• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'THE SEPERATION OF POWERS: FACT OR FICTION UNDER THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION?'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'THE SEPERATION OF POWERS: FACT OR FICTION UNDER THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION?' The Separation of Powers is a concept of government whereby power is divided among the executive, judicial, and legislative branches. It is widely accepted that for a political system to be stable, the holders of power need to be balanced off against each other. One of the reasons widely cited is that it leads to a more just and humane system of government. This need not be the case but, as Lord Acton said: ``Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely''. By maintaining a balance between political forces, power is prevented from being concentrated in the hands of people who would be tempted to abuse it. But, in fact, we see this separation of powers not only in just and humane societies, but in oppressive ones as well. Its real, practical benefit is the stability it engenders. While a stable system may be oppressive and unpredictable, experience has shown that it is far less likely to exhibit these characteristics than an unstable one. Although not famed for his views on constitutional law, Terry Pratchett summed up the driving force behind the separation of powers very succinctly in one of his novels. ...read more.

Middle

The situation isn't entirely hopeless. Government will not be able to introduce the legislation it desires in the form that it wishes. Governments are sometimes defeated by their own back-benchers, or by the House of Lords. However, where the Government really wants to introduce a fundamental piece of legislation, it can make it an issue of confidence. The threat that the Government may have to resign, and thus bring about a dissolution of Parliament, is usually enough to get even the most reluctant back-bencher to go with the majority. THE LORD CHANCELLOR There are further problems with the separation of powers between the executive and the judiciary, although these are less troublesome in practice than they could be. Surprisingly, the appointment of the judiciary is entirely in the hands of the executive. The head of the judiciary, the Lord Chancellor, is a Cabinet minister selected by the Prime Minister. The Lord Chancellor either appoints, or advises on the appointment of, all other judges (notionally the sovereign is responsible for the appointment of judges, but in practice this is a formality). However, senior judges, once appointed, cannot be removed from office at the whim of the executive - unlike the Lord Chancellor himself - so there is a measure of independence after appointment. ...read more.

Conclusion

The executive exercises legislative powers by dominating Parliament. It exercises judicial responsibilities whenever an administrator exercises discretion to decide in favour of, say, one planning application rather than another. The judiciary creates law, subtly, and with circumspection. Who is to say that they are not bias being of certain race, class and social backgrounds. Parliament is able to discipline and hold to account its members, without the involvement of the courts. And so on. It should be clear that our system of government is a long way from Montesquieu's ideal. What is most surprising, however, is that it works as well as it does. Ultimately, I believe, it is the acceptance of constitutional conventions that keeps our country going. The Government could, for example, further dominate Parliament but, on the whole, it does not. Parliament could legally enact legislation that transfers the power to decide disputes away from the courts and more to administrators, but it does not. Judges could make radical changes to the law rather than incremental ones but, on the whole, they don't. And so on. The UK doesn't have a written constitution that sets out the balance and separation of powers so, ultimately, it is convention that controls these things. And convention works because everyone wants tomorrow to be the same as today. 1 [2000] 2 AC 115 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. Britain has a constitutional monarchy. The 'constitutional monarchy' is in which the monarch acknowledges ...

    Most of these countries in Commonwealth have progressed from British rule to independent self-government, so the Queen is not only the queen for United Kingdom, but also for the Commonwealth. The queen's role in the Commonwealth can function by promotes good international relations and trade with these countries.

  2. how can the judiciary protect human rights?

    It allows the Court to review the actions of public agents, such as ministers, and decide whether they acted 'ultra vires' outside their powers.

  1. Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely

    There are two alternative implications. An implication of Actons view is dealt with as part of Locke's social contract.

  2. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    The process continues until an absolute majority is secured. In the 1996 Australian elections, for example, there was a close call on the first preferences, with both the Australian Labour Party and the Liberal party getting 38.7 percent of the vote.

  1. Public Law

    A good example of this is EC Commission v UK9 where the Government failed to implement directives set out regarding the protection of workers in the event of transfers of undertaking or collective redundancies. This interpretation of domestic legislation as to its compatibility with EU Directives is known as the

  2. Public Law

    The judges in the courts, it is claimed, interpret the statutes to comply with the basic moral standards of society, by assuming parliament meant to conform to such standards (i.e. Dicey's Rule of Law). Hence enforcing moral constraints upon parliamentary sovereignty.

  1. Britain has no written constitution or comprehensive Bill of Rights, and is found partly ...

    freedom from torture, protection of privacy and family life, and freedom from discrimination in the application of these rights and freedoms. The British Constitution is indeterminate, indistinct, and unentrenched. It is found in no single constitutional document. The volumes entitled Constitutional Law in the official edition of the Statutes in

  2. personal exercis programme

    In sport, the longer an athlete's muscles are working to their maximum potential, without tiring, the longer he or she will be able to compete effectively at the best level possible. Therefore, having good muscular endurance is just as important as having good cardiovascular fitness as it also allows the individual to carry out tasks, and compete, without tiring.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work