• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The replacement of the East India Company, by the British Government, had a substantial effect on the way India was governed. How far, though, did this improve the way in which India was governed?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Pal Shah 30/03/2003 10 C History I.G.C.S.E History - Coursework: Part 2 Imperialism 1. The replacement of the East India Company, by the British Government, had a substantial effect on the way India was governed. How far, though, did this improve the way in which India was governed? One must not forget that the East India Company was a commercial company, and that its solitary purpose was to make yield profit in everything it did. In this sense, the British Government was better than the company. The British Government, on the other hand, wanted to improve trade with India - it was ready to pay for Indian goods, such as tea and cotton, thus improving the Indian economy, and making life better for the locals (even though in reality, the Indians weren't really paid what they deserved). ...read more.

Middle

Another extremely important facility that was introduced by the Government was the fact that public hospitals were set-up all cross the sub-continent. This helped save many lives - and this was a thing that one would rarely get to see under the rule of the Company. The government also introduced new farming methods to help the Indians yield more of their farms - thus helping them agriculturally. Finally, under the supervision of the new regime, the Indians were also able to establish their own political party (which was called the Congress). There were also though, drawbacks of the new British regime One of these drawbacks, was the fact that India was now divided - the British community segregated themselves from the Indians, increasing racist problems. ...read more.

Conclusion

2. "The Chinese never truly accepted western trade and ideas which were thrust upon them in the nineteenth century." How far is this statement right? The Chinese were "Officially...not much impressed by Western traders. Emperor Ch'ien Lung (1735-1799) wrote to King George III after a trade delegation had arrived in Peking during 1793: "I accept the royal gifts of clocks, guns and telescopes because you have taken so much trouble to bring them to me...But I must point out that there is nothing we lack! We have never set much store on strange or ingenious objects, nor do we need any of your countries manufactures"." This quote goes on to show how several leading Chinese resisted foreign trade. Emperor Ch'ien Lung detested the foreigners and officially gave them only one port (Whampoa) where to trade, initially. There were several reasons why the emperor didn't like and didn't trust. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Party system in India

    But the Congress enjoyed exclusive control over governmental power at the Centre and in most of the States during this period. The greatest evidence is results of the first three general elections to the Lok Sabha. Congress won three-fourths of seats; and it ruled in all the States, except a brief interlude during 1957-59 in Kerala.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    The Maltese were still considered to be poor, and thus the conditions that they lived in them were quite critical. For example in Tripoli and Benghazi the Maltese weren't able to buy their own property. The Royal Commission of 1877-1878 Development in the Mediterranean urged a change in the British stand over.

  1. Fedralism in India

    3) Clear cut Division of powers between the centre and the states so that each of them understands their jurisdiction and there is no conflict over it. 4) The presence of an impartial and independent Judiciary which is the guardian and protector of the Constitution and helps maintain the balance of powers between the centers and the states.

  2. HUMANITIES COURSEWORK

    Another major importance of this conflict would be refugees. Many state the first victims of this conflict were thousands of Arabs who had been forced to leave their homes in the areas Israel controlled. Most of the Palestinian refugees crossed borders and some took refuge in Lebanon, while others went

  1. In what ways did the British government attempt to change the government of India ...

    Gandhi told the Indian people not to co-operation with the British through non-violence. This included strikes, fasting and boycotts. The British had no idea how to punish these people. If they beat them the Indian public would loose more faith in the British and the non-violent campaigns would gain more support.

  2. 1. What do you learn from Source A about ...

    people from another, you could imagine what would happen all over India if Britain did not do anything. Source E shows communal violence was escalating. 'You could see a crop of one religion or another' 'being laid on their faces' ' and being beheaded into the river' ' the river was literally choked with dead bodies'.

  1. The Advent of Imperialism

    other minerals has been greatly developed; in Bombay and elsewhere cotton mills with modern machinery have been set up, and the organisation of other machine industries is helping to find employment for the population of large cities. Tea, coffee, indigo, jute, tobacco, and other important crops have been introduced was into Indian agriculture.

  2. Japanese Imperialism.

    Thus, in 1868, Japan's military government was overthrown and replaced by a new imperial government under the fifteen-year-old Meiji Emperor. In April of that year, the Emperor announced a policy of modernization, whereby the Japanese resolved to become powerful enough to deal with the Westerners in terms of equality, as hypothesized by (Cowie, 1993, p112).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work