• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Provisional Government.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History essay on the Provisional Government The Provisional Government had attempted to keep its power over Russian affairs during the trouble that followed the abdication of the tsar in February 1917, and as events would show, they were largely unsuccessful in doing so. This may have been because of Kerensky's mistakes, the government's lack of political power, or its failure to solve the problems of Russia's peasant majority. The Bolsheviks were quick to take advantage of time of weakness, although whether or not they succeeded because the Provisional Government failed needs to be assessed. The primary weakness of the Provisional Government was that it was essentially powerless. Primarily this was because the government was simply a 'provisional' one, meant only as a temporary solution until the revolution had run its course. When the Soviet drew up Order Number 1 in March 1917, it effectively limited the power that the government could have upon the Russian people. The Soviet held the power over the troops; the railroads, post and telegraphs, and the Provisional Government could do little to prevent such political domination. ...read more.

Middle

By attempting to send some units of the Petrograd garrison to the front, the government made situations worse, eventually escalating to chaotic desertions of army garrisons. Paradoxically, the Provisional Government had rallied the offensive in the war in order to create a sense of 'civic patriotism' that hopefully would end the conflict and bring peace to Russia. The Provisional Government failed to solve much of the issues that racked the nation, especially the ever-present problem of lack of food and the redistribution of the land that the peasants wanted. In this way the Bolshevik party appealed to the masses, using attractive slogans such as 'Peace, Bread and Land!' and 'All Power to the Soviets!' Whether or not they would fulfil their promises meant little as long as there was a hope that things would improve. Kerensky proved to be no better at handling the decisive decisions that were required of his leadership. He had been called as the national hero who would be able to bring together the country and stop the drift towards civil war, but his vanity and alter ego as Napoleon Bonaparte hardly fit his description of himself as the 'hostage of democracy' that he was sometimes called. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Provisional Government made no real attempt to control the power of the Soviets, although it could be argued that by the time they realized the stuff that was going on, they no longer had any means to control such an example of civil disobedience. The Provisional Government was almost another reminder of the Tsar in the way that it was so incapable of solving the problems that Russia faced that so desperately needed attention. It would not be false to say the popularity of the Bolshevik party largely depended on what the Provisional Government did. The Provisional Government's weaknesses and failures increased appeal for the Bolsheviks, especially since the other socialist parties became identified with the Provisional Government. However, it cannot be right to argue that it was only the mistakes of the Provisional Government that brought the October Revolution (and the government's demise) about. The Bolsheviks had strengths and favourable factors that allowed it to maximize its advantage over the other socialist parties and over the Provisional Government. The role of Lenin in the party was crucial-his leadership proved very important amongst the unruly days of the Bolshevik rising. D.Shears ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Was the provisional government doomed to failure from the beginning

    The fact that the Bolsheviks were dedicated, organised, planned and had an extremely committed leader weakened the position of the provisional government as they did not have as much legitimacy, organisation or dedication as the Bolsheviks. If the Bolsheviks were taken out of the equation it may have been a

  2. How did the failure of the Provisional Government allow for the rise of the ...

    Rethinking the Russian Revolution. New York, Replika Press Pvt. Ltd. P.129 This book author is a Professor of Modern European History at the University of East Anglia. The book is therefore directed to college students for more in depth research.

  1. To what extents can the events of 1905 in Russia be considered a revolution.

    As war continued, discontent multiplied. COURSE OF THE 1905 REVOLUTION A. THE FIRST STAGE: THE BLOODY SUNDAY (JANUARY 1905) When Port Arthur fell (the most crushing of the series of defeats in the Far East which determined the outcome of the Russo-Japanese War), discontent reached almost the breaking point.

  2. Geopolitical consequences of the demise of the Soviet Union

    Although the stakes involved remain the same, i.e., power, influence, security, wealth, the new playing field is further complicated by an array of problems. These include intra-regional conflict, political instability, fierce competition among multinational corporations, and a shortfall in commercial expertise and legal infrastructures.

  1. Was the collapse of the provisional government inevitable

    This caused the people not be so trustful with the provisional government and doubt their ability to lead well, since the war was a big failure. When the provisional government wanted to stabilize it by broadening its social base and live on the moderate socialists for support, they refused and

  2. Was the Provisional Government fatally weakened from the first? Notes

    It would be these that would destroy the always tenuous (fragile) partnership of the dual authority, and it would be Lenin who would begin the process of its destruction. 2: Lenin's Return in April What impact did Lenin's return have on the situation in Petrograd?

  1. To what extent was the Great War responsible for the collapse of the Provisional ...

    However, the question and this investigation are only concerned with the last of these governments in which Alexander Kerensky was the leader or Prime Minister. The weakening of the Provisional Government because of its reforms and policies was a result of its incumbents and hence its collapse may partly be blamed on its leadership.

  2. After the March revolution and the Tsar's resignation, why did the Provisional Government last ...

    When the Russian people looked at the other governments of Europe, they saw people living in good houses and in good conditions. When the people chose to have a democratic government over another dictatorship, these were the governments they wanted and aspired to, and when the Provisional Government did not

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work