contributed to the electoral meltdown of the Conservative Party in the 1997 election. The project revolves around attempting to substantiate the following hypothesis: that under the leadership of John Major the Conservative Party lost the characteristics of a party of government. The project will seek to answer this question by firstly looking at the relationship between the Conservative Party and the electorate in terms of explaining the excellent record that the party has in post-war electoral politics, and will then proceed to outline Philip Norton's 'party of government' model (which shall be used as a framework for this project) on a theoretical basis, consisting of four components: governing competence, party unity, strong leadership and public service. Norton argues that electoral success is likely if a political party successfully obtains and maintains all of these components. ...read more.


on two occasions in 1945 and 1966 but for the other three election results, Labour's majorities were minute. Whereas, the Conservative Party has managed to do gain 'real' victories on all eight occasions it has won elections, even succeeding in managing to gain majorities over or near 100 on three occasions. Therefore, on examination of the electoral results in the 1945- 1992 period, it is evident that the Conservative Party has dominated the British political system for most of that time, reflecting their popularity with the electorate and giving weight to the view that they are the 'natural party of government'. The Party of Government Model. The 'party of government' model consists of four components: governing competence, party unity, strong leadership and public service. This model was put forward by Philip Norton has attempted to argue that electoral success depends on whether a political party has obtained each and every one of its four characteristics, whilst successfully demonstrating this to the electorate at the same time. ...read more.


Past evidence has shown that if a party, or its individual members, fail to put the public interest before their own, this contributes to electoral unpopularity. Having outlined the 'party of government' model, it is now possible to proceed to use this theory as a framework to analyse the Conservative government of 1992- 1997 and attempt to argue that it had lost the characteristics of a 'party of government' in 1997, thus leading to the electoral meltdown in the 1997 election. Plan for the governing competence section. State the traditional view on the Conservative Party as the party of economic competence. Major's economic policy. * Manifesto promises (low inflation and low taxation through ERM). What went wrong? * Collapse of UK membership of ERM. * Poor handling of the crisis and the actual crash itself = deficit = * Rise in taxation. However, rise of economic prosperity in 1995+. Why did the CP not benefit from this? If we look at Sanders model- 5 components for economic competence. * Major re-obtained four- but not the media support. Leads to discussion of the subjective economy- perception. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Even in a close election, where the major parties were level-pegging, one party has usually been able to form a government independent of any coalition partners (see Norris 1996). Responsive and Accountable Government Yet governments are also seen as 'responsive'.

  2. Free essay

    Reforms of Turkey under Mustafa Ataturk, with regards to the revelutions from above

    likely that Ataturk intended to "...cut another tie with the past, and to the Islamic east, and push the nation towards the future of the west."10 Furthermore, in the education system Ataturk made compulsory the study of Turkish history, whereby before schools taught the history of the Ottoman Empire and rule.

  1. To what extent can the failure of the Fascist Movement to challenge the existing ...

    Within the first few years of the party being set-up barely any financial regulation existed under deputy leader Forgan. There was theft from Fascist funds which caused a lack of resources. Members paid to be part of the movement and funding drastically decreased as support lessened from the years 1935

  2. Churchill's Leadership

    The Government regulations also covered the protection of the civilian population. The two main features for this were the planning and execution of programmes the evacuate children from major cities, and a civil defence scheme covering air-raid shelters and blackout procedures. Rationing was also another scheme introduced by the Government.

  1. This assignment identifies and discusses the major social and political trends expected to affect ...

    A related problem is the high level of dental and skeletal fluorosis that occurs in several areas, particularly on Africa's east coast. The United Nations development programme (UNDP) in 1997 stated that with repeated droughts and chronic water shortages in many areas, most countries and people already pay an extremely high price for water and for the lack of water.

  2. The Argument among the Major Stakeholders In the Australian Waterfront Dispute.

    The Patrick group had to agree to meet the legal costs of MUA, about 1.5 million Australia dollars, the MUA succeeded in the dispute (Petzall, Timo & About, 2000). This essay will explain the dispute from three main views of stakeholders: the government, the unions and the stevedoring and stevedores in this dispute.

  1. Was the Provisional Government doomed to failure?

    The socialists, however, except the Menshevik Internationals who opposed the continuation of the war, wanted to fight a defensive war only, to prevent defeat by Germany. Robert Bruce Lockhart, a reporter sent to the British Government in March 1917 stated that 'The Bolsheviki are the more extreme party.

  2. To what extent does ministerial responsibility ensure accountability to the government?

    The government's collective responsibility is to have the confidence of Parliament at all times. If at any time this confidence is questioned the governing party must be subjected to a vote in Parliament. Failure to win the vote requires the government to either resign or dissolve Parliament.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work