• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The United States uses a presidential system of government and is a stable democracy; therefore, it is advisable for new democracies to also choose presidential systems of government

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The United States uses a presidential system of government and is a stable democracy; therefore, it is advisable for new democracies to also choose presidential systems of government. Discuss The United States is arguably the most powerful and prosperous nation in the world and has had a successful stable democracy under presidential government for over 200 years. So surely therefore new democracies in the modern day should adopt the presidential system of government used by the United States? In this essay I will discuss this issue. Even though the United States uses presidentialism, the majority of the world's stable democracies actually use a form of parliamentary government including the United Kingdom. Therefore I will also use the parliamentary system to compare with presidentialism of the United States and see if this alternative form of government may be more suitable for new democracies to adopt. I will briefly outline how the presidential system works along with the parliamentary system before discussing the advantages and disadvantages in general. I will then move on to new democracies in the past who have adopted presidentialism from round the world but mainly focusing on the Latin American nations and analysing their success before reaching my conclusions. Hague and Harrop state that presidentialism to be a "...form of constitutional rule in which the chief executive governs using the authority derived from direct election, with an independent legislature." ...read more.

Middle

If adopted by a new democracy then they may be unable to address pressing problems. A solution maybe to raise presidential power and so make him the spearhead of an active and effective government but in new democracies may give him too much power. However if I briefly criticise the parliamentary system on the point that this problem supposedly does not occur. In the Weimar Republic there was the problem of 'negative majorities' which is "...majorities of the right and left that combined forces against the political centre but that were ideologically too far apart to be able together to form an alternative coalition cabinet." (Satori: 86) Then the 'constructive vote of no confidence' means that a cabinet may remain in power but, because it is opposed by a majority in the legislature, be unable to get any of its proposed legislation adopted. Secondly there is temporal rigidity. The president's fixed term in office "breaks the political process into discontinuous, rigidly demarcated periods, leaving no room for continuous readjustments that events may demand" (Lijphart: 134 ). Thirdly the 'winner-take-all rule' so only one candidate and one party can win presidency; everyone else loses. There is a concentration of power where there are little incentives for him or her to form coalitions and take part in give-and-take negotiations with the opposition which maybe needed to solve divisive problems. ...read more.

Conclusion

Political culture is the nature, attitudes and behaviour of people towards politics including aspects of participation, authoritisation, corruptness and so on. An argument that UK parliament has effective checks and balances is that of the political culture of the British people. The UK has always had a tradition of 'accountability' where if something went wrong; whoever was responsible would resign, although some say that is changing at the present. This could therefore contribute greatly to why Latin America has not functioned like the US political system, due to economic and cultural factors such as corruptness, and the correlation between democracy and Protestantism where catholic nations have found it harder to adopt stable democracy. Also it seems geography seems to play a major part where the Latin American nations have adopted America's presidential system from up north and countries such as Czech Republic and Hungary have adopted the parliamentary form which dominates Western Europe, probably with the thought of their decision to join the European Union in their minds. In conclusion the USA is the only stable democracy using the presidential system for a continuous extended period of time and parliamentary democracies through history have performed better. So in terms of Latin America only time will tell if they made the right choice to embrace presidentialism. Many of the new democracies have deep political cleavages and numerous political parties for which a parliamentary system of government will probably provide a better hope for preserving democracy. However as seen from African history under ethnic conflicts parliamentarism can be unstable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "The British Parliament is weak whereas the US Congress is powerful." Discuss.

    Furthermore, the Constitution gives Congress exclusive control over matters in regard to its own composition, rules, agenda, internal structure and timetable. The president has no control over these areas.27 The Constitution lists a wide range of congressional powers, including coining money, maintaining a military, and declaring war.

  2. Comparing the German and Russian systems of government

    The State Duma consists of 450 seats and is elected through two types of mandates. The first is the party-list vote, whereby 225 seats are divided among those parties that can hurdle the 5 percent vote barrier. The other 225 seats are distributed through single-member constituencies on a first-past-the-post basis.

  1. The main features of Britain's democracy.

    features that Britain's democratic system includes, due to more attention being drawn by elected institutions and parties. The next type of a democratic system is, as described in most political science dictionaries, the one where a small group of wealthy, highly educated and more privileged men are able to govern a state.

  2. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    There must be direct participation by the whole adult citizens in the making of decisions that have the force of law and are binding on the entire society. 'the fundamental tenets of the liberal-democratic world view: namely that human

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    Combines the positive elements of both the purely proportional and majoritarian systems Tends to encourage the existence of two or three major parties with ideologies that lean left and right. It is argued that this creates a clearer choice for voters.

  2. Why is corruption so prominent in the contemporary Latin American political scene?

    dramatically in Paraguay, no doubt influenced by the lack of strong government and by individual personal greed which has been displayed by many Latin American political leaders. (23) Increasingly Paraguayan politics began to resemble a sultanistic style of politics that can be seen to have strengthened political corruption; its legacy continues to exist in Paraguay today and fuels corruption.

  1. In the UK, we do not have a representative democracy because the government dominates ...

    Each elected MP represents an area which is called a constituency. The electorate has given the responsibility of making decisions to the MP who wants to be in that position. For five years the MP represents his or her constituency and if they fail to perform they can be removed from this position by the people of their constituency.

  2. What factors do Prime Ministers take into account when choosing their cabinets?

    It is also good to have these figures as it is said that the public now spend more of their interest in politicians, rather than policy. Another factor, which the PM should consider, is the strength of the person. This means that once they made up their mind on an idea they should be decisive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work