• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Rhodesian Revolution

Extracts from this document...


The Rhodesian Revolution Rhodesia, now called Zimbabwe, is a nation that never featured apartheid. Race relations were generally decent under the government of Ian Smith. Smith's book "The Great Betrayal" clearly spells this out. Former President, Jimmy Carter, would not even see Ian Smith in 1979 when Smith came to the White House to beg for help. Ian Smith then asked Henry Kissinger for help when Carter would not help him. Smith asked; "What about loyalty?" since rhodesians had long served the British Empire. Kissinger told Smith, "There is no place for such ideals in the modern world." Many Americans might have reservations about helping whites in Southern Africa because of apartheid. The evil deeds of apartheid killers have been tried in South African courts and apartheid is over and its worst criminals have been punished, thank God! However, all of this corruption started when a revolution broke out in Rhodesia. Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe, was born out of the negotiations led by Prime Minister Ian Smith, with the moderate nationalist leaders during the course of 1978. ...read more.


(McKinely) Britain called the proclamation an act of insurgence but refused to reestablish control by force. "When I was in Rhodesia, we weren't fighting the local Africans; we were fighting Cuban terrorists who infiltrated our country through Mozambique, east of Rhodesia" (Myrtle). When negotiations in 1966 failed to produce an agreement, Britain requested economic sanctions against Rhodesia. On March 1, 1970, Rhodesia formally proclaimed itself a republic. Heightened guerrilla warfare and a withdrawal of South America military in 1976, marked the beginning of the collapse of Smiths eleven years of resistance. (Zimbabwe) Negotiations were restarted in the mid-1970's and in 1971, Britain and Rhodesia reached an agreement that provided African political participation, but without any guarantee of eventual black majority rule. Rhodesian Independence was finally recognized in 1979, the British government resuming control pending elections in February 1980. Rhodesia, now renamed Zimbabwe, finally became an independent nation within the British Commonwealth on April 18 of that year. (Rhodesian Independence) A white Rhodesian who was called for his service during the revolution noted that ...in my youthful mind I appreciated vaguely that something had to be radically wrong with the policies of the Rhodesian Front. ...read more.


(Zimbabwe) Later in 1979, under pressure from Britain, an agreement was reached to provide for a legally independent, democratically governed Zimbabwe. A new constitution was established and a truce was implemented; Britain agreed to finance a voluntary land-redistribution program. The country transmuted to British colonial rule until the transition to self-rule was complete. In the elections of April, 1980, Robert Mugabe's ZANU-PF (Patriotic Front) party won by a comfortable margin, and he became Prime Minister of the Republic of Zimbabwe when independence was achieved on April 18, 1980. "The transition from white government to black government was done relatively peacefully" (Myrtle). Over 25,000 people had been killed in the struggle for independence. As Ian Smith had long predicted, everybody's worst nightmare soon came to pass, the terrorist Mugabe and his ZANU party, through terrorism and intimidation, easily won at the corrupt elections. As a final insult to all Rhodesians, the country officially reverted back to a British colony and raised the Union flag. Apartheid was put to an end, the west ultimately forced it because it was an unfair regime. And within the last 2-3 years Africans have started to take over the white men's lands and kick them out of Zimbabwe. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. South Africa 1945-1994 The end of Apartheid.

    Leaders of the ANC planned a campaign of defiance of apartheid and Mandela was put in charge. He called for 10,000 volunteers; 8,577 responded. On 6 April 1952, whilst whites celebrated 300 years since the arrival of the Dutch, ANC supporters all over South Africa defined the apartheid regulation.

  2. In what ways were the lives of South Africans changed by the policy of ...

    The authorities tried to frighten them by low-flying jets, and eventually the police opened fire, killing 67 protestors and wounding another 200. There was a widespread protest and a state of emergency was proclaimed in South Africa. There were also many other protests.


    salaries force public servant to supplement their incomes illicitly while high salaries mean higher losses if public servants gets caught. In a small sample of 28 developing countries, they find a significant negative influence on the level of corruption of civil service wages relative to manufacturing wages i.e.

  2. How and why did Federation occur?

    All non-white immigrants were given a test in any European language. They had to pass to be allowed to stay in Australia. * Japan objected to WAP. They believed that they were superior to other Asian nations and should be treated differently.

  1. The development of nationalist movements in Southeast Asia

    In 1939, the Thakins joined the Indian leaders in withholding cooperation in the British war effort and were imprisoned by the British. 3. The Japanese Occupation During WW2, the Thakins were divided into three groups.Those committed to Communism included Thakin Soe and Thein Pe.

  2. Why did Britain have no '1848 revolution'?

    on the continent as it was through their organisation that the working class could be politicised and mobilised. On the continent many wanted modernisation on the British model, where the middling classes had already been enfranchised. For a working class movement to be successful in Britain it was essential that it also involved the middle class.

  1. Summary of the Causes of the 1905 Revolution.

    The social changes brought about by rapid industrialization contributed to the outbreak of revolution in 1905. This was aggravated by Russia's humiliating defeat in the Russo-Japanese War of 1905. What you should include in your essay Weak leadership of the Tsarist regime "X Weak, indecisive tsar "X Repressive government "X No moves towards Constitutional government "X Denied basic freedoms, e.g.

  2. Why Was There No British Revolution in Europe's 'Ageof Revolutions'?

    Moreover, as Britain steadily urbanised throughout the 19th Century the rural population base spread, resulting in a distinct decrease in agricultural discontent, and a shift to the industrial protest of workers and trade unions, such as the Luddites. However, this discontent never managed to successfully transfer itself into a political protest severely reducing its potential threat to British political stability.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work