• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can the Tory party be responsible for its collapse in 1830?

Extracts from this document...


By Judi Gebhard To what extent can the Tory party be responsible for its collapse in 1830? Before 1830 the Tory party had been in government for nearly 50 years and had seemed to have everything under control up till 1815, between 1815 and 1830 the government faced many problems and made many changes but by 1830, the party collapsed. There is major debate to what caused the break down. I am going to look at the events leading up to the parties collapse to find out to what extent the Tory party was responsible for its collapse. When the Napoleonic wars came to an end in 1815, it would seemed good news, but it was quite the opposite as the after affects of the wars were left on Britain. Leaving major unemployment, huge money problems and therefore major discontent across British society, this was not helped by the advance in technology and the harsh attitude of the government. ...read more.


Lord Liverpool the Prime minister, a man that was said have' respect, honesty, professionalism and skilled in controlling', resigned due to health issues. It is obvious that losing a leader with such great talents was going to cause massive disruption. The next year the Tories had different periods experienced 5 different prime ministers all whom were of no good, therefore the party became very rocky and unstable. If finding a prime minister who was good for the job was not bad enough, across the waters major conflict was arousing in Ireland. (just give them potatoes.) Daniel O'Connell, with the support of the Catholic Association, won the county Clare election. However because he was a catholic he was not allowed to take his seat. Wellington the prime minister, had two choices. Either he could pass a Catholic Emancipation Act and let O'Connell take his seat or he could declare the election null and void. Doing this he ran the risk of violence in Ireland, and possible civil war. ...read more.


So I think the decision of Wellington was for the best. Although pleasing the Irish meant displeasing the ultra Tories. However if Wellington decided against Catholic emancipation he could have lost the support of the more liberal Tories. However I do think that the Ultra Tories were largely responsible for the break down. The ultra Tories before 1820 had the British public in mass repression, we can see this by looking at their outbreaks of discontent. They got themselves into this mess by not listening to the public, being to harsh and generally not having much interest in their needs and welfare. I think whatever the public would have got what they wanted as they have millions of people as a threat and would be able to cause a civil war or revolution. I think the Ultra Tories were to blind to see this and without the Liberal Tories this would have happened. However because they did react the Ultras didn't like it and left leaving them with a very weak party which later lead to their collapse. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. To what extent was ‘Inept Leadership’ responsible for the failure of Chartism?

    It is therefore more likely that O'Connor saved the movement and turned "a pressure group into a national movement"11. However there were some ways in which the leadership contributed in the ultimate failure of the movement. The perception of O'Connor as a "physical force" Chartist and Lovett as a "moral force" Chartist cannot have aided the movement.

  2. To What Extent Was Peel's Reorganisation of the Tory Party responsible for the election ...

    Peel, however recognised that by entering Parliament as a minority for the second time, would making him appear as weak and ineffectual as Melbourne had seemed. He would have been robbed of the chance to establish himself as a man of principle hence his bold refusal, much to the surprise and dismay of his party.

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was Sir Robert Peel responsible for the conservative party break up ...

    He did introduce a few social reforms such as the Mines Act of 1842 but most of these seem haft hearted and unaffected. The Mines act 1942 is often seen to lack certain clauses as it still allow boys from 10-16 to work in the Pitts.

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    Boyce suggests that the British were also concerned with their world image and did not want to be seen as 'standing in the way of self determination', which was championed by US President Wilson in 1919. However given the significance of the Irish issue for Britain and the considerable support

  1. To what extents can the events of 1905 in Russia be considered a revolution.

    He was the last Czar. He still believed that it was his sacred duty to uphold the principle of autocracy, but he was unsuited to be an autocrat. He was weak and indecisive in character. He easily succumbed to the influences of stronger personalities--the most important one was his wife, Princess Alexandra.

  2. The 'Liberal Tories'. To what extent do you agree with this description of the ...

    As a result of Huskisson's influence, the colonies could now trade with foreign countries, however the government attempted to retain their support by ensuring that duties were lower on goods trading between Britain and the colonies than non-Imperial trade. The final economic reform set up by the new `Liberal Tory' government was the reduction of domestic duties, influenced by Robinson.

  1. Conservative Victory of 1941, Peel and the Weakness of the Whigs.

    He had the political experience, clearly was an intellect and of course, Peel had quite the influence over the nation that would surely enable him to get the Tory party in a strong position for the 1941 elections. The crushing 1832 defeat left Peel's Tories in a highly unenviable position.

  2. To what extent was the Great War responsible for the collapse of the Provisional ...

    Therefore, though the Great War did present fundamental problems the government did nothing to better their own situation. The policies of the Provisional Government came from its Prime Minister, whom the historians have had varying views on. What is known as the Provisional Government was actually four successive governments that became more left orientated as it changed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work