• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The United States uses a presidential system of government and is a stable democracy; therefore, it is advisable for new democracies to also choose presidential systems of government

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The United States uses a presidential system of government and is a stable democracy; therefore, it is advisable for new democracies to also choose presidential systems of government. Discuss The United States is arguably the most powerful and prosperous nation in the world and has had a successful stable democracy under presidential government for over 200 years. So surely therefore new democracies in the modern day should adopt the presidential system of government used by the United States? In this essay I will discuss this issue. Even though the United States uses presidentialism, the majority of the world's stable democracies actually use a form of parliamentary government including the United Kingdom. Therefore I will also use the parliamentary system to compare with presidentialism of the United States and see if this alternative form of government may be more suitable for new democracies to adopt. I will briefly outline how the presidential system works along with the parliamentary system before discussing the advantages and disadvantages in general. I will then move on to new democracies in the past who have adopted presidentialism from round the world but mainly focusing on the Latin American nations and analysing their success before reaching my conclusions. Hague and Harrop state that presidentialism to be a "...form of constitutional rule in which the chief executive governs using the authority derived from direct election, with an independent legislature." ...read more.

Middle

If adopted by a new democracy then they may be unable to address pressing problems. A solution maybe to raise presidential power and so make him the spearhead of an active and effective government but in new democracies may give him too much power. However if I briefly criticise the parliamentary system on the point that this problem supposedly does not occur. In the Weimar Republic there was the problem of 'negative majorities' which is "...majorities of the right and left that combined forces against the political centre but that were ideologically too far apart to be able together to form an alternative coalition cabinet." (Satori: 86) Then the 'constructive vote of no confidence' means that a cabinet may remain in power but, because it is opposed by a majority in the legislature, be unable to get any of its proposed legislation adopted. Secondly there is temporal rigidity. The president's fixed term in office "breaks the political process into discontinuous, rigidly demarcated periods, leaving no room for continuous readjustments that events may demand" (Lijphart: 134 ). Thirdly the 'winner-take-all rule' so only one candidate and one party can win presidency; everyone else loses. There is a concentration of power where there are little incentives for him or her to form coalitions and take part in give-and-take negotiations with the opposition which maybe needed to solve divisive problems. ...read more.

Conclusion

Political culture is the nature, attitudes and behaviour of people towards politics including aspects of participation, authoritisation, corruptness and so on. An argument that UK parliament has effective checks and balances is that of the political culture of the British people. The UK has always had a tradition of 'accountability' where if something went wrong; whoever was responsible would resign, although some say that is changing at the present. This could therefore contribute greatly to why Latin America has not functioned like the US political system, due to economic and cultural factors such as corruptness, and the correlation between democracy and Protestantism where catholic nations have found it harder to adopt stable democracy. Also it seems geography seems to play a major part where the Latin American nations have adopted America's presidential system from up north and countries such as Czech Republic and Hungary have adopted the parliamentary form which dominates Western Europe, probably with the thought of their decision to join the European Union in their minds. In conclusion the USA is the only stable democracy using the presidential system for a continuous extended period of time and parliamentary democracies through history have performed better. So in terms of Latin America only time will tell if they made the right choice to embrace presidentialism. Many of the new democracies have deep political cleavages and numerous political parties for which a parliamentary system of government will probably provide a better hope for preserving democracy. However as seen from African history under ethnic conflicts parliamentarism can be unstable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "The British Parliament is weak whereas the US Congress is powerful." Discuss.

    Congress also controls federal taxing and spending policies, one of the most important sources of power in the government. However, one of the most important powers is Congress' authority to investigate and oversee the executive branch and its agencies, such as the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice.28

  2. Too much democracy is a recipe for anarchy. Discuss.

    Roger Scruton argues that democratic process works for the common good. Locke believed that government served to enforce 'Gods rules for living'. The moral knowledge, however is innate so all men can be held to it. He also believed firmly in a democratic system of government, writing that "(w)

  1. Comparing the German and Russian systems of government

    A referendum in December of the same year passed a new constitution defining parliament's powers. Before this new constitution in Russia the country was in a time of struggle between the executive and the legislature as both could claim authority.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of federalism in the USA?

    The conflict was based on the disagreement whether the nation should apply "sate centred"13 (States being either equall or superior to the government) or "nation centred policy"14 (USA being one nation recognising the constitution as the "supreme law of the land"15 and that states are neither superior nor equal to the government)

  1. How successful was the government of King Philip II of Spain?

    For example, the Council of State's duties included overseeing Spain's diplomatic and military interests in Europe, specifically the Netherlands and Italy despite the fact that there were specific councils for these countries and a Council of War. This lead to conflict between different powerful officials and was intensified by Philip's

  2. How important are political parties to the decision-making process involved in Congress and what ...

    In another article written by Cox and McCubbins, Congress becomes stabilized because of party organizations that bind its members together. The party matters to Cox McCubbins because it stabilizes the structure within Congress. Another author that believes party plays an important role in controlling congressional actions is Rohde.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    (Whereas in a PR system, voters may be confused by a multitude of parties with narrow interests.) Facilitates the participation of many political parties, representing a broad spectrum of interests and a variety of views. The argument is that this allows for greater voter choice (than in the PM system).

  2. Free essay

    Outline the principal sources of authority available to US presidents. How similar is executive ...

    However, the president's political status and strategic positioning does not end with the state of congress. The public interpretation of strength associated with the election results, the exact number of seats possessed by the President's party in both the Senate and the House of Representatives, midterm election results, the nature

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work