• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Rhodesian Revolution

Extracts from this document...


The Rhodesian Revolution Rhodesia, now called Zimbabwe, is a nation that never featured apartheid. Race relations were generally decent under the government of Ian Smith. Smith's book "The Great Betrayal" clearly spells this out. Former President, Jimmy Carter, would not even see Ian Smith in 1979 when Smith came to the White House to beg for help. Ian Smith then asked Henry Kissinger for help when Carter would not help him. Smith asked; "What about loyalty?" since rhodesians had long served the British Empire. Kissinger told Smith, "There is no place for such ideals in the modern world." Many Americans might have reservations about helping whites in Southern Africa because of apartheid. The evil deeds of apartheid killers have been tried in South African courts and apartheid is over and its worst criminals have been punished, thank God! However, all of this corruption started when a revolution broke out in Rhodesia. Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe, was born out of the negotiations led by Prime Minister Ian Smith, with the moderate nationalist leaders during the course of 1978. ...read more.


(McKinely) Britain called the proclamation an act of insurgence but refused to reestablish control by force. "When I was in Rhodesia, we weren't fighting the local Africans; we were fighting Cuban terrorists who infiltrated our country through Mozambique, east of Rhodesia" (Myrtle). When negotiations in 1966 failed to produce an agreement, Britain requested economic sanctions against Rhodesia. On March 1, 1970, Rhodesia formally proclaimed itself a republic. Heightened guerrilla warfare and a withdrawal of South America military in 1976, marked the beginning of the collapse of Smiths eleven years of resistance. (Zimbabwe) Negotiations were restarted in the mid-1970's and in 1971, Britain and Rhodesia reached an agreement that provided African political participation, but without any guarantee of eventual black majority rule. Rhodesian Independence was finally recognized in 1979, the British government resuming control pending elections in February 1980. Rhodesia, now renamed Zimbabwe, finally became an independent nation within the British Commonwealth on April 18 of that year. (Rhodesian Independence) A white Rhodesian who was called for his service during the revolution noted that ...in my youthful mind I appreciated vaguely that something had to be radically wrong with the policies of the Rhodesian Front. ...read more.


(Zimbabwe) Later in 1979, under pressure from Britain, an agreement was reached to provide for a legally independent, democratically governed Zimbabwe. A new constitution was established and a truce was implemented; Britain agreed to finance a voluntary land-redistribution program. The country transmuted to British colonial rule until the transition to self-rule was complete. In the elections of April, 1980, Robert Mugabe's ZANU-PF (Patriotic Front) party won by a comfortable margin, and he became Prime Minister of the Republic of Zimbabwe when independence was achieved on April 18, 1980. "The transition from white government to black government was done relatively peacefully" (Myrtle). Over 25,000 people had been killed in the struggle for independence. As Ian Smith had long predicted, everybody's worst nightmare soon came to pass, the terrorist Mugabe and his ZANU party, through terrorism and intimidation, easily won at the corrupt elections. As a final insult to all Rhodesians, the country officially reverted back to a British colony and raised the Union flag. Apartheid was put to an end, the west ultimately forced it because it was an unfair regime. And within the last 2-3 years Africans have started to take over the white men's lands and kick them out of Zimbabwe. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. South Africa 1945-1994 The end of Apartheid.

    Countries would rather trade with South Africa than trade with Communists. Therefore, sanctions were not as strong as they could have been. It was their strong government and help of their determination which kept them going. However other countries experiences show that sanctions do not work for example, The United Nations has had sanctions against Iraq since 1990.

  2. Apartheid in South Africa.

    firearms used against the police, which is why they opened fire so as to 'prevent more tragic results'. This gives the impression that the police cared about the protesters and that they did not want to open fire, however, if they really did not want to open fire, then they should have fond some other way of controlling the crowds.

  1. In what ways were the lives of South Africans changed by the policy of ...

    The black children were taught that they were second-rate to the whites who were a more superior race. This kept the black majority under control and subordinate. Apartheid was beginning to rise in the late 1940's and became nationwide during 1950's, but Apartheid was to become even more racist and

  2. How and why did Federation occur?

    What were the main features of the White Australia Policy? * Immigration Restriction Act - 1901. This was the first act of law passed by the new Federal Government and it restricted entry into Australia. * The Dictation test was introduced to ensure that those who weren't white could be kept out legally.

  1. Why did Britain have no '1848 revolution'?

    On the continent it was in their interest to join forces with the working classes to create a mass movement against the existing order. In Britain, as can be seen through the Kennington common demonstration, the middle classes united with the elite and upper classes against the working class.

  2. Britain - A Tolerant Nation?

    In August 1977 the National Front declared that it would advance through Lewisham, which was a mainly black region. The police permitted these racists to march while capturing the anti-racists. Albeit this, anti-racists were successful and the racists overpowered. I n 1965 the first Race Relations Act was passed, and in 1976 a second Act was passed.


    utilities; forcing donor countries and agencies to hire lobbyists to clear their projects by bribing officials at different levels and failure of Food For Work and relief programmes to reach their targets due to massive theft and huge misuse ofresources (Kochanek, 1993).

  2. Why Was There No British Revolution in Europe's 'Ageof Revolutions'?

    Situations in Europe were often worsened by the predominantly rural community dependent upon agricultural supplies, suggested in France for example to be around 80%2 of the population; although Britain did experience rural riots and uprisings, such as reaction against the Corn Laws of 1815 and the Swing Riots, they were

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work